Prognostic impact of artificial intelligence-based fully automated global circumferential strain in patients undergoing stress CMR.
artificial intelligence
cardiovascular magnetic resonance
fully automated method
global circumferential strain
prognosis
stress testing
Journal
European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging
ISSN: 2047-2412
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101573788
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 08 2023
23 08 2023
Historique:
received:
01
03
2023
revised:
11
03
2023
accepted:
24
04
2023
medline:
24
8
2023
pubmed:
9
5
2023
entrez:
9
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine whether fully automated artificial intelligence-based global circumferential strain (GCS) assessed during vasodilator stress cardiovascular (CV) magnetic resonance (CMR) can provide incremental prognostic value. Between 2016 and 2018, a longitudinal study included all consecutive patients with abnormal stress CMR defined by the presence of inducible ischaemia and/or late gadolinium enhancement. Control subjects with normal stress CMR were selected using a propensity score-matching. Stress-GCS was assessed using a fully automatic machine-learning algorithm based on featured-tracking imaging from short-axis cine images. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse clinical events (MACE) defined as CV mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Cox regressions evaluated the association between stress-GCS and the primary outcome after adjustment for traditional prognosticators. In 2152 patients [66 ± 12 years, 77% men, 1:1 matched patients (1076 with normal and 1076 with abnormal CMR)], stress-GCS was associated with MACE [median follow-up 5.2 (4.8-5.5) years] after adjustment for risk factors in the propensity-matched population [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 1.12 (95% CI, 1.06-1.18)], and patients with normal CMR [adjusted HR, 1.35 (95% CI, 1.19-1.53), both P < 0.001], but not in patients with abnormal CMR (P = 0.058). In patients with normal CMR, an increased stress-GCS showed the best improvement in model discrimination and reclassification above traditional and stress CMR findings (C-statistic improvement: 0.14; NRI = 0.430; IDI = 0.089, all P < 0.001; LR-test P < 0.001). Stress-GCS is not a predictor of MACE in patients with ischaemia, but has an incremental prognostic value in those with a normal CMR although the absolute event rate remains low.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37159403
pii: 7158474
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jead100
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Gadolinium
AU0V1LM3JT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1269-1279Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: Solenn Toupin, Teodora Chitiboi, and Puneet Sharma are employees of Siemens Healthcare. Other authors declare that they have no competing interests.