Achieved systolic blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in 60-80-year-old patients: the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial.

Cardiovascular disease Hypertension Per-protocol analysis Strategy of blood pressure intervention in elderly hypertensive patients Systolic blood pressure Young-older patient

Journal

European journal of preventive cardiology
ISSN: 2047-4881
Titre abrégé: Eur J Prev Cardiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101564430

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 04 09 2022
revised: 24 04 2023
accepted: 04 05 2023
pubmed: 12 5 2023
medline: 12 5 2023
entrez: 12 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering has been increasingly used; however, data is missing on patients who had target-achieved (TA). This study aims to show the cardiovascular effect of maintaining SBP at intensive levels. The Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial was a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial which enrolled 8511 young-older (60-80 years) hypertensive patients without prior stroke to compare the cardiovascular prognosis of the intensive treatment (SBP target, 110 to <130 mmHg) vs. the standard treatment (130 to <150 mmHg). This secondary analysis assessed data in patients who achieved a mean SBP within target values. The association of mean achieved SBP and cardiovascular events was examined using a cubic spline function. In total, 3053 patients (72.0%) in the intensive-treatment group and 3427 (80.3%) in the standard-treatment group had an SBP target achieved, with mean follow-up SBP values of 124.2 mmHg and 137.4 mmHg, respectively. Throughout the median 3.38-year follow-up, the cardiovascular risk was significantly lower in the TA intensive-treatment group than in the TA standard-treatment group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.80; P < 0.001]. In the intensive-treatment group, patients failing to achieve SBP targets presented higher cardiovascular risk than those TA patients (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.44-2.88; P < 0.001). A J-shaped relationship was observed between the mean achieved SBP and risk of cardiovascular events, with the lowest risk at an SBP of 126.9 mmHg. Maintaining SBP at <130 mmHg offers additional cardiovascular benefits among young-older patients with hypertension. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03015311. This present study is a secondary analysis that investigated the association between mean achieved BP in the two treatment groups (SBP target, 110 to <130 vs. 130 to <150 mmHg) and their cardiovascular outcomes in the STEP study (60–80-year-old patients with hypertension).Patients achieving a target in the intensive-treatment group have better cardiovascular outcome than patients achieving a target in the standard treatment arm, supporting the cardiovascular benefits of maintaining SBP <130 mmHg.J-shaped relationships were observed between mean achieved SBP and cardiovascular outcomes (with the nadir around 130 mmHg), but not for stroke.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
This present study is a secondary analysis that investigated the association between mean achieved BP in the two treatment groups (SBP target, 110 to <130 vs. 130 to <150 mmHg) and their cardiovascular outcomes in the STEP study (60–80-year-old patients with hypertension).Patients achieving a target in the intensive-treatment group have better cardiovascular outcome than patients achieving a target in the standard treatment arm, supporting the cardiovascular benefits of maintaining SBP <130 mmHg.J-shaped relationships were observed between mean achieved SBP and cardiovascular outcomes (with the nadir around 130 mmHg), but not for stroke.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37172116
pii: 7161021
doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad142
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03015311']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1017-1027

Subventions

Organisme : Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program
ID : BJJWZYJH01201910023029
Organisme : Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences
ID : 2021-I2M-1-007
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81630014

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest: Olmesartan medoxomil tablets were donated by Nanjing Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Nanjing, China. Amlodipine besylate tablets were donated by China Resources Saike Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Beijing, China. BP monitors were donated by Omron Healthcare Co. Ltd. The companies that donated the drugs and devices had no role in the design of the study or the analysis of the data. All authors declare no competing interests.

Auteurs

Yue Deng (Y)

Hypertension Center, FuWai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beilishi Road 167, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.

Jingjing Bai (J)

Hypertension Center, FuWai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beilishi Road 167, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.

Xinchun Yang (X)

Department of Cardiology, Beijing ChaoYang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.

Wei Liu (W)

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, 100730, China.

Zihong Guo (Z)

Department of Cardiology, FuWai Yunnan Cardiovascular Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan, 650106, China.

Juyan Zhang (J)

Department of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030001, China.

Rongjie Huang (R)

Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530027, China.

Xiaomin Yang (X)

Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, 014030, China.

Chunli Yu (C)

Department of Cardiology, The Sixth Hospital of Nanchang, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330003, China.

Jing Yu (J)

Department of Cardiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China.

Xiurong Guo (X)

Hypertension Center, FuWai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beilishi Road 167, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.

Hailei Wu (H)

Hypertension Center, FuWai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beilishi Road 167, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.

Peiyu Liu (P)

Hypertension Center, FuWai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beilishi Road 167, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.

Weili Zhang (W)

Hypertension Center, FuWai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beilishi Road 167, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.

Jun Cai (J)

Hypertension Center, FuWai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beilishi Road 167, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.

Classifications MeSH