Influence of isofocal intraocular lenses on objective refraction based on autorefraction and aberrometry.
Aberrometry
Autorefraction
Intraocular lens
Isofocal
Objective refraction
Subjective refraction
Journal
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
ISSN: 1435-702X
Titre abrégé: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8205248
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
02
11
2022
accepted:
08
05
2023
revised:
27
04
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
12
5
2023
entrez:
12
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate and compare the objective refractions obtained by autorefraction and aberrometry under different lighting conditions with an isofocal intraocular lens (Isopure, BVI medical, Liége, Belgium) compared to a monofocal control lens (Micropure, BVI medical, Liége, Belgium) with the same platform and material. Prospective, comparative and randomized study on patients undergoing cataract surgery and bilateral isofocal or monofocal IOL implantation. A total of 44 subjects were randomly assigned to either the isofocal group (n = 22) or the Micropure (n = 22). Manifest refraction (MR) was always performed under the same lighting conditions for all the patients. For objective refraction the autorefractor KR8800 and the aberrometer OPD-Scan III (Nidek Inc., Tokyo, Japan.) were used. For each eye included in the study, six result sets were collected: MR, AR (autorefraction measured with the autorefractor), WF-P and WF-M (Zernike-coefficients-based objective refraction, photopic and mesopic pupil size), OPD-C and OPD-M (autorefraction measured with the aberrometer in photopic and mesopic conditions). The mean sphere for MR was 0.03 ± 0.32D for the Isopure group and 0.24 ± 0.22D for the monofocal group (p = 0.013). For the Isopure group, Friedman analysis showed statistically significant differences for sphere measured with WF-P (p = 0.035), WF-M (p = 0.018) and OPD-M (p = 0.000), and SE measured with OPD-M (p = 0.004). In the Micropure lens group, the Friedman analysis showed differences for all values studied (p < 0.05). Correlation coefficients showed that AR is the objective method with the strongest correlation values for all components of refraction for both groups. The modification of the surfaces of the isofocal lens does not have a negative impact on the refraction obtained by AR compared to a standard monofocal intraocular lens.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37171601
doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06102-4
pii: 10.1007/s00417-023-06102-4
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2863-2872Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Bamdad S, Momeni-Moghaddam H, Abdolahian M, Pinero DP (2022) Agreement of wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction with subjective refraction. J Optom 15:100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2020.08.008
doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.08.008
pubmed: 32896507
Rementeria-Capelo LA, Garcia-Perez JL, Contreras I, Blazquez V, Ruiz-Alcocer J (2021) Automated refraction after trifocal and trifocal toric intraocular lens implantation. Eur J Ophthalmol 31:1031–1038. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120914848
doi: 10.1177/1120672120914848
pubmed: 32264702
Raj PS, Akingbehin T, Levy AM (1990) Objective autorefraction in posterior chamber pseudophakia. Br J Ophthalmol 74:731–733. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.74.12.731
doi: 10.1136/bjo.74.12.731
pubmed: 2275935
pmcid: 1042277
Albarran-Diego C, Munoz G, Rohrweck S, Garcia-Lazaro S, Albero JR (2017) Validity of automated refraction after segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Int J Ophthalmol. 10:1728–33. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2017.11.15
doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.11.15
pubmed: 29181318
pmcid: 5686373
van der Linden JW, Vrijman V, Al-Saady R, van der Meulen IJ, Mourits MP, Lapid-Gortzak R (2014) Autorefraction versus subjective refraction in a radially asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens. Acta Ophthalmol 92:764–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12410
doi: 10.1111/aos.12410
pubmed: 24767468
Garzon N, Garcia-Montero M, Lopez-Artero E, Poyales F, Albarran-Diego C (2019) Influence of trifocal intraocular lenses on standard autorefraction and aberrometer-based autorefraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 45:1265–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.04.017
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.04.017
pubmed: 31326229
Garzon N, Poyales F, Garcia-Montero M, Vega F, Millan MS, Albarran-Diego C (2022) Impact of lens material on objective refraction in eyes with trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses. Curr Eye Res 47:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2021.1946563
doi: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1946563
pubmed: 34161750
Liu J, Dong Y, Wang Y (2019) Efficacy and safety of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 19:198. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1204-0
doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1204-0
pubmed: 31477053
pmcid: 6719364
Fernandez D, Barbero S, Dorronsoro C, Marcos S (2013) Multifocal intraocular lens providing optimized through-focus performance. Opt Lett 38:5303–5306. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.005303
doi: 10.1364/OL.38.005303
pubmed: 24322243
Bilbao-Calabuig R, Llovet-Osuna F, Tejerina V, Gonzalez-Lopez F, Ortega-Usobiaga J, Beltrán J, Pagnoulle C (2019) Isopure IOL: optical principles, optical bench results and first clinical outcomes of a new EDOF intraocular lens. ESCRS Congress. Free Paper Session, Paris
Kang KH, Song MY, Kim KY, Hwang KY, Kwon YA, Koh K (2021) Visual performance and optical quality after implantation of a new generation monofocal intraocular lens. Korean J Ophthalmol 35:112–119. https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2020.1115
doi: 10.3341/kjo.2020.1115
pubmed: 33845556
pmcid: 8046615
Stodulka P, Slovak M (2021) Visual performance of a polynomial extended depth of focus intraocular lens. Open J Ophthalmol 11:214–228. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojoph.2021.113017
doi: 10.4236/ojoph.2021.113017
Garzón N, Poyales F, Albarrán-Diego C, Rico-Del-Viejo L, Pérez-Sanz L, García-Montero M (2022) Visual and optical quality of enhanced intermediate monofocal versus standard monofocal intraocular lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05700-y
doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05700-y
pubmed: 35622140
pmcid: 9581853
Munoz G, Albarran-Diego C, Sakla HF (2007) Validity of autorefraction after cataract surgery with multifocal ReZoom intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1573–1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.024
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.024
pubmed: 17720072
Ota Y, Minami K, Oki S, Bissen-Miyajima H, Okamoto K, Nakashima M, Tsubota K (2021) Subjective and objective refractions in eyes with extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using echelette optics: clinical and experimental study. Acta Ophthalmol 99:e837–e843. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14660
doi: 10.1111/aos.14660
pubmed: 33191658
Labuz G, Son HS, Naujokaitis T, Yildirim TM, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU (2021) Laboratory investigation of preclinical visual-quality metrics and halo-size in enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmol Therapy 10:1093–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-021-00411-9
doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00411-9
Hou M, Ding YJ, Liu LP, Xu YX, Li JB, Wu MX (2020) Accuracy evaluation of objective refraction using the wavefront aberrometer in pseudophakic eyes. Graef Arch Clin Exp 258:2213–2221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04806-5
doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04806-5