Perceptions, beliefs, and current practices regarding neonatal skin care and emollient use in eastern Uganda: a qualitative study.
Emollient
Low birthweight
Massage
Neonatal
Neonate
Preterm
Resource-limited setting
Skincare
Uganda
Journal
BMC pediatrics
ISSN: 1471-2431
Titre abrégé: BMC Pediatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967804
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 05 2023
05 05 2023
Historique:
received:
10
10
2022
accepted:
27
04
2023
medline:
8
5
2023
pubmed:
6
5
2023
entrez:
5
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The skin is a major route of infection in the neonatal period, especially in low birthweight (LBW) infants. Appropriate and safe neonatal skin care practices are required to reduce this risk. The perceptions and beliefs of mothers and other caregivers towards various neonatal skin care practices in our setting have been documented. Data from Asia suggests that the application of emollient to the skin of LBW infants can promote growth, reduce serious neonatal infections, and potentially reduce mortality. This is the first study to explore the acceptability of emollients and massage as part of neonatal skin care in a low-resource setting in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) that is representative of the majority of government health facilities in Uganda and many in SSA. To explore perceptions, beliefs, and current practices regarding neonatal skin care and emollient use in eastern Uganda. We conducted a qualitative study consisting of three focus group discussions (30 participants), eight in-depth interviews with mothers/caregivers of preterm and term neonates and 12 key informant interviews with midwives, doctors and community health workers involved in neonatal care, to explore the perceptions and practices surrounding neonatal skin care and emollient use. Data collected were transcribed and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Mothers perceived that skin care began in utero. Skincare practices depended on the place of delivery; for deliveries in a health facility the skincare practices were mainly based on the health worker's advice. Vernix caseosa was often washed off due to its perceived undesirability and was attributed to sexual intercourse in the last trimester. Despite their deleterious attributes found in previous studies, petrolatum-based oils, petrolatum-based jellies and talcum baby powders were the most commonly reported items used in neonatal skin care. In our population, there was high acceptability of emollient therapy use; however, neonatal massage was treated with scepticism as mothers feared damaging the vulnerable neonate. Mothers suggested massage and emollient application be undertaken by health workers, if it becomes an intervention. In eastern Uganda, the perceptions and beliefs of mothers/caregivers toward neonatal skincare influenced their practices of which some could potentially be beneficial, and others harmful. Emollient use would be easily accepted if adequate sensitisation is conducted and using the gatekeepers such as health workers.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The skin is a major route of infection in the neonatal period, especially in low birthweight (LBW) infants. Appropriate and safe neonatal skin care practices are required to reduce this risk. The perceptions and beliefs of mothers and other caregivers towards various neonatal skin care practices in our setting have been documented. Data from Asia suggests that the application of emollient to the skin of LBW infants can promote growth, reduce serious neonatal infections, and potentially reduce mortality. This is the first study to explore the acceptability of emollients and massage as part of neonatal skin care in a low-resource setting in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) that is representative of the majority of government health facilities in Uganda and many in SSA.
OBJECTIVE
To explore perceptions, beliefs, and current practices regarding neonatal skin care and emollient use in eastern Uganda.
METHODS
We conducted a qualitative study consisting of three focus group discussions (30 participants), eight in-depth interviews with mothers/caregivers of preterm and term neonates and 12 key informant interviews with midwives, doctors and community health workers involved in neonatal care, to explore the perceptions and practices surrounding neonatal skin care and emollient use. Data collected were transcribed and analyzed using thematic content analysis.
RESULTS
Mothers perceived that skin care began in utero. Skincare practices depended on the place of delivery; for deliveries in a health facility the skincare practices were mainly based on the health worker's advice. Vernix caseosa was often washed off due to its perceived undesirability and was attributed to sexual intercourse in the last trimester. Despite their deleterious attributes found in previous studies, petrolatum-based oils, petrolatum-based jellies and talcum baby powders were the most commonly reported items used in neonatal skin care. In our population, there was high acceptability of emollient therapy use; however, neonatal massage was treated with scepticism as mothers feared damaging the vulnerable neonate. Mothers suggested massage and emollient application be undertaken by health workers, if it becomes an intervention.
CONCLUSIONS
In eastern Uganda, the perceptions and beliefs of mothers/caregivers toward neonatal skincare influenced their practices of which some could potentially be beneficial, and others harmful. Emollient use would be easily accepted if adequate sensitisation is conducted and using the gatekeepers such as health workers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37147698
doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04040-y
pii: 10.1186/s12887-023-04040-y
pmc: PMC10163695
doi:
Substances chimiques
Emollients
0
Petrolatum
8009-03-8
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
223Subventions
Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : R25 TW011213
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Health Popul Nutr. 2007 Jun;25(2):236-40
pubmed: 17985826
Acta Paediatr. 2002;91(5):546-54
pubmed: 12113324
Trop Med Int Health. 2010 Oct;15(10):1140-7
pubmed: 20723185
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):105
pubmed: 32131781
J Glob Health. 2022 Apr 30;12:03019
pubmed: 35486585
Indian J Med Ethics. 2019 Apr-Jun;4(2):171
pubmed: 31271356
Pediatr Dermatol. 2019 Jan;36(1):16-23
pubmed: 30548578
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Sep 4;19(1):311
pubmed: 31484567
Pediatr Res. 2003 Feb;53(2):211-6
pubmed: 12538777
Pediatrics. 2000 May;105(5):1041-5
pubmed: 10790460
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Jan;28(1):17-20
pubmed: 19034065
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Sep;178(9):1317-1324
pubmed: 31267223
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2000 Aug;47(4):757-82
pubmed: 10943256
Am J Public Health. 2020 Sep;110(9):1378-1379
pubmed: 32783735
Neonatology. 2008;94(2):123-31
pubmed: 18332641
Neonatal Netw. 1999 Jun;18(4):15-27
pubmed: 10633681
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):476
pubmed: 30514237
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Feb 23;10:9
pubmed: 20178626
Pediatr Res. 2007 May;61(5 Pt 1):588-93
pubmed: 17413870
Midwifery. 2011 Dec;27(6):775-80
pubmed: 20685016
Glob Health Action. 2015 Mar 31;8:23963
pubmed: 25843490
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 14;11:CD013534
pubmed: 36373988
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88
pubmed: 28126032
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Feb 19;3(1):e000586
pubmed: 29527347
Lancet. 2005 Mar 19-25;365(9464):1039-45
pubmed: 15781099
J Trop Pediatr. 2012 Apr;58(2):88-95
pubmed: 21558307
J Invest Dermatol. 1998 Aug;111(2):320-6
pubmed: 9699737
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 7;5:CD001150
pubmed: 33961715
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014 Nov;33(11):1124-7
pubmed: 24853544
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 17;11(11):e0166405
pubmed: 27855186
J Trop Pediatr. 2005 Apr;51(2):82-6
pubmed: 15677372
J Trop Pediatr. 2015 Dec;61(6):428-34
pubmed: 26314307
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 May;100(3):F210-5
pubmed: 25637007
J Health Popul Nutr. 2018 Apr 16;37(1):9
pubmed: 29661239