Wealth Status and Health Insurance Enrollment in India: An Empirical Analysis.

India health inequity health insurance health policy health research population health public policy wealth

Journal

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2227-9032
Titre abrégé: Healthcare (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666525

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 May 2023
Historique:
received: 26 02 2023
revised: 21 04 2023
accepted: 27 04 2023
medline: 13 5 2023
pubmed: 13 5 2023
entrez: 13 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Since 2005, health insurance (HI) coverage in India has significantly increased, largely because of the introduction of government-funded pro-poor insurance programs. As a result, the determinants of HI enrollment and their relative importance may have changed. Using National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-4 data, collected in 2015-2016, and employing a Probit regression model, we re-examine the determinants of household HI enrollment. Then, using a multinomial logistic regression model, we estimate the relative risk ratio for enrollment in different HI schemes. In comparison to the results on the determinants of HI enrollment using the NFHS data collected in 2005-2006, we find a decrease in the wealth gap in public HI enrollment. Nonetheless, disparities in enrollment remain, with some changes in those patterns. Households with low assets have lower enrollments in private and community-based health insurance (CBHI) programs. Households with a higher number of dependents have a higher likelihood of HI enrollment, especially in rural areas. In rural areas, poor Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe households are more likely to be enrolled in public HI than the general Caste households. In urban areas, Muslim households have a lower likelihood of enrollment in any HI. The educational attainment of household heads is positively associated with enrollment in private HI, but it is negatively associated with enrollment in public HI. Since 2005-2006, while HI coverage has improved, disparities across social groups remain.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37174885
pii: healthcare11091343
doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091343
pmc: PMC10177841
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

PLoS One. 2019 Aug 20;14(8):e0211086
pubmed: 31430275
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Jul;31(6):749-58
pubmed: 26838795
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 21;8(6):e66296
pubmed: 23805211
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jan;76(1):67-73
pubmed: 23157931
Anthropol Med. 2016;23(1):102-24
pubmed: 26828125
Soc Sci Med. 2017 May;181:83-92
pubmed: 28376358
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2210040
pubmed: 35560051
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 May 09;4(3):e001445
pubmed: 31179039
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 25;18(1):50
pubmed: 32450870
PLoS One. 2022 May 12;17(5):e0266798
pubmed: 35552557
J Health Econ. 2000 Nov;19(6):855-76
pubmed: 11186849
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):949
pubmed: 32546221
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 27;19(1):1004
pubmed: 31882004
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 26;19(1):1735
pubmed: 31878911

Auteurs

Preshit Nemdas Ambade (PN)

Department of Population Health Sciences, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.

Joe Gerald (J)

Department of Community, Environment & Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.

Tauhidur Rahman (T)

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.

Classifications MeSH