Literacy-related differences in morphological knowledge: A nonce-word study.

Spanish imperfect individual differences literacy morphological productivity preterite verbal morphology/derivation

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 02 01 2023
accepted: 29 03 2023
medline: 14 5 2023
pubmed: 14 5 2023
entrez: 14 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Using a nonce-word inflection task, we examine the morphosyntactic productivity of adult native speakers of Spanish who are either beginning to learn to read and write (semi-literates) or have acquired literacy in late adulthood (late-literates), as well as age-matched controls (high-literates). High-literates consistently provided the appropriate form more often than late-literates, who in turn were better than semi-literate participants. Crucially, group interacted with person, number, and conjugation, such that the between-group differences were larger for the less frequent cells in the paradigm, indicating that literacy-related differences are not merely a consequence of the high-literacy group being more engaged or test-wise. This suggests that the availability of written representations may facilitate the acquisition of certain aspects of grammar. We also observed vast individual differences in productivity with inflectional endings. These results add to the growing body of research which challenges the assumption that all native speakers converge on the same grammar early in development.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37179849
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136337
pmc: PMC10171427
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1136337

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Dąbrowska, Pascual, Macías-Gómez-Estern and Llompart.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Cognition. 2022 Jul;224:104958
pubmed: 35339943
Cognition. 2018 Jun 7;178:222-235
pubmed: 29886057
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 11;10(3):e0119613
pubmed: 25760035
Span J Psychol. 2018 May 15;21:E13
pubmed: 29759091
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Aug;46(8):1590-1610
pubmed: 32162959
Psychol Sci. 2018 Aug;29(8):1358-1369
pubmed: 29911926
J Child Lang. 2002 Aug;29(3):591-622
pubmed: 12109365
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1997 Sep;3(5):444-50
pubmed: 9322403
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Feb;22(2):154-169
pubmed: 29277256
J Child Lang. 2006 Aug;33(3):559-97
pubmed: 17017279
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Oct;53(5):1349-71
pubmed: 20719869
J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 May;12(3):364-82
pubmed: 10931764
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 May;43(5):1040-1056
pubmed: 28263636

Auteurs

Ewa Dąbrowska (E)

Chair of Language and Cognition, Department of English and American Studies, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Department of English Language and Linguistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Esther Pascual (E)

Institute of Linguistics, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China.

Beatriz Macías-Gómez-Estern (B)

Department of Social Anthropology, Basic Psychology and Public Health, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.

Miquel Llompart (M)

Chair of Language and Cognition, Department of English and American Studies, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Department of Translation and Language Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.

Classifications MeSH