Practice patterns of the medical evaluation of living liver donors in the United States.

Journal

Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society
ISSN: 1527-6473
Titre abrégé: Liver Transpl
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100909185

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Oct 2022
Historique:
received: 01 07 2022
accepted: 02 09 2022
medline: 10 5 2023
pubmed: 10 5 2023
entrez: 9 5 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) can help address the growing organ shortage in the United States, yet little is known about the current practice patterns in the medical evaluation of living liver donors. We conducted a 131-question survey of all 53 active LDLT transplant programs in the United States to assess current LDLT practices. The response rate was 100%. Donor acceptance rate was 0.33 with an interquartile range of 0.33-0.54 across all centers. Areas of high intercenter agreement included minimum age cutoff of 18 years (73.6%) and the exclusion of those with greater than Class 1 obesity (body mass index, 30.0-34.9 m/kg 2 ) (88.4%). Diabetes mellitus was not an absolute exclusion at most centers (61.5%). Selective liver biopsies were performed for steatosis or iron overload on imaging (67.9% and 62.3%, respectively) or for elevated liver enzymes (60.4%). Steatohepatitis is considered an exclusion at most centers (84.9%). The most common hypercoagulable tests performed were factor V Leiden (FVL) (88.5%), protein C (73.1%), protein S (71.2%), antithrombin III (71.2%) and prothrombin gene mutation (65.4%). At 41.5% of centers, donors were allowed to proceed with donation with FVL heterozygote status. Most programs discontinue oral contraceptive pills at least 28 days prior to surgery. At most centers, the need for cardiovascular ischemic risk testing is based on age (73.6%) and the presence of one or more cardiac risk factors (68.0%). Defining areas of practice consensus and variation underscores the need for data generation to develop evidence-based guidance for the evaluation and risk assessment of living liver donors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37160068
doi: 10.1002/lt.26571
pii: 01445473-990000000-00038
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

164-171

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Auteurs

Whitney E Jackson (WE)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAurora Colorado USA.
Colorado Center for Transplantation Care Research and EducationAurora Colorado USA.

Alyson Kaplan (A)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Weill Cornell Medicine New York New YorkUSA.

Jessica L Saben (JL)

Colorado Center for Transplantation Care Research and EducationAurora Colorado USA.
Department of Surgery University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAurora Colorado USA.

Michael S Kriss (MS)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAurora Colorado USA.
Colorado Center for Transplantation Care Research and EducationAurora Colorado USA.

Jaime Cisek (J)

Colorado Center for Transplantation Care Research and EducationAurora Colorado USA.
Department of Surgery University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAurora Colorado USA.

Benjamin Samstein (B)

Department of Surgery Weill Cornell Medicine New York New YorkUSA.

AnnMarie Liapakis (A)

Yale University Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Yale New Haven Transplantation CenterNew Haven Connecticut USA.

Anjana A Pillai (AA)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Chicago MedicineChicago Illinois USA.

Robert S Brown (RS)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Weill Cornell Medicine New York New YorkUSA.

Elizabeth A Pomfret (EA)

Colorado Center for Transplantation Care Research and EducationAurora Colorado USA.
Department of Surgery University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAurora Colorado USA.

Classifications MeSH