Extended Preoperative Audiometry for Outcome Prediction and Risk Analysis in Patients Receiving Cochlear Implants.

auditory rehabilitation cochlear implant hearing loss prediction model preoperative audiometric diagnostics speech comprehension speech perception

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 May 2023
Historique:
received: 15 02 2023
revised: 21 04 2023
accepted: 27 04 2023
medline: 13 5 2023
pubmed: 13 5 2023
entrez: 13 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The outcome of cochlear implantation has improved over the last decades, but there are still patients with less benefit. Despite numerous studies examining the cochlear implant (CI) outcome, variations in speech comprehension with CI remains incompletely explained. The aim of this study was therefore to examine preoperative pure-tone audiogram and speech comprehension as well as aetiology, to investigate their relationship with postoperative speech comprehension in CI recipients. A retrospective study with 664 ears of 530 adult patients was conducted. Correlations between the target variable postoperative word comprehension with the preoperative speech and sound comprehension as well as aetiology were investigated. Significant correlations were inserted into multivariate models. Speech comprehension measured as word recognition score at 70 dB with CI was analyzed as (i) a continuous and (ii) a dichotomous variable. All variables that tested preoperative hearing were significantly correlated with the dichotomous target; with the continuous target, all except word comprehension at 65 dB with hearing aid. The strongest correlation with postoperative speech comprehension was seen for monosyllabic words with hearing aid at 80 dB. The preoperative maximum word comprehension was reached or surpassed by 97.3% of CI patients. Meningitis and congenital diseases were strongly negatively associated with postoperative word comprehension. The multivariate model was able to explain 40% of postoperative variability. Speech comprehension with hearing aid at 80 dB can be used as a supplementary preoperative indicator of CI-aided speech comprehension and should be measured regularly in the clinical routine. Combining audiological and aetiological variables provides more insights into the variability of the CI outcome, allowing for better patient counselling.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The outcome of cochlear implantation has improved over the last decades, but there are still patients with less benefit. Despite numerous studies examining the cochlear implant (CI) outcome, variations in speech comprehension with CI remains incompletely explained. The aim of this study was therefore to examine preoperative pure-tone audiogram and speech comprehension as well as aetiology, to investigate their relationship with postoperative speech comprehension in CI recipients.
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective study with 664 ears of 530 adult patients was conducted. Correlations between the target variable postoperative word comprehension with the preoperative speech and sound comprehension as well as aetiology were investigated. Significant correlations were inserted into multivariate models. Speech comprehension measured as word recognition score at 70 dB with CI was analyzed as (i) a continuous and (ii) a dichotomous variable.
RESULTS RESULTS
All variables that tested preoperative hearing were significantly correlated with the dichotomous target; with the continuous target, all except word comprehension at 65 dB with hearing aid. The strongest correlation with postoperative speech comprehension was seen for monosyllabic words with hearing aid at 80 dB. The preoperative maximum word comprehension was reached or surpassed by 97.3% of CI patients. Meningitis and congenital diseases were strongly negatively associated with postoperative word comprehension. The multivariate model was able to explain 40% of postoperative variability.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Speech comprehension with hearing aid at 80 dB can be used as a supplementary preoperative indicator of CI-aided speech comprehension and should be measured regularly in the clinical routine. Combining audiological and aetiological variables provides more insights into the variability of the CI outcome, allowing for better patient counselling.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37176702
pii: jcm12093262
doi: 10.3390/jcm12093262
pmc: PMC10179556
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Cochlear Europe Ltd.
ID : IIR2193

Références

HNO. 2020 Mar;68(3):171-176
pubmed: 31440774
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Oct;37(9):1314-9
pubmed: 27579834
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jun;277(6):1625-1635
pubmed: 32140773
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Jun;108(25):433-43; quiz 444
pubmed: 21776317
Laryngorhinootologie. 2017 Apr;96(S 01):S123-S151
pubmed: 28499298
HNO. 2005 Sep;53(9):773-8
pubmed: 15502895
Laryngorhinootologie. 2017 Apr;96(S 01):S43-S65
pubmed: 28499294
Clin Otolaryngol. 2016 Oct;41(5):585-92
pubmed: 26493690
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Dec;134(12):1276-81
pubmed: 19075122
HNO. 2015 Mar;63(3):195-214
pubmed: 25720301
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2006 Dec;45(6):377-84
pubmed: 17123220
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Apr;140(4):473-6
pubmed: 19328332
Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(1):36-47
pubmed: 23095305
Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 20;8(1):18004
pubmed: 30573747
HNO. 2020 Jan;68(1):40-47
pubmed: 31728573
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2014 Jun;131(3):177-82
pubmed: 24889283
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211037525
pubmed: 34524944
Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):342-60
pubmed: 23348845
HNO. 2011 May;59(5):437-46
pubmed: 21505923
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Dec;37(10):1662-1668
pubmed: 27755365
HNO. 2004 Apr;52(4):321-8
pubmed: 15143763
Ear Hear. 2010 Apr;31(2):186-94
pubmed: 20071994
Cochlear Implants Int. 2007 Mar;8(1):1-11
pubmed: 17479968
HNO. 2019 Mar;67(3):199-206
pubmed: 30635677
HNO. 1999 Feb;47(2):95-100
pubmed: 10197275
Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd. 1953;162(5):394-431
pubmed: 13092895
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 Apr;106(15):262-8
pubmed: 19547627
Clin Otolaryngol. 2018 Feb;43(1):182-191
pubmed: 28710824
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 Mar;106(11):184-9
pubmed: 19568374
Arch Neurol. 2011 Feb;68(2):214-20
pubmed: 21320988
HNO. 2009 Jul;57(7):635-48
pubmed: 19517079
HNO. 2019 Jun;67(Suppl 2):62-68
pubmed: 30944946
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Dec;131(12):1049-54
pubmed: 16365217
Laryngorhinootologie. 2017 Apr;96(4):234-238
pubmed: 28099984
HNO. 2016 Aug;64(8):601-7
pubmed: 27393292
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Nov;141(11):1012-7
pubmed: 26469680
HNO. 2016 Aug;64(8):564-71
pubmed: 27286728
HNO. 2016 Aug;64(8):557-63
pubmed: 27299891
Otol Neurotol. 2004 May;25(3):298-301
pubmed: 15129109
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48739
pubmed: 23152797
HNO. 2017 Aug;65(Suppl 2):98-108
pubmed: 28188428
Audiol Neurootol. 2014;19 Suppl 1:15-20
pubmed: 25733361
Laryngoscope. 2021 Mar;131(3):E940-E945
pubmed: 32484949
HNO. 2016 Aug;64(8):540-8
pubmed: 27259640
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015 Jan;70(1):85-90
pubmed: 25024235
Audiol Neurootol. 2017;22(3):169-179
pubmed: 29059669
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jan 02;3(4):240-254
pubmed: 29780970
HNO. 2016 Aug;64(8):538-9
pubmed: 27455987

Auteurs

Jan-Henrik Rieck (JH)

Medical Faculty, CAU Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.

Annika Beyer (A)

Audiology, ENT Clinic, UKSH Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.

Alexander Mewes (A)

Audiology, ENT Clinic, UKSH Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.

Amke Caliebe (A)

Institute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, CAU Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.

Matthias Hey (M)

Audiology, ENT Clinic, UKSH Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.

Classifications MeSH