Measures of Social and Occupational Function in Early Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

functioning measures measurement psychosocial function schizophrenia social function

Journal

Schizophrenia bulletin
ISSN: 1745-1701
Titre abrégé: Schizophr Bull
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0236760

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 May 2023
Historique:
medline: 13 5 2023
pubmed: 13 5 2023
entrez: 12 5 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Deficits in social and occupational function are widely reported in psychosis, yet no one measure of function is currently agreed upon as a gold standard in psychosis research. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of functioning measures to determine what measures were associated with largest effect sizes when measuring between-group differences, changes over time, or response to treatment. Literature searches were conducted based on PsycINFO and PubMed to identify studies for inclusion. Cross-sectional and longitudinal observational and intervention studies of early psychosis (≤5 years since diagnosis) that included social and occupational functioning as an outcome measure were considered. A series of meta-analyses were conducted to determine effect size differences for between-group differences, changes over time, or response to treatment. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were carried out to account for variability in study and participant characteristics. One hundred and sixteen studies were included, 46 studies provided data (N = 13 261) relevant to our meta-analysis. Smallest effect sizes for changes in function over time and in response to treatment were observed for global measures, while more specific measures of social and occupational function showed the largest effect sizes. Differences in effect sizes between functioning measures remained significant after variability in study and participant characteristics were accounted for. Findings suggest that more specific measures of social function are better able to detect changes in function over time and in response to treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37173277
pii: 7161118
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad062
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Health Research Board
ID : RL-2020-007
Pays : Ireland

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.

Auteurs

Megan Cowman (M)

Centre for Neuroimaging, Cognition & Genomics (NICOG), School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Emmet Godfrey (E)

Centre for Neuroimaging, Cognition & Genomics (NICOG), School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Talissa Walsh (T)

Centre for Neuroimaging, Cognition & Genomics (NICOG), School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Emma Frawley (E)

Centre for Neuroimaging, Cognition & Genomics (NICOG), School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

David Fowler (D)

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.

Mario Alvarez-Jimenez (M)

Orygen, Melbourne, Australia.
Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

Karen O'Connor (K)

RISE Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, South Lee Mental Health Service, Cork, Ireland.
Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioural Science, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Til Wykes (T)

School of Mental Health & Psychological Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Max Birchwood (M)

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Gary Donohoe (G)

Centre for Neuroimaging, Cognition & Genomics (NICOG), School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Classifications MeSH