Loophole-free Bell inequality violation with superconducting circuits.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
received:
22
08
2022
accepted:
24
02
2023
medline:
12
5
2023
pubmed:
11
5
2023
entrez:
10
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Superposition, entanglement and non-locality constitute fundamental features of quantum physics. The fact that quantum physics does not follow the principle of local causality
Identifiants
pubmed: 37165240
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05885-0
pii: 10.1038/s41586-023-05885-0
pmc: PMC10172133
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
265-270Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 48, 696 (1935).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.48.696
Bell, J. S. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195 (1964).
doi: 10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195
Bell, J. S. in Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy 2nd edn, Ch. 24, 232–248 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004).
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. & Holt, R. A. Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880
Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V. & Wehner, S. Bell nonlocality. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419 (2014).
doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.86.419
Hensen, B. et al. Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature 526, 682–686 (2015).
pubmed: 26503041
doi: 10.1038/nature15759
Giustina, M. et al. Significant-loophole-free test of Bell’s theorem with entangled photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250401 (2015).
pubmed: 26722905
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250401
Shalm, L. K. et al. Strong loophole-free test of local realism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250402 (2015).
pubmed: 26722906
pmcid: 5815856
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250402
Li, M.-H. et al. Test of local realism into the past without detection and locality loopholes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 080404 (2018).
pubmed: 30192594
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.080404
Rosenfeld, W. et al. Event-ready Bell test using entangled atoms simultaneously closing detection and locality loopholes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 010402 (2017).
pubmed: 28731745
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.010402
Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019).
pubmed: 31645734
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5
Kurpiers, P. et al. Deterministic quantum state transfer and remote entanglement using microwave photons. Nature 558, 264–267 (2018).
pubmed: 29899478
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0195-y
Walter, T. et al. Rapid, high-fidelity, single-shot dispersive readout of superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 054020 (2017).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.7.054020
Magnard, P. et al. Microwave quantum link between superconducting circuits housed in spatially separated cryogenic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 260502 (2020).
pubmed: 33449744
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.260502
Scarani, V. Bell Nonlocality (Oxford Univ. Press, 2019).
Freedman, S. J. & Clauser, J. F. Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.28.938
Aspect, A., Grangier, P. & Roger, G. Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm gedankenexperiment: a new violation of Bell’s inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91
Larsson, J.-A. Loopholes in Bell inequality tests of local realism. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 424003 (2014).
doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424003
Aspect, A., Dalibard, J. & Roger, G. Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time- varying analyzers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1804
Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039 (1998).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5039
Rowe, M. A. et al. Experimental violation of a Bell’s inequality with efficient detection. Nature 409, 791–794 (2001).
pubmed: 11236986
doi: 10.1038/35057215
Aspect, A. Closing the door on Einstein and Bohr’s quantum debate. Physics 8, 123 (2015).
doi: 10.1103/Physics.8.123
Acín, A. et al. Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 230501 (2007).
pubmed: 17677888
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.230501
Šupić, I. & Bowles, J. Self-testing of quantum systems: a review. Quantum 4, 337 (2020).
doi: 10.22331/q-2020-09-30-337
Sekatski, P., Bancal, J.-D., Wagner, S. & Sangouard, N. Certifying the building blocks of quantum computers from Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 180505 (2018).
pubmed: 30444388
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.180505
Vazirani, U. & Vidick, T. Fully device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140501 (2014).
pubmed: 25325625
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.140501
Colbeck, R. Quantum and Relativistic Protocols for Secure Multi-Party Computation. PhD thesis, Univ. Cambridge (2009).
Pironio, S. et al. Random numbers certified by Bell’s theorem. Nature 464, 1021–1024 (2010).
pubmed: 20393558
doi: 10.1038/nature09008
Colbeck, R. & Renner, R. Free randomness can be amplified. Nat. Phys. 8, 450–453 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nphys2300
Kessler, M. & Arnon-Friedman, R. Device-independent randomness amplification and privatization. IEEE J. Selected Areas Inf. Theory 1, 568–584 (2020).
doi: 10.1109/JSAIT.2020.3012498
Krinner, S. et al. Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code. Nature 605, 669–674 (2022).
pubmed: 35614249
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04566-8
Leggett, A. J. Macroscopic quantum systems and the quantum theory of measurement. Progr. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 69, 80–100 (1980).
doi: 10.1143/PTPS.69.80
Clarke, J. & Wilhelm, F. K. Superconducting quantum bits. Nature 453, 1031–1042 (2008).
pubmed: 18563154
doi: 10.1038/nature07128
Martinis, J. M., Devoret, M. H. & Clarke, J. Energy-level quantization in the zero-voltage state of a current-biased Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1543 (1985).
pubmed: 10031852
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.1543
Ansmann, M. et al. Violation of Bell’s inequality in Josephson phase qubits. Nature 461, 504–506 (2009).
pubmed: 19779447
doi: 10.1038/nature08363
The BIG Bell Test Collaboration. Challenging local realism with human choices. Nature 557, 212–216 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0085-3
Zhong, Y. P. et al. Violating Bell’s inequality with remotely connected superconducting qubits. Nat. Phys. 15, 741–744 (2019).
Wootters, W. K. Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2245
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P. & Horodecki, M. Violating Bell inequality by mixed spin-12 states: necessary and sufficient condition. Phys. Lett. A 200, 340 (1995).
doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(95)00214-N
Garg, A. & Mermin, N. D. Detector inefficiencies in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment. Phys. Rev. D 35, 3831 (1987).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.35.3831
Eberhard, P. H. Background level and counter efficiencies required for a loophole-free Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment. Phys. Rev. A 47, R747 (1993).
pubmed: 9909100
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.R747
Magnard, P. Meter-Scale Microwave Quantum Networks for Superconducting Circuits. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich (2021).
Axline, C. et al. On-demand quantum state transfer and entanglement between remote microwave cavity memories. Nat. Phys. 14, 705–710 (2018).
Campagne-Ibarcq, P. et al. Deterministic remote entanglement of superconducting circuits through microwave two-photon transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 200501 (2018).
pubmed: 29864347
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.200501
Kurpiers, P., Walter, T., Magnard, P., Salathe, Y. & Wallraff, A. Characterizing the attenuation of coaxial and rectangular microwave-frequency waveguides at cryogenic temperatures. EPJ Quant. Technol. 4, 8 (2017).
doi: 10.1140/epjqt/s40507-017-0059-7
D’Addabbo, A. et al. The CUORE cryostat. J. Low Temp. Phys. 193, 867–875 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s10909-018-2054-5
Pechal, M. et al. Microwave-controlled generation of shaped single photons in circuit quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. X 4, 041010 (2014).
Abellán, C., Amaya, W., Mitrani, D., Pruneri, V. & Mitchell, M. W. Generation of fresh and pure random numbers for loophole-free Bell tests. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250403 (2015).
pubmed: 26722907
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250403
Burkhart, L. D. et al. Error-detected state transfer and entanglement in a superconducting quantum network. PRX Quantum 2, 030321 (2021).
doi: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.030321
Barrett, J., Hardy, L. & Kent, A. No signalling and quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010503 (2005).
pubmed: 16090597
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.010503
Peñas, G. F., Puebla, R., Ramos, T., Rabl, P. & García-Ripoll, J. J. Universal deterministic quantum operations in microwave quantum links. Phys. Rev. Applied 17, 054038 (2022).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.054038
Kjaergaard, M. et al. Superconducting qubits: current state of play. Ann. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 369–395 (2020).
Josephson, B. D. Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling. Phys. Lett. 1, 251–253 (1962).
doi: 10.1016/0031-9163(62)91369-0
Koch, J. et al. Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box. Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042319
DiCarlo, L. et al. Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor. Nature 460, 240–244 (2009).
pubmed: 19561592
doi: 10.1038/nature08121
Blais, A., Grimsmo, A. L., Girvin, S. M. & Wallraff, A. Circuit quantum electrodynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021).
doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025005
Cirac, J. I., Zoller, P., Kimble, H. J. & Mabuchi, H. Quantum state transfer and entanglement distribution among distant nodes in a quantum network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3221 (1997).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3221
Scheidl, T. et al. Violation of local realism with freedom of choice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19708 (2010).
pubmed: 21041665
pmcid: 2993398
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002780107
Zhang, Y., Glancy, S. & Knill, E. Asymptotically optimal data analysis for rejecting local realism. Phys. Rev. A 84, 062118 (2011).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.062118