A Novel Nomogram to Identify Candidates for Focal Therapy Among Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed via Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted and Systematic Biopsies: A European Multicenter Study.

Eligibility criteria Focal therapy Nomogram Prostate cancer

Journal

European urology focus
ISSN: 2405-4569
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Focus
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101665661

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 May 2023
Historique:
received: 15 02 2023
revised: 12 03 2023
accepted: 21 04 2023
medline: 6 5 2023
pubmed: 6 5 2023
entrez: 5 5 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Suitable selection criteria for focal therapy (FT) are crucial to achieve success in localized prostate cancer (PCa). To develop a multivariable model that better delineates eligibility for FT and reduces undertreatment by predicting unfavorable disease at radical prostatectomy (RP). Data were retrospectively collected from a prospective European multicenter cohort of 767 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted and systematic biopsies followed by RP in eight referral centers between 2016 and 2021. The Imperial College of London eligibility criteria for FT were applied: (1) unifocal MRI lesion with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score of 3-5; (2) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤20 ng/ml; (3) cT2-3a stage on MRI; and (4) International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (GG) 1 and ≥6 mm or GG 2-3. A total of 334 patients were included in the final analysis. The primary outcome was unfavorable disease at RP, defined as GG ≥4, and/or lymph node invasion, and/or seminal vesicle invasion, and/or contralateral clinically significant PCa. Logistic regression was used to assess predictors of unfavorable disease. The performance of the models including clinical, MRI, and biopsy information was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. A coefficient-based nomogram was developed and internally validated. Overall, 43 patients (13%) had unfavorable disease on RP pathology. The model including PSA, clinical stage on digital rectal examination, and maximum lesion diameter on MRI had an AUC of 73% on internal validation and formed the basis of the nomogram. Addition of other MRI or biopsy information did not significantly improve the model performance. Using a cutoff of 25%, the proportion of patients eligible for FT was 89% at the cost of missing 30 patients (10%) with unfavorable disease. External validation is required before the nomogram can be used in clinical practice. We report the first nomogram that improves selection criteria for FT and limits the risk of undertreatment. We conducted a study to develop a better way of selecting patients for focal therapy for localized prostate cancer. A novel predictive tool was developed using the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level measured before biopsy, tumor stage assessed via digital rectal examination, and lesion size on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. This tool improves the prediction of unfavorable disease and may reduce the risk of undertreatment of localized prostate cancer when using focal therapy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Suitable selection criteria for focal therapy (FT) are crucial to achieve success in localized prostate cancer (PCa).
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To develop a multivariable model that better delineates eligibility for FT and reduces undertreatment by predicting unfavorable disease at radical prostatectomy (RP).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS METHODS
Data were retrospectively collected from a prospective European multicenter cohort of 767 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted and systematic biopsies followed by RP in eight referral centers between 2016 and 2021. The Imperial College of London eligibility criteria for FT were applied: (1) unifocal MRI lesion with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score of 3-5; (2) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤20 ng/ml; (3) cT2-3a stage on MRI; and (4) International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (GG) 1 and ≥6 mm or GG 2-3. A total of 334 patients were included in the final analysis.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS METHODS
The primary outcome was unfavorable disease at RP, defined as GG ≥4, and/or lymph node invasion, and/or seminal vesicle invasion, and/or contralateral clinically significant PCa. Logistic regression was used to assess predictors of unfavorable disease. The performance of the models including clinical, MRI, and biopsy information was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. A coefficient-based nomogram was developed and internally validated.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
Overall, 43 patients (13%) had unfavorable disease on RP pathology. The model including PSA, clinical stage on digital rectal examination, and maximum lesion diameter on MRI had an AUC of 73% on internal validation and formed the basis of the nomogram. Addition of other MRI or biopsy information did not significantly improve the model performance. Using a cutoff of 25%, the proportion of patients eligible for FT was 89% at the cost of missing 30 patients (10%) with unfavorable disease. External validation is required before the nomogram can be used in clinical practice.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We report the first nomogram that improves selection criteria for FT and limits the risk of undertreatment.
PATIENT SUMMARY RESULTS
We conducted a study to develop a better way of selecting patients for focal therapy for localized prostate cancer. A novel predictive tool was developed using the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level measured before biopsy, tumor stage assessed via digital rectal examination, and lesion size on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. This tool improves the prediction of unfavorable disease and may reduce the risk of undertreatment of localized prostate cancer when using focal therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37147167
pii: S2405-4569(23)00105-0
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.04.008
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Georges Mjaess (G)

Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: georges.mjaess@ulb.be.

Alexandre Peltier (A)

Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Jean-Baptiste Roche (JB)

Department of Urology, Clinique Saint-Augustin, Bordeaux, France.

Elena Lievore (E)

Department of Urology, Clinique Saint-Augustin, Bordeaux, France; Department of Urology, IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy.

Vito Lacetera (V)

Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy.

Giuseppe Chiacchio (G)

Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy.

Valerio Beatrici (V)

Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy.

Riccardo Mastroianni (R)

Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

Giuseppe Simone (G)

Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

Olivier Windisch (O)

Department of Urology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.

Daniel Benamran (D)

Department of Urology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.

Alexandre Fourcade (A)

Department of Urology, Hôpital Cavale Blanche, CHRU Brest, Brest, France.

Truong An Nguyen (TA)

Department of Urology, Hôpital Cavale Blanche, CHRU Brest, Brest, France.

Georges Fournier (G)

Department of Urology, Hôpital Cavale Blanche, CHRU Brest, Brest, France.

Gaelle Fiard (G)

Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.

Guillaume Ploussard (G)

Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.

Thierry Roumeguère (T)

Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Simone Albisinni (S)

Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Romain Diamand (R)

Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH