Psychometric properties of the job anxiety scale.

health outcome job anxeity job worries psychology psychometric properties

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 16 08 2022
accepted: 23 02 2023
pubmed: 14 5 2023
medline: 14 5 2023
entrez: 14 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Occupational stress and specifically job anxiety are crucial factors in determining health outcomes, job satisfaction as well as performance. In order to assess this phenomenon, the Job Anxiety Scale (JAS) is one of the instruments available. It consists of 70 items that are clustered in 14 subscales and five dimensions. This manuscript is a revised version of a retracted article that analyzed the properties of a short version of the JAS. Rather than shortening the scale, the authors of the JAS recommend to further assess the scale in its current state without modification of the factor structure. Hence, the aim of this paper is to assess the psychometric properties of the original JAS. The sample consists of 991 - mostly psychosomatic - patients from two different clinics. We applied methods of factor analysis and bivariate correlations to explore and test factor structure and the nomological net of related constructs. The Job Anxiety Scale evinced satisfactory psychometric properties. We found very high internal consistency, and invariance across participant age. It displayed good discriminant validity and we found the expected pattern of convergent correlations. However, the model fit is not convincing. With the Job Anxiety Scale, researchers can assess job related worries in a reliable manner. The questionnaire is particularly useful in large-scale surveys, in therapy or work-related contexts. However, the scale could be modified in order to aim for a better fit and assess job related anxiety in a more efficient way.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Occupational stress and specifically job anxiety are crucial factors in determining health outcomes, job satisfaction as well as performance. In order to assess this phenomenon, the Job Anxiety Scale (JAS) is one of the instruments available. It consists of 70 items that are clustered in 14 subscales and five dimensions. This manuscript is a revised version of a retracted article that analyzed the properties of a short version of the JAS. Rather than shortening the scale, the authors of the JAS recommend to further assess the scale in its current state without modification of the factor structure. Hence, the aim of this paper is to assess the psychometric properties of the original JAS.
Methods UNASSIGNED
The sample consists of 991 - mostly psychosomatic - patients from two different clinics. We applied methods of factor analysis and bivariate correlations to explore and test factor structure and the nomological net of related constructs.
Results UNASSIGNED
The Job Anxiety Scale evinced satisfactory psychometric properties. We found very high internal consistency, and invariance across participant age. It displayed good discriminant validity and we found the expected pattern of convergent correlations. However, the model fit is not convincing.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
With the Job Anxiety Scale, researchers can assess job related worries in a reliable manner. The questionnaire is particularly useful in large-scale surveys, in therapy or work-related contexts. However, the scale could be modified in order to aim for a better fit and assess job related anxiety in a more efficient way.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37179888
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1020596
pmc: PMC10167290
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1020596

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Schmalbach, Schmalbach, Kalkbrenner, Bassler, Hinz and Petrowski.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Ileana Schmalbach (I)

University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Bjarne Schmalbach (B)

University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Andreas Kalkbrenner (A)

Dresden University of Technology, Carl Gustav Carus Medical Faculty, Department of General Medicine/MK3, Dresden, Germany.

Markus Bassler (M)

Hochschule Nordhausen, University of Applied Sciences, Nordhausen, Germany.

Andreas Hinz (A)

Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Katja Petrowski (K)

University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Dresden University of Technology, Carl Gustav Carus Medical Faculty, Department of General Medicine/MK3, Dresden, Germany.

Classifications MeSH