Achieved systolic blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in 60-80-year-old patients: the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial.
Cardiovascular disease
Hypertension
Per-protocol analysis
Strategy of blood pressure intervention in elderly hypertensive patients
Systolic blood pressure
Young-older patient
Journal
European journal of preventive cardiology
ISSN: 2047-4881
Titre abrégé: Eur J Prev Cardiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101564430
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2023
01 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
04
09
2022
revised:
24
04
2023
accepted:
04
05
2023
pubmed:
12
5
2023
medline:
12
5
2023
entrez:
12
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering has been increasingly used; however, data is missing on patients who had target-achieved (TA). This study aims to show the cardiovascular effect of maintaining SBP at intensive levels. The Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial was a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial which enrolled 8511 young-older (60-80 years) hypertensive patients without prior stroke to compare the cardiovascular prognosis of the intensive treatment (SBP target, 110 to <130 mmHg) vs. the standard treatment (130 to <150 mmHg). This secondary analysis assessed data in patients who achieved a mean SBP within target values. The association of mean achieved SBP and cardiovascular events was examined using a cubic spline function. In total, 3053 patients (72.0%) in the intensive-treatment group and 3427 (80.3%) in the standard-treatment group had an SBP target achieved, with mean follow-up SBP values of 124.2 mmHg and 137.4 mmHg, respectively. Throughout the median 3.38-year follow-up, the cardiovascular risk was significantly lower in the TA intensive-treatment group than in the TA standard-treatment group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.80; P < 0.001]. In the intensive-treatment group, patients failing to achieve SBP targets presented higher cardiovascular risk than those TA patients (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.44-2.88; P < 0.001). A J-shaped relationship was observed between the mean achieved SBP and risk of cardiovascular events, with the lowest risk at an SBP of 126.9 mmHg. Maintaining SBP at <130 mmHg offers additional cardiovascular benefits among young-older patients with hypertension. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03015311. This present study is a secondary analysis that investigated the association between mean achieved BP in the two treatment groups (SBP target, 110 to <130 vs. 130 to <150 mmHg) and their cardiovascular outcomes in the STEP study (60–80-year-old patients with hypertension).Patients achieving a target in the intensive-treatment group have better cardiovascular outcome than patients achieving a target in the standard treatment arm, supporting the cardiovascular benefits of maintaining SBP <130 mmHg.J-shaped relationships were observed between mean achieved SBP and cardiovascular outcomes (with the nadir around 130 mmHg), but not for stroke.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
This present study is a secondary analysis that investigated the association between mean achieved BP in the two treatment groups (SBP target, 110 to <130 vs. 130 to <150 mmHg) and their cardiovascular outcomes in the STEP study (60–80-year-old patients with hypertension).Patients achieving a target in the intensive-treatment group have better cardiovascular outcome than patients achieving a target in the standard treatment arm, supporting the cardiovascular benefits of maintaining SBP <130 mmHg.J-shaped relationships were observed between mean achieved SBP and cardiovascular outcomes (with the nadir around 130 mmHg), but not for stroke.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37172116
pii: 7161021
doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad142
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03015311']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1017-1027Subventions
Organisme : Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program
ID : BJJWZYJH01201910023029
Organisme : Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences
ID : 2021-I2M-1-007
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81630014
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: Olmesartan medoxomil tablets were donated by Nanjing Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Nanjing, China. Amlodipine besylate tablets were donated by China Resources Saike Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Beijing, China. BP monitors were donated by Omron Healthcare Co. Ltd. The companies that donated the drugs and devices had no role in the design of the study or the analysis of the data. All authors declare no competing interests.