Understanding the perspective of women who use the Billings Ovulation Method®: a focus group study.
Billings ovulation method
Fertility awareness-based method
Fertility control
Natural family planning methods
Natural fertility
Journal
BMC women's health
ISSN: 1472-6874
Titre abrégé: BMC Womens Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088690
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 05 2023
10 05 2023
Historique:
received:
17
03
2023
accepted:
27
04
2023
medline:
11
5
2023
pubmed:
10
5
2023
entrez:
10
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Billings Ovulation Method®(the Billings Method) is a fertility awareness-based method (FABM) of family planning that relies on the observation of patterns of fertility and infertility based on vulvar sensations and appearance of discharges. This allows people to choose when to have intercourse, depending on whether they want to avoid or achieve pregnancy. Few studies have documented user experiences with FABMs. We conducted four virtual focus groups (FGs) in May and June 2021 with current adult women users of the Billings Method. We asked questions about users' reasons for selecting a FABM and the Billings Method, positive experiences and challenges learning and using the Billings Method, and suggestions for improving the user experience. We performed a content analysis of the transcribed FGs to explore key themes from the discussions. COREQ guidelines were followed. Twenty women between the ages of 23 and 43 participated in the FGs. Reasons women described choosing a FABM included to follow religious beliefs, to avoid side effects of hormonal contraception, and/or to learn more about their bodies. Reasons for selecting the Billings Method included perceiving it as more precise and easier to understand than other FABMs, having a scientific basis, and being recommended by family and friends. Experiences related to learning and using the Billings Method were mainly positive. They included finding the method easy to use and learn, successfully using it to either postpone or achieve a pregnancy and increasing their awareness of their bodies. Challenges for participants included the inherent learning curve for identifying sensations at the vulva and the required periods of abstinence. Participants provided suggestions and recommendations for improving users' experience, including raising awareness of the Billings Method among healthcare providers. Users of the Billings Method expressed an overall positive experience when learning and using it for family planning and body awareness. Some challenges were identified that offer opportunities to improve how the Billings Method is taught and delivered. These findings can also enhance healthcare providers' interactions with FABM users, including those of the Billings Method.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The Billings Ovulation Method®(the Billings Method) is a fertility awareness-based method (FABM) of family planning that relies on the observation of patterns of fertility and infertility based on vulvar sensations and appearance of discharges. This allows people to choose when to have intercourse, depending on whether they want to avoid or achieve pregnancy. Few studies have documented user experiences with FABMs.
METHODS
We conducted four virtual focus groups (FGs) in May and June 2021 with current adult women users of the Billings Method. We asked questions about users' reasons for selecting a FABM and the Billings Method, positive experiences and challenges learning and using the Billings Method, and suggestions for improving the user experience. We performed a content analysis of the transcribed FGs to explore key themes from the discussions. COREQ guidelines were followed.
RESULTS
Twenty women between the ages of 23 and 43 participated in the FGs. Reasons women described choosing a FABM included to follow religious beliefs, to avoid side effects of hormonal contraception, and/or to learn more about their bodies. Reasons for selecting the Billings Method included perceiving it as more precise and easier to understand than other FABMs, having a scientific basis, and being recommended by family and friends. Experiences related to learning and using the Billings Method were mainly positive. They included finding the method easy to use and learn, successfully using it to either postpone or achieve a pregnancy and increasing their awareness of their bodies. Challenges for participants included the inherent learning curve for identifying sensations at the vulva and the required periods of abstinence. Participants provided suggestions and recommendations for improving users' experience, including raising awareness of the Billings Method among healthcare providers.
CONCLUSIONS
Users of the Billings Method expressed an overall positive experience when learning and using it for family planning and body awareness. Some challenges were identified that offer opportunities to improve how the Billings Method is taught and delivered. These findings can also enhance healthcare providers' interactions with FABM users, including those of the Billings Method.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37161466
doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02398-w
pii: 10.1186/s12905-023-02398-w
pmc: PMC10170796
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
251Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Contraception. 1979 Jun;19(6):613-29
pubmed: 487811
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2020 Oct-Dec;13(4):261-271
pubmed: 33627974
Contraception. 2022 Oct;114:32-40
pubmed: 35716805
Lancet. 1972 Dec 2;2(7788):1193-4
pubmed: 4117608
BMJ. 2019 Jul 11;366:l4245
pubmed: 31296535
Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Mar-Apr;17(2):141-58
pubmed: 20923873
Front Public Health. 2017 Mar 13;5:42
pubmed: 28349048
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2021 Dec;24(5):353-359
pubmed: 31661330
Fertil Steril. 1981 Nov;36(5):591-8
pubmed: 7308503
Adv Contracept. 1997 Jun-Sep;13(2-3):191-8
pubmed: 9288337
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2020 Sep 15;1(1):354-365
pubmed: 33786500
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008 Feb;30(2):129-137
pubmed: 18254994
Lancet. 1972 Oct 14;2(7781):813-6
pubmed: 4116246
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 May;29(3):612-630
pubmed: 33440034
Contraception. 1988 Nov;38(5):499-508
pubmed: 3197417
Lancet. 1972 Feb 5;1(7745):282-4
pubmed: 4109930
Adv Contracept. 1991 Jun-Sep;7(2-3):301-11
pubmed: 1950726
Rev Bras Enferm. 2013 Jul-Aug;66(4):485-92
pubmed: 24008700
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40
pubmed: 10940958
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):591-604
pubmed: 30095777
Contraception. 2021 Aug;104(2):183-187
pubmed: 33762172
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 24;9:858977
pubmed: 35685421
Contraception. 2018 Jan;97(1):14-21
pubmed: 29038071
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Fertil Steril. 1981 Aug;36(2):152-8
pubmed: 7021189
J Electron Microsc (Tokyo). 2009 Jan;58(1):21-7
pubmed: 19141465
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;57(4):659-73
pubmed: 25264697
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2018 Oct;19(4):371-390
pubmed: 27535921
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2003;35(2):171-6
pubmed: 12854299
Acad Med. 2013 Apr;88(4):552
pubmed: 23531762