Pain assessment following open hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia versus saddle block: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Local anesthesia
Open hemorrhoidectomy
Pain
Saddle block
Uganda
Journal
BMC surgery
ISSN: 1471-2482
Titre abrégé: BMC Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968567
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 May 2023
12 May 2023
Historique:
received:
03
09
2022
accepted:
06
05
2023
medline:
15
5
2023
pubmed:
13
5
2023
entrez:
12
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is disparity in evidence on pain assessment post open hemorrhoidectomy (OH) using local anesthesia and its use in developing countries compared to developed countries. Therefore, we conducted this study to assess the occurrence of postoperative pain following open hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia versus saddle block for uncomplicated 3 This was a prospective equivalence randomized, double blind controlled trial conducted from December 2021 to May 2022 among patients with primary uncomplicated 3 We recruited 58 participants in this study who underwent open hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia or saddle block (29 participants per group). The sex ratio was of 1.15 of female to male and a mean age of 39 ± 13. VAS was found to be different at 2 h post OH compare to other time of pain assessment but not statically significant by area under the cover (AUC) (95% CI = 486-0.773: AUC = 0.63; p = 0.09) with a none significance by Kruskal-Wallis's test (p:0.925). Local anesthesia was found to be having a similar pain severity occurrence in post operative period among patients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy for primary uncomplicated 3 Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, PACTR202110667430356. Registered on 8
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is disparity in evidence on pain assessment post open hemorrhoidectomy (OH) using local anesthesia and its use in developing countries compared to developed countries. Therefore, we conducted this study to assess the occurrence of postoperative pain following open hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia versus saddle block for uncomplicated 3
METHODS
METHODS
This was a prospective equivalence randomized, double blind controlled trial conducted from December 2021 to May 2022 among patients with primary uncomplicated 3
RESULTS
RESULTS
We recruited 58 participants in this study who underwent open hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia or saddle block (29 participants per group). The sex ratio was of 1.15 of female to male and a mean age of 39 ± 13. VAS was found to be different at 2 h post OH compare to other time of pain assessment but not statically significant by area under the cover (AUC) (95% CI = 486-0.773: AUC = 0.63; p = 0.09) with a none significance by Kruskal-Wallis's test (p:0.925).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Local anesthesia was found to be having a similar pain severity occurrence in post operative period among patients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy for primary uncomplicated 3
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, PACTR202110667430356. Registered on 8
Identifiants
pubmed: 37173653
doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02030-6
pii: 10.1186/s12893-023-02030-6
pmc: PMC10182622
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
124Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Medicina (Kaunas). 2004;40(2):101-11
pubmed: 15007268
Indian J Surg. 2012 Aug;74(4):330-3
pubmed: 23904726
Anaesthesia. 2018 Mar;73(3):284-294
pubmed: 29417547
J Thorac Dis. 2009 Dec;1(1):51-4
pubmed: 22263004
Anesth Analg. 1999 Mar;88(3):508-17
pubmed: 10071996
Br J Surg. 2008 May;95(5):555-63
pubmed: 18389499
Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):36-41
pubmed: 29628551
Acta Inform Med. 2014 Dec;22(6):365-7
pubmed: 25684841
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;30:73-75
pubmed: 27960130
Int J Surg. 2010;8(1):29-31
pubmed: 19800430
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Mar;11(3):233-43; discussion 243
pubmed: 18637932
ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:650684
pubmed: 26106643
World J Surg. 2020 Sep;44(9):3119-3129
pubmed: 32383052