Effects of neurofeedback training on performance in laboratory tasks: A systematic review.
Behavior
EEG
Neurofeedback training
PRISMA
fMRI
Journal
International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology
ISSN: 1872-7697
Titre abrégé: Int J Psychophysiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8406214
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2023
07 2023
Historique:
received:
25
10
2022
revised:
27
04
2023
accepted:
30
04
2023
medline:
16
6
2023
pubmed:
7
5
2023
entrez:
6
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Neurofeedback procedures are attracting increasing attention in the neuroscience community. Based on the principle that participants, through suitable feedback, may learn to affect specific aspects of their brain activity, neurofeedback interventions have been applied to basic research, translational, and clinical science. A large segment of the available empirical research as well as review articles have focused on the extent to which neurofeedback interventions affect mental health outcomes, cognitive capacity, aging, and other complex behaviors. Another segment has aimed to characterize the extent to which neurofeedback affects the targeted neural processes. At this time, there is no current systematic review of the effects of neurofeedback on healthy participants' performance in experimental tasks. Such a review is relevant in this rapidly evolving field because changes in experimental task performance are traditionally considered a hallmark of changing neurocognitive processes, often established in neurotypical individuals. This systematic review addresses this gap in the literature using the PRISMA method, building on earlier reviews on the same topic. Empirical studies using EEG or fMRI to alter brain processes linked to established cognitive and affective laboratory tasks were reviewed. Systematic quality assessment and z-curve analyses were also conducted. Substantial variability was found regarding the study designs used, the implementation of the feedback, and the neural targets of feedback. Importantly, only a minority of the studies reported statistically meaningful effects of neurofeedback on performance in cognitive and affective tasks. The z-curve analyses found no evidence for reporting bias or unsound research practices. Quality control and effect size analyses showed few systematic relations between study characteristics such as sample size or experimental control on the one hand and outcome on the other. Overall, the present study does not support strong effects of NFT on performance in laboratory tasks. Implications for future work are discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37148977
pii: S0167-8760(23)00080-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2023.04.005
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
42-56Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH125615
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.