Comparison the acute toxicity of two different induction chemotherapy schedules with cisplatin and fluorouracil in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

To compare the acute toxicity of two different induction chemotherapy (IndCT) regimen followed by the same IMRT in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). From July 2015 to December 2016, 110 NPC patients with stage III-IV diseases were prospectively randomized to receive either a conventional triweekly cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (PF) for 3 cycles or weekly P-F for 10 doses, followed by the same IMRT to both arms. The primary endpoints of this study were grade 3/4 and any grade acute toxicities during IndCT period. The secondary endpoints included tumor response and various survivals. Baseline patient characteristics were comparable in both groups. Patients who received weekly P-F experienced significant reduction of grade 3/4 acute toxicities, including neutropenia (12.7% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.0012), anorexia (0% vs. 14.6%, P = 0.0059), mucositis (0% vs. 14.6%, P = 0.0059), and hyponatremia (0% vs. 16.4%, P = 0.0027), compared with the triweekly PF group, resulting in fewer IndCT interruptions (1.8% vs. 16.4%, P = 0.0203), emergency room visits (0% vs. 12.7%, P = 0.0128), and additional hospitalizations (0% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.0568). The acute toxicities during IMRT period were similar. Weekly P-F arm had higher complete response rates (83.6% vs. 61.8%, P = 0.0152) and lower relapse rates (16.4% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.0402) after a median follow-up of 67 months. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses revealed a better trend of locoregional failure-free (P = 0.0892), distant metastasis failure-free (P = 0.0775), and progression-free (P = 0.0709) survivals, favoring the weekly P-F arm. IndCT of weekly schedule does reduce acute toxicities without compromised tumor response and survivals.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.