Intrathecal trastuzumab versus alternate routes of delivery for HER2-targeted therapies in patients with HER2+ breast cancer leptomeningeal metastases.
Female
Humans
Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Prospective Studies
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Trastuzumab
/ administration & dosage
Meningeal Neoplasms
/ secondary
Breast cancer
Deruxtecan
Intrathecal
Leptomeningeal
Trastuzumab
Journal
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)
ISSN: 1532-3080
Titre abrégé: Breast
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9213011
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
03
02
2023
revised:
07
04
2023
accepted:
30
04
2023
medline:
16
6
2023
pubmed:
9
5
2023
entrez:
8
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with HER2+ breast cancer (BC) frequently develop leptomeningeal metastases (LM). While HER2-targeted therapies have demonstrated efficacy in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings, including for parenchymal brain metastases, their efficacy for patients with LM has not been studied in a randomized controlled trial. However, several single-armed prospective studies, case series and case reports have studied oral, intravenous, or intrathecally administered HER2-targeted therapy regimens for patients with HER2+ BC LM. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data to evaluate the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapies in HER2+ BC LM in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Targeted therapies evaluated were trastuzumab (intrathecal or intravenous), pertuzumab, lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib, trastuzumab-emtansine and trastuzumab-deruxtecan. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with CNS-specific progression-free survival (PFS) as a secondary endpoint. 7780 abstracts were screened, identifying 45 publications with 208 patients, corresponding to 275 lines of HER2-targeted therapy for BC LM which met inclusion criteria. In univariable and multivariable analyses, we observed no significant difference in OS and CNS-specific PFS between intrathecal trastuzumab compared to oral or intravenous administration of HER2-targeted therapy. Anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody-based regimens did not demonstrate superiority over HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In a cohort of 15 patients, treatment with trastuzumab-deruxtecan was associated with prolonged OS compared to other HER2-targeted therapies and compared to trastuzumab-emtansine. The results of this meta-analysis, comprising the limited data available, suggest that intrathecal administration of HER2-targeted therapy for patients with HER2+ BC LM confers no additional benefit over oral and/or IV treatment regimens. Although the number of patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan in this cohort is small, this novel agent offers promise for this patient population and requires further investigation in prospective studies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Patients with HER2+ breast cancer (BC) frequently develop leptomeningeal metastases (LM). While HER2-targeted therapies have demonstrated efficacy in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings, including for parenchymal brain metastases, their efficacy for patients with LM has not been studied in a randomized controlled trial. However, several single-armed prospective studies, case series and case reports have studied oral, intravenous, or intrathecally administered HER2-targeted therapy regimens for patients with HER2+ BC LM.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data to evaluate the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapies in HER2+ BC LM in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Targeted therapies evaluated were trastuzumab (intrathecal or intravenous), pertuzumab, lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib, trastuzumab-emtansine and trastuzumab-deruxtecan. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with CNS-specific progression-free survival (PFS) as a secondary endpoint.
RESULTS
RESULTS
7780 abstracts were screened, identifying 45 publications with 208 patients, corresponding to 275 lines of HER2-targeted therapy for BC LM which met inclusion criteria. In univariable and multivariable analyses, we observed no significant difference in OS and CNS-specific PFS between intrathecal trastuzumab compared to oral or intravenous administration of HER2-targeted therapy. Anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody-based regimens did not demonstrate superiority over HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In a cohort of 15 patients, treatment with trastuzumab-deruxtecan was associated with prolonged OS compared to other HER2-targeted therapies and compared to trastuzumab-emtansine.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this meta-analysis, comprising the limited data available, suggest that intrathecal administration of HER2-targeted therapy for patients with HER2+ BC LM confers no additional benefit over oral and/or IV treatment regimens. Although the number of patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan in this cohort is small, this novel agent offers promise for this patient population and requires further investigation in prospective studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37156650
pii: S0960-9776(23)00450-2
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.04.008
pmc: PMC10300571
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine
SE2KH7T06F
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Trastuzumab
P188ANX8CK
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
451-468Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 Aug;6:e2200107
pubmed: 35977349
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 12;12(1):5954
pubmed: 34642329
Neuro Oncol. 2022 Oct 3;24(10):1726-1735
pubmed: 35157772
J Pharm Technol. 2014 Apr;30(2):43-47
pubmed: 34860873
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 1;37(13):1081-1089
pubmed: 30860945
Can J Neurol Sci. 2019 May;46(3):358-359
pubmed: 30905325
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov 20;40(33):3858-3867
pubmed: 35802849
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2022 Apr;5(4):e1274
pubmed: 32881421
Nat Med. 2023 Apr;29(4):898-905
pubmed: 36997799
Neuro Oncol. 2023 Mar 14;25(3):557-565
pubmed: 35948282
J Infect. 2014 Mar;68(3):216-24
pubmed: 24360921
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 Nov;18(11):696-714
pubmed: 34253912
Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55
pubmed: 7165009
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64
pubmed: 19622511
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jul;110(1):210-219
pubmed: 33547646
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023 Mar 30;9(1):19
pubmed: 36997605
J Neurooncol. 2022 Apr;157(2):249-269
pubmed: 35244835
Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30
pubmed: 21603045
Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 Feb;17(1):23-28
pubmed: 27569275
Eur J Cancer. 2018 May;95:75-84
pubmed: 29635147
Neuro Oncol. 2023 Feb 14;25(2):365-374
pubmed: 35868630
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1280-1284
pubmed: 32483359
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 20;386(3):241-251
pubmed: 34534430
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 10;13(4):
pubmed: 33578853
Int J Cancer. 2022 Oct 15;151(8):1355-1366
pubmed: 35666525
Nat Med. 2022 Sep;28(9):1840-1847
pubmed: 35941372
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Apr;23(2):60-63
pubmed: 29420178
Neuro Oncol. 2023 Jan 5;25(1):157-166
pubmed: 35639825
Anticancer Drugs. 2007 Jan;18(1):23-8
pubmed: 17159499
J Infect. 2014 Mar;68(3):225-30
pubmed: 24321561
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 7;387(1):9-20
pubmed: 35665782
Neuro Oncol. 2019 May 6;21(5):648-658
pubmed: 30715514
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 13;382(7):597-609
pubmed: 31825569
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 1;25(13):3784-3792
pubmed: 30988080
J Neurooncol. 2013 May;113(1):83-92
pubmed: 23456656