Determination and Calculations of Mercury Vapor Concentration and Energy Released from Freshly Condensed Dental Amalgams Having Various Copper Percentages within the Alloy.
corrosion resistance
creep
ductility
grain boundary structure
hardness
mercury emission
mercury vapor concentration
phase formation
properties
γ1-phase
γ2-phase
Journal
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Apr 2023
28 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
03
03
2023
revised:
21
04
2023
accepted:
25
04
2023
medline:
13
5
2023
pubmed:
13
5
2023
entrez:
13
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dental amalgam is an alloy consisting of a mixture of fine metallic powder of silver, tin, zinc, copper, and a trace amount of palladium in combination with about fifty percent elemental mercury that forms a matrix phase. Dental amalgams consisting of a high-copper content are the most common types of alloys currently utilized for the restoration of decayed, broken, and fractured posterior human teeth. The present research objective was primarily to improve the material properties by determining and analyzing the amount of mercury vapor released from dental amalgam received from eight different commercial brands. The mechanical hardness of the alloys was found to increase with an increase in copper content in the amalgam. The effect of copper addition on material aging was also studied. During the release of mercury vapor, the corresponding energies associated with the release of mercury vapor from each sample were determined for each successive measurement. The results indicated that increasing the copper content of the amalgam counters the release of mercury vapor from posterior teeth and improves the hardness properties.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37176331
pii: ma16093452
doi: 10.3390/ma16093452
pmc: PMC10180447
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : DMR-2122067
Références
Dent Mater. 1987 Aug;3(4):176-81
pubmed: 3481592
J Dent Res. 1989 Aug;68(8):1231-3
pubmed: 2632609
Rev Environ Health. 2014;29(1-2):29-31
pubmed: 24552960
Oper Dent. 1986 Winter;11(1):8-13
pubmed: 3459136
Dent Mater. 2003 May;19(3):232-9
pubmed: 12628436
J Dent Res. 1965 Sep-Oct;44(5):1002-12
pubmed: 5213003
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Summer;39(4):303-10
pubmed: 26161599
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013 Feb;34(2):138-40, 142, 144 passim
pubmed: 23556322
Sci Total Environ. 2000 Oct 2;259(1-3):13-21
pubmed: 11032131
Biomaterials. 2004 Jul;25(16):3147-53
pubmed: 14980409
J Dent Res. 1985 Aug;64(8):1069-71
pubmed: 3860538
Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1996;7(1):12-22
pubmed: 8727104
J Dent Res. 1978 Jul-Aug;57(7-8):759-67
pubmed: 281347
Eur J Oral Sci. 2012 Dec;120(6):539-48
pubmed: 23167471
Environ Res. 2018 Jul;164:65-69
pubmed: 29482185
Dent Mater J. 1997 Dec;16(2):191-9
pubmed: 9555257
J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:460508
pubmed: 22235210
J Dent Res. 1992 May;71(5):1151-5
pubmed: 1607431
J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Apr;25(4):279-84
pubmed: 9610855
J Am Dent Assoc. 1959 Apr;58(4):78-83
pubmed: 13640864
J Dent Res. 1962 Jul-Aug;41:890-906
pubmed: 13885292
Photomed Laser Surg. 2010 Oct;28 Suppl 2:S111-4
pubmed: 20929387
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2006 Jan-Feb;28(1):39-48
pubmed: 16343843
Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1996;7(1):23-35
pubmed: 8727105
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6126385
pubmed: 27446955
J Dent Res. 1968 May-Jun;47(3):418-26
pubmed: 5240791
CDA J. 1984 Oct;12(10):54-60
pubmed: 6593134