Radiotherapy-Dose Escalated for Large Volume Primary Tumors-And Cetuximab with or without Induction Chemotherapy for HPV Associated Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck-A Randomized Phase II Trial.
distant metastases
head and neck cancer
radiobiology
radiosensitizer
radiotherapy
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Apr 2023
28 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
03
03
2023
revised:
22
04
2023
accepted:
24
04
2023
medline:
13
5
2023
pubmed:
13
5
2023
entrez:
13
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The leading cause of death for patients with HPV associated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) after treatment with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) nowadays is peripheral metastasis. This study investigated whether induction chemotherapy (IC) could improve progression free survival (PFS) and impact on relapse pattern after CRT. Eligible patients in this multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase 2 trial had p16-positive locoregionally advanced SCCHN. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either RT with cetuximab (arm B) versus the same regimen preceded by two cycles of taxotere/cisplatin/5-FU (arm A). The RT dose was escalated to 74.8 Gy for large volume primary tumors. Eligibility criteria included patients of 18-75 years, an ECOG performance status 0-1, and adequate organ functions. From January 2011 to February 2016, 152 patients, all with oropharyngeal tumors were enrolled, 77 in arm A and 75 in arm B. Two patients, one in each group, withdrew their consent after randomization, leaving 150 patients for the ITT analysis. PFS at 2 years was 84.2% (95% CI 76.4-92.8) in arm A and 78.4% (95% CI 69.5-88.3) in arm B (HR 1.39, 95% CI 0.69-2.79, PFS, locoregional control and toxicity did not differ between the two arms, OS was high, and there were few local relapses. In arm B, more than twice as many patients had distant metastasis as the first site of relapse compared to arm A. The response to IC was found to define 29% of patients in arm A who did not have a tumor relapse during follow-up. An escalated dose of 74.8 Gy could mitigate the negative impact of large tumor volume but for some patients, even this intensified treatment was insufficient.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37174008
pii: cancers15092543
doi: 10.3390/cancers15092543
pmc: PMC10177265
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jul;62:138-45
pubmed: 27237360
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Mar 30;31(5):1341-6
pubmed: 7713792
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 1;32(34):3858-66
pubmed: 25366680
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 10;31(5):543-50
pubmed: 23295795
Lancet. 2019 Jan 5;393(10166):40-50
pubmed: 30449625
Head Neck. 2019 Jul;41(7):2271-2276
pubmed: 30719797
Oral Oncol. 2014 Jan;50(1):45-51
pubmed: 24211084
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):24-35
pubmed: 20530316
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 1;26(19):3138-46
pubmed: 18474879
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Mar;156:281-293
pubmed: 33515668
Ann Oncol. 2011 May;22(5):1071-1077
pubmed: 21317223
Oncologist. 2021 Jan;26(1):40-48
pubmed: 32864799
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):1509-1520
pubmed: 27686945
N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 9;354(6):567-78
pubmed: 16467544
Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jun 14;17(1):107
pubmed: 35701827
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 10;35(5):490-497
pubmed: 28029303
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):257-64
pubmed: 23414589
N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 11;359(11):1116-27
pubmed: 18784101
Radiother Oncol. 2013 May;107(2):242-6
pubmed: 23602369
Oncotarget. 2017 May 2;8(18):29963-29975
pubmed: 28415784
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan 1;39(1):38-47
pubmed: 33052757
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 1;32(25):2735-43
pubmed: 25049329
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 19;13(8):
pubmed: 33921668
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Feb 20;100(4):261-9
pubmed: 18270337
Strahlenther Onkol. 2014 Sep;190(9):839-46
pubmed: 24715240
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):803-811
pubmed: 28434660
Lancet. 2019 Jan 5;393(10166):51-60
pubmed: 30449623