Effectiveness of interventions to address different types of vulnerabilities in community-dwelling older adults: An umbrella review.


Journal

Campbell systematic reviews
ISSN: 1891-1803
Titre abrégé: Campbell Syst Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918227275506676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 14 5 2023
medline: 14 5 2023
entrez: 14 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Frailty, social isolation, loneliness, and poverty may render older adults vulnerable to social or health stressors. It is imperative to identify effective interventions to address them especially in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. To identify effective community-based interventions to address frailty, social isolation, loneliness, and poverty among community-dwelling older adults. Umbrella review. We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, EBM-Reviews, CINAHL via EBSCO, and APA PsycInfo via Ovid from January 2009 to December 2022. We included systematic reviews or quantitative reviews of non-pharmacologic interventions targeting community-dwelling older adults. Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts, performed data extraction and appraised the methodological quality of the reviews. We used a narrative synthesis approach to summarize and interpret the findings. We assessed the methodological quality of the studies using AMSTAR 2.0 tool. We identified 27 reviews incorporating 372 unique primary studies that met our inclusion criteria. Ten of the reviews included studies conducted in low-middle-income countries. Twelve reviews (46%, 12/26) included interventions that addressed frailty. Seventeen reviews (65%, 17/26) included interventions that addressed either social isolation or loneliness. Eighteen reviews included studies with single component interventions, while 23 reviews included studies with multi-component interventions. Interventions including protein supplementation combined with physical activity may improve outcomes including frailty status, grip strength, and body weight. Physical activity alone or in combination with diet may prevent frailty. Additionally, physical activity may improve social functioning and interventions using digital technologies may decrease social isolation and loneliness. We did not find any review of interventions addressing poverty among older adults. We also noted that few reviews addressed multiple vulnerabilities within the same study, specifically addressed vulnerability among ethnic and sexual minority groups, or examined interventions that engaged communities and adapted programs to local needs. Evidence from reviews support diets, physical activity, and digital technologies to improve frailty, social isolation or loneliness. However, interventions examined were primarily conducted under optimal conditions. There is a need for further interventions in community settings and conducted under real world settings in older adults living with multiple vulnerabilities.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Frailty, social isolation, loneliness, and poverty may render older adults vulnerable to social or health stressors. It is imperative to identify effective interventions to address them especially in the context of COVID-19 pandemic.
Objective UNASSIGNED
To identify effective community-based interventions to address frailty, social isolation, loneliness, and poverty among community-dwelling older adults.
Design UNASSIGNED
Umbrella review.
Data Source UNASSIGNED
We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, EBM-Reviews, CINAHL via EBSCO, and APA PsycInfo via Ovid from January 2009 to December 2022.
Eligibility Criteria UNASSIGNED
We included systematic reviews or quantitative reviews of non-pharmacologic interventions targeting community-dwelling older adults.
Data Selection Extraction and Management UNASSIGNED
Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts, performed data extraction and appraised the methodological quality of the reviews. We used a narrative synthesis approach to summarize and interpret the findings. We assessed the methodological quality of the studies using AMSTAR 2.0 tool.
Results UNASSIGNED
We identified 27 reviews incorporating 372 unique primary studies that met our inclusion criteria. Ten of the reviews included studies conducted in low-middle-income countries. Twelve reviews (46%, 12/26) included interventions that addressed frailty. Seventeen reviews (65%, 17/26) included interventions that addressed either social isolation or loneliness. Eighteen reviews included studies with single component interventions, while 23 reviews included studies with multi-component interventions. Interventions including protein supplementation combined with physical activity may improve outcomes including frailty status, grip strength, and body weight. Physical activity alone or in combination with diet may prevent frailty. Additionally, physical activity may improve social functioning and interventions using digital technologies may decrease social isolation and loneliness. We did not find any review of interventions addressing poverty among older adults. We also noted that few reviews addressed multiple vulnerabilities within the same study, specifically addressed vulnerability among ethnic and sexual minority groups, or examined interventions that engaged communities and adapted programs to local needs.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Evidence from reviews support diets, physical activity, and digital technologies to improve frailty, social isolation or loneliness. However, interventions examined were primarily conducted under optimal conditions. There is a need for further interventions in community settings and conducted under real world settings in older adults living with multiple vulnerabilities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37180567
doi: 10.1002/cl2.1323
pii: CL21323
pmc: PMC10168691
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

e1323

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Campbell Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Campbell Collaboration.

Auteurs

Rhéda Adekpedjou (R)

Carrefour de l'innovation et de l'évaluation en santé Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Montréal Canada.

Pascale Léon (P)

Carrefour de l'innovation et de l'évaluation en santé Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Montréal Canada.

Omar Dewidar (O)

Bruyère Research Institute University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.

Ali Al-Zubaidi (A)

Bruyère Research Institute University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.

Jalila Jbilou (J)

Centre de formation médicale du Nouveau-Brunswick et École de psychologie, Faculté des sciences de la santé et des services communautaires Université de Moncton Nouveau-Brunswick Canada.

Janusz Kaczorowski (J)

Carrefour de l'innovation et de l'évaluation en santé Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Montréal Canada.

John Muscedere (J)

Department of Critical Care Medicine Queens University and Canadian Frailty Network Kingston Ontario Canada.

John Hirdes (J)

Centre de formation médicale du Nouveau-Brunswick et École de psychologie, Faculté des sciences de la santé et des services communautaires Université de Moncton Nouveau-Brunswick Canada.

George Heckman (G)

School of Public Health and Health Systems University of Waterloo Waterloo Canada.
Schlegel Research Institute for Aging Waterloo Canada.

Magali Girard (M)

Bureau de Recherche Développement Valorisation Université de Montréal Montréal Canada.

Paul C Hébert (PC)

Carrefour de l'innovation et de l'évaluation en santé Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Montréal Canada.
Bruyère Research Institute University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.

Classifications MeSH