Impact of climatic conditions on radial growth of non-native Cedrus libani compared to native conifers in Central Europe.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
10
03
2022
accepted:
14
09
2022
medline:
15
5
2023
pubmed:
12
5
2023
entrez:
12
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ongoing climate change increasingly affects growth conditions of native conifers such as Picea abies (Norway spruce) and Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine) in Central Europe. These conifers are primarily cultivated for wood production. To obtain ecologically and economically stable forests, forestry seeks alternative species that might be less prone to novel climatic conditions, such as Cedrus libani (Lebanon cedar). We aim at investigating growth responses to climatic factors of C. libani compared to native P. abies and P. sylvestris in Central Europe for 25 years (1994-2019). Growth responses were used as a proxy for tolerance towards climatic stress events, such as heat and drought. Height, diameter at breast height (DBH) and radial increment were measured for 40-year-old tree stands of C. libani and native conifers. Radial growth responses to selected climate parameters were analysed using bootstrapped correlations with detrended growth index chronologies and growth response indices for drought years (2003, 2012, 2015, 2018). For C. libani, radial growth was positively correlated with high water availability in late winter and spring, while for P. abies, February and summer and for P. sylvestris, July showed such a relationship. Cedrus libani exhibited the highest resistance, recovery, and resilience in response to climatic extremes. Against the background of climate change, C. libani could serve as an alternative conifer species to establish climate-resistant viable forests in Central Europe.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37172061
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275317
pii: PONE-D-22-07157
pmc: PMC10180601
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0275317Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Zsolnay et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Bot Stud. 2015 Dec;56(1):20
pubmed: 28510829
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2013 May;15(3):483-95
pubmed: 23062025
Tree Physiol. 2007 Feb;27(2):181-98
pubmed: 17241961
Tree Physiol. 2008 May;28(5):689-701
pubmed: 18316301
Tree Physiol. 2010 Jun;30(6):669-88
pubmed: 20368338
Tree Physiol. 2012 Feb;32(2):178-87
pubmed: 22363071
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 23;113(34):9557-62
pubmed: 27503880
J Exp Bot. 2011 May;62(8):2763-71
pubmed: 21273335
Tree Physiol. 2009 Aug;29(8):1011-20
pubmed: 19483185
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Dec;20(12):3767-79
pubmed: 24838398
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Mar;24(3):1150-1163
pubmed: 28991410
Nature. 2007 Jul 12;448(7150):188-90
pubmed: 17625564
Plant Cell Environ. 2011 Sep;34(9):1563-76
pubmed: 21707647
Flora. 2013 Dec 1;208(10-12):
pubmed: 24273375
Tree Physiol. 2005 Feb;25(2):147-56
pubmed: 15574396
Tree Physiol. 2009 Jan;29(1):39-51
pubmed: 19203931
Science. 2004 Aug 13;305(5686):994-7
pubmed: 15310900
Science. 2008 Jun 13;320(5882):1444-9
pubmed: 18556546
Eur J For Res. 2014 May 1;133(3):467-479
pubmed: 24883053
Tree Physiol. 1998 Jun;18(6):393-402
pubmed: 12651364
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Nov;23(11):4788-4797
pubmed: 28417562
Data Brief. 2017 May 06;12:662-666
pubmed: 28560272