Tumor Sink Effect with Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Theranostics in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Intra-Individual Evaluations.
metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)
prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)
radioligand therapy (RLT)
tumor sink effect
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 May 2023
03 May 2023
Historique:
received:
24
03
2023
revised:
25
04
2023
accepted:
28
04
2023
medline:
13
5
2023
pubmed:
13
5
2023
entrez:
13
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
"Tumor sink effects", decreased physiological uptake of radiopharmaceuticals due to sequestration by a tumor, may impact radioligand therapy (RLT) toxicity and dosing. We investigated these effects with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiopharmaceuticals in the healthy organs-at-risk (the parotid glands, kidneys, liver, and spleen) of 33 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We retrospectively performed three intra-individual comparisons. First, we correlated changes from baseline to post-RLT (after two 177-lutetium (177Lu)-PSMA-617 cycles) in total lesional PSMA (∆TLP) and organ mean standardized uptake values (∆SUVmean). Second, in 25 RLT responders, we compared the organ SUVmean post-RLT versus that at baseline. Lastly, we correlated the baseline TLP and organ SUVmean. Data were acquired via 68-gallium-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography before the first and after the second 177Lu-PSMA-617 cycle. In the parotid glands and spleen, ∆TLP and ∆SUVmean showed a significant inverse correlation (r = -0.40,
Identifiants
pubmed: 37174058
pii: cancers15092592
doi: 10.3390/cancers15092592
pmc: PMC10177482
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Aug;44(9):1473-1479
pubmed: 28337529
World J Nucl Med. 2020 Jan 17;19(2):141-143
pubmed: 32939202
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 16;385(12):1091-1103
pubmed: 34161051
J Nucl Med. 2022 Feb;63(2):226-232
pubmed: 34049987
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Sep;47(10):2322-2327
pubmed: 32140802
Ann Nucl Med. 2018 Oct;32(8):512-522
pubmed: 30109562
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Nov;46(12):2536-2544
pubmed: 31440799
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Oct;44(11):1806-1812
pubmed: 28624849
EJNMMI Phys. 2021 May 5;8(1):40
pubmed: 33950333
Ann Nucl Med. 2021 May;35(5):529-539
pubmed: 33586096
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Apr;49(5):1584-1594
pubmed: 34725725
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Feb;49(3):1075-1085
pubmed: 34494131
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 21;13(12):
pubmed: 34205686
Prostate. 2014 Feb;74(2):210-6
pubmed: 24132735
J Nucl Med. 2018 Jun;59(6):929-933
pubmed: 29419479
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Jul 1;27(13):3595-3601
pubmed: 33883176
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 6;8(33):55094-55103
pubmed: 28903405
Mol Imaging Biol. 2020 Feb;22(1):190-197
pubmed: 31140110
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Jan;39(1):50-6
pubmed: 21932117
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Mar;47(3):687-694
pubmed: 31901103
Mol Imaging Biol. 2020 Feb;22(1):15-17
pubmed: 31624994
J Nucl Med. 2019 Apr;60(4):517-523
pubmed: 30291192
J Nucl Med. 2009 May;50 Suppl 1:122S-50S
pubmed: 19403881
Nuklearmedizin. 2018 Feb;57(1):19-25
pubmed: 29536496
Lancet. 2021 Feb 27;397(10276):797-804
pubmed: 33581798
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Jan;49(2):460-469
pubmed: 34218300
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jun;44(6):1014-1024
pubmed: 28283702
Mol Imaging Biol. 2020 Feb;22(1):181-189
pubmed: 31115751
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Feb;41(2):211-3
pubmed: 24221244
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Jan;48(1):103-112
pubmed: 32378019
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jun;19(6):825-833
pubmed: 29752180
Nucl Med Commun. 2022 Apr 1;43(4):369-377
pubmed: 35045551