Salvage Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy: Analysis of Toxicity by Dose-Fractionation in the RADICALS-RT Trial.


Journal

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 11 2023
Historique:
received: 07 02 2023
revised: 25 04 2023
accepted: 29 04 2023
medline: 25 9 2023
pubmed: 8 5 2023
entrez: 7 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Emerging data indicate comparable disease control and toxicity of normal postoperative fractionation and moderate hypofractionation radiation therapy (RT) in prostate cancer. In RADICALS-RT, patients were planned for treatment with either 66 Gy in 33 fractions (f) over 6.5 weeks or 52.5 Gy in 20f over 4 weeks. This non-randomized, exploratory analysis explored the toxicity of these 2 schedules in patients who had adjuvant RT. Information on RT dose was collected in all patients. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity score was recorded every 4 months for 2 years, every 6 months until 5 years, then annually until 15 years. Patient-reported data were collected at baseline and at 1, 5, and 10 years using standard measures, including the Vaizey fecal incontinence score (bowel) and the International Continence Society Male Short-Form questionnaire (urinary incontinence). The highest event grade was recorded within the first 2 years and beyond 2 years and compared between treatment groups using the χ² test. Of 634 patients, 217 (34%) were planned for 52.5 Gy/20f and 417 (66%) for 66 Gy/33f. In the first 2 years, grade 1 to 2 cystitis was reported more frequently among the 66 Gy/33f group (52.5 Gy/20f: 20% vs 66 Gy/33f: 30%; P = .04). After 2 years, grade 1 to 2 cystitis was reported in 16% in the 66-Gy group and 9% in the 52.5-Gy group (P = .08). Other toxic effects were similar in the 2 groups, and very few patients had any grade 3 to 4 toxic effects. Patients reported slightly higher urinary and fecal incontinence scores at 1 year than at baseline, but no clinically meaningful differences were reported between the 52.5 Gy/20f and 66 Gy/33f groups. Patient-reported health was similar at baseline and at 1 year and similar between the 52.5 Gy/20f and 66 Gy/33f groups. Severe toxic effects were rare after prostate bed radiation therapy with either 52.5 Gy/20f or 66 Gy/33f. Only modest differences were recorded in toxic effects or in patient-reported outcomes between these 2 schedules.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37150260
pii: S0360-3016(23)00435-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.04.032
pmc: PMC7615125
mid: EMS181097
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

624-629

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 6381
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00004/02
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12023/28
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 10;34(20):2325-32
pubmed: 27044935
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Apr 1;109(5):1263-1270
pubmed: 33346091
Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1422-1431
pubmed: 33002431
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):e17-24
pubmed: 21324610
Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1024-30
pubmed: 24985964
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1341-1352
pubmed: 33002438
Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1413-1421
pubmed: 33002429
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Apr 1;109(5):1254-1262
pubmed: 33227441
Eur Urol. 2021 Sep;80(3):306-315
pubmed: 34140144
Lancet. 2022 May 14;399(10338):1886-1901
pubmed: 35569466
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jan 1;85(1):89-94
pubmed: 22652106
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1331-1340
pubmed: 33002437
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 10;35(17):1884-1890
pubmed: 28296582
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1047-1060
pubmed: 27339115
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul 20;37(21):1828-1835
pubmed: 31163009

Auteurs

Peter Meidahl Petersen (PM)

Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: Peter.meidahl.petersen@regionh.dk.

Adrian D Cook (AD)

Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Matthew R Sydes (MR)

Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Noel Clarke (N)

Department of Urology, The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester University, Manchester, United Kingdom.

William Cross (W)

Department of Urology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Howard Kynaston (H)

University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

John Logue (J)

Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Peter Neville (P)

Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Heather Payne (H)

University College London, The Prostate Centre, London, United Kingdom.

Mahesh K B Parmar (MKB)

Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Wendy Parulekar (W)

Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Rajendra Persad (R)

Bristol Urological Institute, North Bristol Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Fred Saad (F)

Urologic Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Alan Stirling (A)

Castle Hill Hospital, Castle Road, Cottingham, United Kingdom.

Christopher C Parker (CC)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS, Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom.

Charles Catton (C)

Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH