Evaluating the Impact of a Novel Mobile Care Team on the Prevalence of Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions Presenting to Emergency Medical Services in Nova Scotia.
ambulatory care sensitive conditions
community paramedicine
emergency medical services
prevalence
primary care
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
14
03
2023
accepted:
07
04
2023
medline:
12
5
2023
pubmed:
12
5
2023
entrez:
11
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hospitalization due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) is a proxy measure for access to primary care. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are increasingly called when primary care cannot be accessed. A novel paramedic-nurse EMS Mobile Care Team (MCT) was implemented in an under-serviced community. The MCT responds in a non-transport unit to referrals from EMS, emergency and primary care, and to low-acuity 911 calls in a defined geographic region. Our objective was to compare the prevalence of ACSC in ground ambulance (GA) responses before and after the introduction of the MCT. A cross-sectional analysis of GA and MCT patients with ACSC (determined by chief complaint, clinical impression, treatment protocol, and medical history) from one year pre-MCT implementation to one year post-MCT implementation was conducted for the period of October 1, 2012, to September 30, 2014. Demographics were described. ACSC prevalence was compared using the chi-squared test. There were 975 calls pre-MCT and 1208 GA/95 MCT calls post-MCT. ACSC in GA patients pre- and post-MCT was similar: n=122, 12.5% vs. n=185, 15.3%; p=0.06. ACSC in patients seen by EMS (GA plus MCT) increased in the post-MCT period: 122 (12.5%) vs. 204 (15.7%) p=0.04. Pre-MCT implementation vs post-implementation, GA ACSC calls differed significantly by sex with higher female utilization (n=50 vs. n=105; p=0.007), but not age (65.38, ± 15.12 vs. 62.51 ± 20.48; p=0.16) The prevalence of ACSC did not decrease for GA with the introduction of the MCT, but ACSC in the overall patient population served by EMS increased. It is possible more patients with ACSC call, or are referred to EMS, for the new MCT service. Given that MCT patients were less likely to have a primary care provider, this may represent an increase in access to care or a shift away from other emergency/episodic care. These associations must be further studied to inform the ideal utility of adding such services to EMS and healthcare systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37168216
doi: 10.7759/cureus.37280
pmc: PMC10165853
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e37280Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Brown et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Can J Public Health. 2001 Mar-Apr;92(2):155-9
pubmed: 11338156
Pediatrics. 2010 Jun;125(6):1119-26
pubmed: 20498170
Can J Cardiol. 2014 Dec;30(12):1640-8
pubmed: 25475466
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 May 1;6(3):262-9
pubmed: 23633218
Am J Public Health. 1997 Oct;87(10):1705-9
pubmed: 9357360
Cureus. 2018 Sep 26;10(9):e3369
pubmed: 30510879
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013 Jul-Sep;17(3):361-72
pubmed: 23734989
CJEM. 2013 Jul;15(4):206-13
pubmed: 23777992
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 26;13:336
pubmed: 23972001
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Jul;15(7):607-12
pubmed: 18691211
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9
pubmed: 18313558
Health Aff (Millwood). 1993 Spring;12(1):162-73
pubmed: 8509018
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e016109
pubmed: 29061605
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 27;19(1):259
pubmed: 31029134
Eur J Public Health. 2004 Sep;14(3):246-51
pubmed: 15369028
Emerg Med Int. 2016;2016:6717261
pubmed: 27051533
Cureus. 2023 Apr 8;15(4):e37280
pubmed: 37168216
Med Care. 2011 Jan;49(1):17-23
pubmed: 20978453