HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 05 2023
09 05 2023
Historique:
received:
08
04
2022
accepted:
20
04
2023
medline:
11
5
2023
pubmed:
10
5
2023
entrez:
10
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Point of care rapid diagnostic tests (POC-RDT) for Hepatitis C virus (HCV), Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Hepatitis B virus (HBV), are ideal for screening in non-clinical outreach settings as they can provide immediate results and facilitate diagnosis, allowing high risk population screening. The aim of this study was to compare POC-RDT with laboratory conventional tests. A total of 301 vulnerable evaluable subjects (drug users, migrants and homeless population) were recruited at a mobile screening unit in outreach settings in Madrid. Fingerprick whole blood capillary samples were tested using the SD BIOLINE HCV POC-RDT, Determine HIV Early Detect and Determine HBsAg 2, and the results were assessed against the LIAISON XL HCV, HIV and Murex-HBsAg-Quant, reference assays, respectively. The feasibility and user satisfaction of the POC-RDT were evaluated through a questionnaire. The resolved sensitivity and resolved specificity and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were as follows, respectively: SD-BIOLINE-HCV: 98.8% (95% CI 93.4, 100.0) and 100.0% (95% CI 98.3, 100.0); Determine HIV Early Detect: 100% (95% CI 85.2, 100.0) and 100% (95% CI 98.7, 100); and Determine HBsAg 2: 66.7% (95% CI 9.4, 99.2) and 100.0% (95% CI 98.7, 100.0). As expected, the number of subjects with a confirmed positive result for HBsAg was very low (n = 4). Therefore, the analytical sensitivity has been evaluated in addition: The Determine HBsAg 2 test demonstrated 100% sensitivity for standard concentrations ≥ 0.125 IU/mL. The subject questionnaire yielded positive feedback for most subjects. The POC-RDT fingerprick blood collection method was well received, and the tests demonstrated a comparable clinical performance with conventional tests in outreach settings and vulnerable high-risk populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37160925
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33925-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-33925-2
pmc: PMC10170094
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hepatitis B Surface Antigens
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7554Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Jul 28;20(1):22146
pubmed: 28782335
J Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 5;220(1):78-90
pubmed: 30726973
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Dec;39(10):656-662
pubmed: 27417563
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jun;29(6):629-633
pubmed: 28230562
J Hepatol. 2021 Feb;74(2):474-475
pubmed: 33229012
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Sep 15;59(6):875-82
pubmed: 24867787
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2020 Feb;38(2):94-95
pubmed: 31248725
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Apr 18;13:181
pubmed: 23597411
HIV Med. 2022 Mar;23(3):237-248
pubmed: 34693615
Malays J Med Sci. 2019 May;26(3):37-48
pubmed: 31303849
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Apr 14;9(6):ofac181
pubmed: 35774932
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):851
pubmed: 33198672
J Med Virol. 2020 Apr 9;:
pubmed: 32270883
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0151946
pubmed: 27031352
PLoS One. 2022 May 31;17(5):e0269250
pubmed: 35639675
Int J STD AIDS. 2009 Feb;20(2):77-83
pubmed: 19182051
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 1;17(Suppl 1):695
pubmed: 29143615