Predictive value of Heart Rate Variability measurements and the Brief Resilience Scale for workability and vitality.
Prospective
occupational health
primary prevention
resilience
Journal
Work (Reading, Mass.)
ISSN: 1875-9270
Titre abrégé: Work
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9204382
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
medline:
14
11
2023
pubmed:
8
5
2023
entrez:
8
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Sustainable employability is increasingly important with current socio-economic challenges. Screening for resilience could contribute to early detection of either a risk, or a protector for sustainable employability, the latter being operationalized as workability and vitality. To study the predictive value of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) measurements and the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) for worker self-reported workability and vitality after 2-4 years. Prospective observational cohort study with mean follow-up period of 38 months. 1,624 workers (18-65 years old) in moderate and large companies participated. Resilience was measured by HRV (one-minute paced deep breathing protocol) and the BRS at baseline. Workability Index (WAI), and the Vitality dimension of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-9 (UWES-9-vitality) were the outcome measures. Backward stepwise multiple regression analysis (p < 0.05) was performed to evaluate the predictive value of resilience for workability and vitality, adjusted for body mass index, age and gender. N = 428 workers met inclusion criteria after follow-up. The contribution of resilience, measured with the BRS, was modest but statistically significant for the prediction of vitality (R2 = 7.3%) and workability (R2 = 9.2%). HRV did not contribute to prediction of workability or vitality. Age was the only significant covariate in the WAI model. Self-reported resilience modestly predicted workability and vitality after 2-4 years. Self-reported resilience may provide early insight into the ability of workers to stay at work, although caution must be applied because explained variance was modest. HRV was not predictive.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Sustainable employability is increasingly important with current socio-economic challenges. Screening for resilience could contribute to early detection of either a risk, or a protector for sustainable employability, the latter being operationalized as workability and vitality.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To study the predictive value of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) measurements and the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) for worker self-reported workability and vitality after 2-4 years.
METHODS
METHODS
Prospective observational cohort study with mean follow-up period of 38 months. 1,624 workers (18-65 years old) in moderate and large companies participated. Resilience was measured by HRV (one-minute paced deep breathing protocol) and the BRS at baseline. Workability Index (WAI), and the Vitality dimension of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-9 (UWES-9-vitality) were the outcome measures. Backward stepwise multiple regression analysis (p < 0.05) was performed to evaluate the predictive value of resilience for workability and vitality, adjusted for body mass index, age and gender.
RESULTS
RESULTS
N = 428 workers met inclusion criteria after follow-up. The contribution of resilience, measured with the BRS, was modest but statistically significant for the prediction of vitality (R2 = 7.3%) and workability (R2 = 9.2%). HRV did not contribute to prediction of workability or vitality. Age was the only significant covariate in the WAI model.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Self-reported resilience modestly predicted workability and vitality after 2-4 years. Self-reported resilience may provide early insight into the ability of workers to stay at work, although caution must be applied because explained variance was modest. HRV was not predictive.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37154192
pii: WOR220366
doi: 10.3233/WOR-220366
pmc: PMC10657665
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1007-1017Références
Arch Med Sci. 2010 Mar 1;6(1):11-8
pubmed: 22371714
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Jun;100(6):2443-8
pubmed: 26047073
Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):1043-65
pubmed: 8598068
Prev Med. 2021 Jul;148:106565
pubmed: 33878348
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 03;16(13):
pubmed: 31277333
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 13;13(2):e0192761
pubmed: 29438435
Work. 2016 May 24;54(2):325-33
pubmed: 27232059
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Sep 1;44(5):475-484
pubmed: 29870047
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009 Jan;35(1):1-5
pubmed: 19277432
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):5-14
pubmed: 32869106
Cleve Clin J Med. 2009 Apr;76 Suppl 2:S37-40
pubmed: 19376980
J Occup Health. 2019 May;61(3):242-250
pubmed: 30903648
J Occup Rehabil. 2002 Sep;12(3):119-29
pubmed: 12228943
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2019 Jun;44(2):83-96
pubmed: 30506478
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Feb 04;9:8
pubmed: 21294858
Biol Psychol. 2013 May;93(2):279-86
pubmed: 23466587
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 14;8(6):e017858
pubmed: 29903782
Occup Environ Med. 2009 Apr;66(4):211-20
pubmed: 19017690
Int J Psychophysiol. 2016 Dec;110:171-178
pubmed: 27535344
Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194-200
pubmed: 18696313
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020 Jan 1;46(1):77-84
pubmed: 31419303
Spine J. 2019 Feb;19(2):232-237
pubmed: 29906617
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Sep;29(3):503-513
pubmed: 30178434
PLoS One. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0126969
pubmed: 26017387
Circulation. 2000 Sep 12;102(11):1239-44
pubmed: 10982537
Occup Med (Lond). 2009 Jan;59(1):32-7
pubmed: 19073989
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Apr;16(4):302-8
pubmed: 23574369
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 05;11:605684
pubmed: 33613362
Work. 2015;52(1):45-55
pubmed: 25248527
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Sep;25(3):618-26
pubmed: 25678067
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 12;6(1):e010091
pubmed: 26758267
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Mar 1;31(3):593-601
pubmed: 9502641