Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up "No Show": A Quality Improvement Project.
factors
healthcare seeking practices
no show
outpatient follow up
rescheduling
stroke clinic
stroke patients
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
accepted:
03
04
2023
medline:
8
5
2023
pubmed:
8
5
2023
entrez:
8
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Objective Controlling modifiable risk factors provides a strong impact on secondary stroke prevention. Stroke outpatient follow-up (OPFU) provides a significant role in assuring these goals are met. However, in our institute in 2018, one out of four patients was not seen in the stroke clinic after their stroke. To increase this ratio, we instituted a performance improvement project (PIP) to determine factors that contribute to OPFU and offered rescheduling after their missed appointment. Methods The nurse scheduler called patients labeled as "no-show," asked for reasons for the missed appointment, and offered rescheduling accordingly. Other data were collected retrospectively. Results Of the 53 "no show" patients, most were females, single, Black, uninsured, and had a Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) of 0. Of the 30 patients who participated in the phone interview, a most common reason for "no show" was transportation. Fifteen out of 27 patients kept their rescheduled appointment, increasing patients seen in the clinic by 6.7%. Conclusion This PIP determined contributing factors on health care seeking practices of our stroke clinic patients allowing necessary improvements in our institute. Rescheduling increased the number of stroke patients seen in the stroke clinic. Our general neurology ambulatory department consequently adopted this process as well.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37153290
doi: 10.7759/cureus.37105
pmc: PMC10158797
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e37105Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, San Luis et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Fam Pract. 2002 Aug;19(4):378-82
pubmed: 12110559
Stroke. 2014 Jul;45(7):2160-236
pubmed: 24788967
Health Policy. 1997 Nov;42(2):101-15
pubmed: 10175619
J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Apr;102(4):276-89
pubmed: 20437735
Psychosoc Med. 2012;9:Doc11
pubmed: 23133505
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 16;10(10):e0139997
pubmed: 26474055
Med Care. 2009 Nov;47(11):1136-46
pubmed: 19786920
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1999 May;10(2):186-200
pubmed: 10224825
Stroke. 1993 Jan;24(1):35-41
pubmed: 7678184