Endodontic Rotary Systems: Comparison between Gentlefile and Pro Taper Universal for removal of
Journal
Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry
ISSN: 1989-5488
Titre abrégé: J Clin Exp Dent
Pays: Spain
ID NLM: 101603132
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
30
10
2022
accepted:
07
12
2022
medline:
8
5
2023
pubmed:
8
5
2023
entrez:
8
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
As a resistant bacterium species in infected root canals, Forty single-root premolar teeth were collected and randomly divided into two groups: Gentlefile (n=18) and Pro Taper Universal (n=18). In addition, four teeth were used as a negative control. The root canals were prepared and infected with E. faecalis and incubated for 4 weeks. Samples were obtained from the root canal immediately before and after instrumentation. A reduction in bacteria was determined by the colony count method. Colony numbers of E. faecalis were significantly different before and after instrumentation in all groups ( Although both rotary systems were highly effective in bacterial reduction from root canals, Gentlefile demonstrated better bacterial reduction percentage from root canals than Pro Taper Universal.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
As a resistant bacterium species in infected root canals,
Material and Methods
UNASSIGNED
Forty single-root premolar teeth were collected and randomly divided into two groups: Gentlefile (n=18) and Pro Taper Universal (n=18). In addition, four teeth were used as a negative control. The root canals were prepared and infected with E. faecalis and incubated for 4 weeks. Samples were obtained from the root canal immediately before and after instrumentation. A reduction in bacteria was determined by the colony count method.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Colony numbers of E. faecalis were significantly different before and after instrumentation in all groups (
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Although both rotary systems were highly effective in bacterial reduction from root canals, Gentlefile demonstrated better bacterial reduction percentage from root canals than Pro Taper Universal.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37152499
doi: 10.4317/jced.60147
pii: 60147
pmc: PMC10155944
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e277-e280Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Medicina Oral S.L.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of interest All authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Références
J Endod. 2014 Oct;40(10):1638-41
pubmed: 25260737
Braz Oral Res. 2019;33:e039
pubmed: 31508729
Int Endod J. 2018 Jul;51(7):800-807
pubmed: 29363136
J Endod. 2014 May;40(5):625-9
pubmed: 24767554
Int Endod J. 2001 Apr;34(3):221-30
pubmed: 12193268
Scand J Dent Res. 1982 Apr;90(2):134-44
pubmed: 6951255
Int Endod J. 2013 Nov;46(11):1083-7
pubmed: 23566213
J Investig Clin Dent. 2016 May;7(2):168-73
pubmed: 25424649
J Endod. 2011 Jun;37(6):758-63
pubmed: 21787484
J Conserv Dent. 2020 May-Jun;23(3):314-318
pubmed: 33551607
Int Endod J. 2018 May;51(5):501-508
pubmed: 28196289
Braz Dent J. 2017 Sep-Oct;28(5):587-591
pubmed: 29215683
Int Endod J. 2005 Oct;38(10):735-42
pubmed: 16164688
Int Endod J. 2004 Apr;37(4):239-48
pubmed: 15056350
J Endod. 2020 Jul;46(7):973-979
pubmed: 32418616
J Endod. 2010 Jul;36(7):1238-40
pubmed: 20630307
J Endod. 2009 Jul;35(7):1056-9
pubmed: 19567334
J Endod. 2016 Mar;42(3):505-8
pubmed: 26831050
Braz Oral Res. 2018 Oct 18;32(suppl 1):e65
pubmed: 30365606