Intrathecal trastuzumab versus alternate routes of delivery for HER2-targeted therapies in patients with HER2+ breast cancer leptomeningeal metastases.


Journal

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)
ISSN: 1532-3080
Titre abrégé: Breast
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9213011

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 03 02 2023
revised: 07 04 2023
accepted: 30 04 2023
medline: 16 6 2023
pubmed: 9 5 2023
entrez: 8 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patients with HER2+ breast cancer (BC) frequently develop leptomeningeal metastases (LM). While HER2-targeted therapies have demonstrated efficacy in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings, including for parenchymal brain metastases, their efficacy for patients with LM has not been studied in a randomized controlled trial. However, several single-armed prospective studies, case series and case reports have studied oral, intravenous, or intrathecally administered HER2-targeted therapy regimens for patients with HER2+ BC LM. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data to evaluate the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapies in HER2+ BC LM in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Targeted therapies evaluated were trastuzumab (intrathecal or intravenous), pertuzumab, lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib, trastuzumab-emtansine and trastuzumab-deruxtecan. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with CNS-specific progression-free survival (PFS) as a secondary endpoint. 7780 abstracts were screened, identifying 45 publications with 208 patients, corresponding to 275 lines of HER2-targeted therapy for BC LM which met inclusion criteria. In univariable and multivariable analyses, we observed no significant difference in OS and CNS-specific PFS between intrathecal trastuzumab compared to oral or intravenous administration of HER2-targeted therapy. Anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody-based regimens did not demonstrate superiority over HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In a cohort of 15 patients, treatment with trastuzumab-deruxtecan was associated with prolonged OS compared to other HER2-targeted therapies and compared to trastuzumab-emtansine. The results of this meta-analysis, comprising the limited data available, suggest that intrathecal administration of HER2-targeted therapy for patients with HER2+ BC LM confers no additional benefit over oral and/or IV treatment regimens. Although the number of patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan in this cohort is small, this novel agent offers promise for this patient population and requires further investigation in prospective studies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Patients with HER2+ breast cancer (BC) frequently develop leptomeningeal metastases (LM). While HER2-targeted therapies have demonstrated efficacy in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings, including for parenchymal brain metastases, their efficacy for patients with LM has not been studied in a randomized controlled trial. However, several single-armed prospective studies, case series and case reports have studied oral, intravenous, or intrathecally administered HER2-targeted therapy regimens for patients with HER2+ BC LM.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data to evaluate the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapies in HER2+ BC LM in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Targeted therapies evaluated were trastuzumab (intrathecal or intravenous), pertuzumab, lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib, trastuzumab-emtansine and trastuzumab-deruxtecan. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with CNS-specific progression-free survival (PFS) as a secondary endpoint.
RESULTS RESULTS
7780 abstracts were screened, identifying 45 publications with 208 patients, corresponding to 275 lines of HER2-targeted therapy for BC LM which met inclusion criteria. In univariable and multivariable analyses, we observed no significant difference in OS and CNS-specific PFS between intrathecal trastuzumab compared to oral or intravenous administration of HER2-targeted therapy. Anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody-based regimens did not demonstrate superiority over HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In a cohort of 15 patients, treatment with trastuzumab-deruxtecan was associated with prolonged OS compared to other HER2-targeted therapies and compared to trastuzumab-emtansine.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The results of this meta-analysis, comprising the limited data available, suggest that intrathecal administration of HER2-targeted therapy for patients with HER2+ BC LM confers no additional benefit over oral and/or IV treatment regimens. Although the number of patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan in this cohort is small, this novel agent offers promise for this patient population and requires further investigation in prospective studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37156650
pii: S0960-9776(23)00450-2
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.04.008
pmc: PMC10300571
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine SE2KH7T06F
Receptor, ErbB-2 EC 2.7.10.1
Trastuzumab P188ANX8CK

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

451-468

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 Aug;6:e2200107
pubmed: 35977349
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 12;12(1):5954
pubmed: 34642329
Neuro Oncol. 2022 Oct 3;24(10):1726-1735
pubmed: 35157772
J Pharm Technol. 2014 Apr;30(2):43-47
pubmed: 34860873
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 1;37(13):1081-1089
pubmed: 30860945
Can J Neurol Sci. 2019 May;46(3):358-359
pubmed: 30905325
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov 20;40(33):3858-3867
pubmed: 35802849
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2022 Apr;5(4):e1274
pubmed: 32881421
Nat Med. 2023 Apr;29(4):898-905
pubmed: 36997799
Neuro Oncol. 2023 Mar 14;25(3):557-565
pubmed: 35948282
J Infect. 2014 Mar;68(3):216-24
pubmed: 24360921
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 Nov;18(11):696-714
pubmed: 34253912
Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55
pubmed: 7165009
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64
pubmed: 19622511
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jul;110(1):210-219
pubmed: 33547646
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023 Mar 30;9(1):19
pubmed: 36997605
J Neurooncol. 2022 Apr;157(2):249-269
pubmed: 35244835
Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30
pubmed: 21603045
Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 Feb;17(1):23-28
pubmed: 27569275
Eur J Cancer. 2018 May;95:75-84
pubmed: 29635147
Neuro Oncol. 2023 Feb 14;25(2):365-374
pubmed: 35868630
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1280-1284
pubmed: 32483359
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 20;386(3):241-251
pubmed: 34534430
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 10;13(4):
pubmed: 33578853
Int J Cancer. 2022 Oct 15;151(8):1355-1366
pubmed: 35666525
Nat Med. 2022 Sep;28(9):1840-1847
pubmed: 35941372
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Apr;23(2):60-63
pubmed: 29420178
Neuro Oncol. 2023 Jan 5;25(1):157-166
pubmed: 35639825
Anticancer Drugs. 2007 Jan;18(1):23-8
pubmed: 17159499
J Infect. 2014 Mar;68(3):225-30
pubmed: 24321561
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 7;387(1):9-20
pubmed: 35665782
Neuro Oncol. 2019 May 6;21(5):648-658
pubmed: 30715514
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 13;382(7):597-609
pubmed: 31825569
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 1;25(13):3784-3792
pubmed: 30988080
J Neurooncol. 2013 May;113(1):83-92
pubmed: 23456656

Auteurs

Anna-Maria Lazaratos (AM)

Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Sarah M Maritan (SM)

Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Andrea Quaiattini (A)

Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Amelie Darlix (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, INSERM, CNRS, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Ivica Ratosa (I)

Division of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Emanuela Ferraro (E)

Breast Cancer Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NewYork, USA.

Gaia Griguolo (G)

Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Valentina Guarneri (V)

Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Alessia Pellerino (A)

Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy.

Silvia Hofer (S)

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.

William Jacot (W)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Hans-Joachim Stemmler (HJ)

Medical Dept. III, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munchen, Germany.

Marcel P H van den Broek (MPH)

Clinical Pharmacy, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.

Nika Dobnikar (N)

Division of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Francois Panet (F)

Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Zubin Lahijanian (Z)

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Aki Morikawa (A)

Breast Cancer Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NewYork, USA.

Andrew D Seidman (AD)

Breast Cancer Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NewYork, USA.

Riccardo Soffietti (R)

Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy.

Lawrence Panasci (L)

Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Kevin Petrecca (K)

Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

April A N Rose (AAN)

Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Lady Davis Institute, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Nathaniel Bouganim (N)

Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Matthew Dankner (M)

Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: matthew.dankner@mail.mcgill.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH