Exploring communication and implementation challenges of the HIV/AIDS policy change to test-and-treat-all in selected public health facilities in Lusaka District, Zambia.

Communication HIV/AIDS Implementation Policy change Test-and-treat-all Zambia

Journal

Implementation science communications
ISSN: 2662-2211
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764360

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 May 2023
Historique:
received: 09 02 2022
accepted: 18 04 2023
medline: 13 5 2023
pubmed: 13 5 2023
entrez: 12 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The World Health Organization has promoted a shift towards the test-and-treat-all strategy to accelerate the elimination of HIV/AIDS. Zambia was one of the early African countries to adopt this strategy as the policy change was officially announced on national television by the republican president on 15th August 2017. This study explored the communication and implementation challenges of the HIV/AIDS policy change to test-and-treat-all in selected public health facilities in Lusaka District, Zambia. A qualitative case study design was employed with a purposeful sample of policy makers, international partners, National AIDS Council representatives, health facility managers, and frontline health providers in selected tertiary, secondary and primary health facilities in the Lusaka District, Zambia. Thematic data analysis was performed using NVivo 12 Pro software. In total, 22 key informant interviews and 3 focus group discussions were conducted. The government relied on formal and informal channels to communicate the test-and-treat-all policy change to health providers. Whilst HIV policy changes were reflected in the National HIV/AIDS Strategic Framework, there was little awareness of this policy by the frontline providers. The use of informal communication channels such as verbal and text instructions affected health providers' implementation of the test-and-treat-all. Electronic and print media were ineffective in communicating the test-and-treat-all policy change to some sections of the public. Top-down stakeholder engagement, limited health worker training, and poor financing negatively affected the implementation of the test-and-treat-all policy change. Acceptability of the test-and-treat-all policy change was shaped by positive provider perceptions of its benefits, limited sense of policy ownership, and resistance by the non-treatment-ready patients. Furthermore, unintended consequences of the test-and-treat-all policy change on human resources for health and facility infrastructure were reported. Effective test-and-treat-all policy change communication is vital for successful policy implementation as it enhances interpretation and adoption among health providers and patients. There is a need to enhance collaboration among policy makers, implementers and the public to develop and apply communication strategies that facilitate the adoption of the test-and-treat-all policy changes to sustain gains in the fight against HIV/AIDS.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The World Health Organization has promoted a shift towards the test-and-treat-all strategy to accelerate the elimination of HIV/AIDS. Zambia was one of the early African countries to adopt this strategy as the policy change was officially announced on national television by the republican president on 15th August 2017. This study explored the communication and implementation challenges of the HIV/AIDS policy change to test-and-treat-all in selected public health facilities in Lusaka District, Zambia.
METHODS METHODS
A qualitative case study design was employed with a purposeful sample of policy makers, international partners, National AIDS Council representatives, health facility managers, and frontline health providers in selected tertiary, secondary and primary health facilities in the Lusaka District, Zambia. Thematic data analysis was performed using NVivo 12 Pro software.
RESULTS RESULTS
In total, 22 key informant interviews and 3 focus group discussions were conducted. The government relied on formal and informal channels to communicate the test-and-treat-all policy change to health providers. Whilst HIV policy changes were reflected in the National HIV/AIDS Strategic Framework, there was little awareness of this policy by the frontline providers. The use of informal communication channels such as verbal and text instructions affected health providers' implementation of the test-and-treat-all. Electronic and print media were ineffective in communicating the test-and-treat-all policy change to some sections of the public. Top-down stakeholder engagement, limited health worker training, and poor financing negatively affected the implementation of the test-and-treat-all policy change. Acceptability of the test-and-treat-all policy change was shaped by positive provider perceptions of its benefits, limited sense of policy ownership, and resistance by the non-treatment-ready patients. Furthermore, unintended consequences of the test-and-treat-all policy change on human resources for health and facility infrastructure were reported.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Effective test-and-treat-all policy change communication is vital for successful policy implementation as it enhances interpretation and adoption among health providers and patients. There is a need to enhance collaboration among policy makers, implementers and the public to develop and apply communication strategies that facilitate the adoption of the test-and-treat-all policy changes to sustain gains in the fight against HIV/AIDS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37173757
doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00430-6
pii: 10.1186/s43058-023-00430-6
pmc: PMC10176665
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

51

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Health Policy Plan. 2017 Nov 1;32(9):1316-1326
pubmed: 28981667
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2019 May 09;11(1):e1-e11
pubmed: 31170791
JAMA. 2019 Oct 8;322(14):1345-1346
pubmed: 31415085
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015 May-Jun;68(3):226-31
pubmed: 26157184
J Infect Public Health. 2018 Jan - Feb;11(1):80-84
pubmed: 28579268
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 12;9(11):e108304
pubmed: 25389777
AIDS Res Ther. 2016 Jan 19;13:4
pubmed: 26793264
AIDS Behav. 2019 Sep;23(9):2618-2628
pubmed: 31093820
Implement Sci. 2017 Apr 4;12(1):45
pubmed: 28376834
Lancet. 2017 Sep 2;390(10098):925
pubmed: 28847612
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 7;13(2):e0192327
pubmed: 29415004
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2017 Sep - Oct;28(5):770-783
pubmed: 28629800
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Aug 07;69(31):1039-1043
pubmed: 32759917
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Jan;54(1):11-21
pubmed: 11820675
Afr J AIDS Res. 2003;2(1):9-21
pubmed: 25871935
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 May 30;13:27
pubmed: 26022699
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 May 17;19(1):432
pubmed: 31101081
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Aug;17(8):873-881
pubmed: 28483415
Rev Bras Enferm. 2017 Jan-Feb;70(1):180-188
pubmed: 28226058

Auteurs

Constance Simooya (C)

Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Adam Silumbwe (A)

Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. adam.silumbwe@umu.se.
Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden. adam.silumbwe@umu.se.

Hikabasa Halwindi (H)

Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Joseph Mumba Zulu (JM)

Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Selestine Nzala (S)

Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Classifications MeSH