Comparison of antibody responses following natural infection with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 or receipt of CoronaVac or ChAdOx1 (AZD1222) vaccination in Chiang Mai, Thailand.

ChAdOx1 CoronaVac Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Neutralizing antibodies Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

Journal

Vaccine: X
ISSN: 2590-1362
Titre abrégé: Vaccine X
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101748769

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 01 11 2022
revised: 12 04 2023
accepted: 14 04 2023
medline: 8 5 2023
pubmed: 8 5 2023
entrez: 8 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In Thailand, early vaccination initiatives for SARS-CoV-2 relied on CoronaVac (Sinovac Life Sciences) and ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines. However, the data of immunogenicity of these two vaccines in Thai populations is limited. This real time, head-to-head comparative study was conducted to investigate antibody (Ab) responses to SARS-CoV-2 following infection or receipt of either CoronaVac or ChAdOx1 vaccination in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Sera was collected within two months from participants having a history of documented SARS-CoV-2 infection or at one month after the second dose of CoronaVac vaccine. Sera from participants with a history of receiving one dose of ChAdOx1 vaccination was collected twice, at one month following each vaccine dose. Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were assessed using the surrogate neutralization test and anti-spike protein antibodies were assessed using an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The prevalence of NAbs against SARS-CoV-2 was 92.1 %, 95.7 %, 64.1 % and 100 % in the infection group, CoronaVac group, ChAdOx1 group after 1st dose, and ChAdOx1 group after 2nd dose, respectively. The inhibition rate in individuals receiving two doses of ChAdOx1 vaccine (90.8%) was significantly higher than individuals who had recovered from natural infection (71.7%) or individuals who had received two doses of CoronaVac vaccine (66.7%). The prevalence of anti-spike Abs was 97.4 %, 97.8 %, 97.4 % and 100 % in the infection group, CoronaVac group, ChAdOx1 group after 1st dose, and ChAdOx1 group after 2nd dose, respectively. Significantly higher levels of anti-spike Abs were observed in the ChAdOx1 group after two doses of vaccination (1975 AU/mL) compared to those who had recovered from natural infection (468.5 AU/mL) and individuals who had received CoronaVac (554.4 AU/mL). Neutralizing activity had a statistically significant positive correlation with levels of anti-spike Abs. ChAdOx1 vaccine may provide superior immunogenicity than CoronaVac and natural infection.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
In Thailand, early vaccination initiatives for SARS-CoV-2 relied on CoronaVac (Sinovac Life Sciences) and ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines. However, the data of immunogenicity of these two vaccines in Thai populations is limited. This real time, head-to-head comparative study was conducted to investigate antibody (Ab) responses to SARS-CoV-2 following infection or receipt of either CoronaVac or ChAdOx1 vaccination in Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Sera was collected within two months from participants having a history of documented SARS-CoV-2 infection or at one month after the second dose of CoronaVac vaccine. Sera from participants with a history of receiving one dose of ChAdOx1 vaccination was collected twice, at one month following each vaccine dose. Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were assessed using the surrogate neutralization test and anti-spike protein antibodies were assessed using an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Results UNASSIGNED
The prevalence of NAbs against SARS-CoV-2 was 92.1 %, 95.7 %, 64.1 % and 100 % in the infection group, CoronaVac group, ChAdOx1 group after 1st dose, and ChAdOx1 group after 2nd dose, respectively. The inhibition rate in individuals receiving two doses of ChAdOx1 vaccine (90.8%) was significantly higher than individuals who had recovered from natural infection (71.7%) or individuals who had received two doses of CoronaVac vaccine (66.7%). The prevalence of anti-spike Abs was 97.4 %, 97.8 %, 97.4 % and 100 % in the infection group, CoronaVac group, ChAdOx1 group after 1st dose, and ChAdOx1 group after 2nd dose, respectively. Significantly higher levels of anti-spike Abs were observed in the ChAdOx1 group after two doses of vaccination (1975 AU/mL) compared to those who had recovered from natural infection (468.5 AU/mL) and individuals who had received CoronaVac (554.4 AU/mL). Neutralizing activity had a statistically significant positive correlation with levels of anti-spike Abs.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
ChAdOx1 vaccine may provide superior immunogenicity than CoronaVac and natural infection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37155476
doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100305
pii: S2590-1362(23)00046-3
pmc: PMC10119672
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100305

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;21(10):1352-1354
pubmed: 34454652
Vaccine. 2022 Apr 20;40(18):2619-2625
pubmed: 35339303
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 6;10(1):16602
pubmed: 33024144
Nature. 2022 Feb;602(7898):671-675
pubmed: 35016199
N Engl J Med. 2022 Apr 21;386(16):1532-1546
pubmed: 35249272
J Med Virol. 2022 Mar;94(3):1060-1066
pubmed: 34704620
J Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 17;226(8):1372-1381
pubmed: 35267040
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Oct;2(10):e527-e535
pubmed: 34258603
J Med Virol. 2022 Mar;94(3):1217-1223
pubmed: 34647623
Lancet Microbe. 2022 Apr;3(4):e274-e283
pubmed: 35165669
Lancet. 2021 Mar 6;397(10277):881-891
pubmed: 33617777
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 9;15(10):e0240502
pubmed: 33035234
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 May 27;10(6):
pubmed: 35746467
ACS Cent Sci. 2021 Apr 28;7(4):512-533
pubmed: 34056083
Lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):981-990
pubmed: 34480858
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Nov 29;36(46):e311
pubmed: 34845875
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733
pubmed: 31978945
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Dec 14;9(12):
pubmed: 34960224
Vaccine X. 2022 Mar 05;10:100153
pubmed: 35282410
Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines. 2022 Jan 15;8(1):2
pubmed: 35031076
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jan 03;10(1):
pubmed: 35062734
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;114:165-174
pubmed: 34688944
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2021 Oct;67(10):1403-1408
pubmed: 35018966

Auteurs

Sayamon Hongjaisee (S)

Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Kriangkrai Chawansuntati (K)

Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Patumrat Sripan (P)

Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Kritsadee Rattanathammethee (K)

Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Supachai Sakkhachornphop (S)

Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Romanee Chaiwarith (R)

Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Tavitiya Sudjaritruk (T)

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Khuanchai Supparatpinyo (K)

Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Jiraprapa Wipasa (J)

Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Classifications MeSH