Sub-cell scale features govern the placement of new cells by honeybees during comb construction.


Journal

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology
ISSN: 1432-1351
Titre abrégé: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101141792

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2023
Historique:
received: 19 12 2022
accepted: 12 04 2023
revised: 21 03 2023
medline: 31 8 2023
pubmed: 10 5 2023
entrez: 10 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Honeybee comb architecture and the manner of its construction have long been the subject of scientific curiosity. Comb is characterised by an even hexagonal layout and the sharing of cell bases and side walls, which provides maximised storage volume while requiring minimal wax. The efficiency of this structure relies on a regular layout and the correct positioning of cells relative to each other, with each new cell placed at the junction of two previously constructed cells. This task is complicated by the incomplete nature of cells at the edge of comb, where new cells are to be built. We presented bees with wax stimuli comprising shallow depressions and protuberances in simulation of features found within partially formed comb, and demonstrated that construction work by honeybee builders was influenced by these stimuli. The building of new cells was aligned to concave stimuli that simulated the clefts that naturally appear between two partially formed cells, revealing how new cells may be aligned to ensure proper tessellation within comb. We also found that bees built cell walls in response to edges formed by our stimuli, suggesting that cell and wall construction was specifically directed towards the locations necessary for continuation of hexagonal comb.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37160812
doi: 10.1007/s00359-023-01632-y
pii: 10.1007/s00359-023-01632-y
pmc: PMC10465656
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

793-805

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

J Insect Sci. 2021 Jul 1;21(4):
pubmed: 34214154
Artif Life. 1999 Spring;5(2):97-116
pubmed: 10633572
Naturwissenschaften. 2004 Jul;91(7):350-3
pubmed: 15257392
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 3;118(31):
pubmed: 34312229
Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 3;9(1):3564
pubmed: 30177694
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 05;9:900
pubmed: 29951014
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2020 Jan;150:1-12
pubmed: 30776381
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 24;13(10):e0205353
pubmed: 30356288
J Psychol Norm Pathol (Paris). 1960 Jan-Mar;57:1-10
pubmed: 13829008
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 20;6:28341
pubmed: 27320492

Auteurs

Vincent Gallo (V)

Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK. v.a.gallo@qmul.ac.uk.

Alice D Bridges (AD)

Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.

Joseph L Woodgate (JL)

Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.

Lars Chittka (L)

Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH