An educational intervention to promote a culture of gender equity among persons with traumatic brain injury and caregivers: A pilot study.

biological sex brain injuries concussion education gender role knowledge acquisition rehabilitation

Journal

Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences
ISSN: 2673-6861
Titre abrégé: Front Rehabil Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9918227358906676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 07 02 2023
accepted: 04 04 2023
pubmed: 14 5 2023
medline: 14 5 2023
entrez: 14 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes are dependent on patients' biological sex (e.g., hormone levels) and sociocultural gender (e.g., norms, responsibilities). Informal caregivers additionally experience disruptions to identity and roles post-TBI. However, information on this topic remains largely unavailable to patients and caregivers. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a one-time educational intervention on sex and gender influences in TBI for patients and informal caregivers. We conducted a pilot pre-test/post-test randomized control-group design study. Groups (i.e., passive, active and control) consisted a total of 16 persons with TBI and caregivers (75% persons with TBI, 63% women). Individual and group learning gains, and group-average normalized gain, were computed for three learning domains: knowledge, attitude, and skill. An intervention with an average normalized gain of ≥30% was considered effective. Educational intervention evaluation and qualitative comments post-participation were summarized. The passive group demonstrated the highest average normalized gain across the three learning domains, including 100% for knowledge, 40% and 61% for attitude, and 37% for skill. The remaining groups did not reach an average normalized gain of ≥30%, except for the attitude domain of the control group (33% and 32%). Two key categories were identified qualitatively: (1) gendered self-expectations post-injury and (2) implications of gender stereotypes in rehabilitation, including the need for rehabilitation treatment to look beyond sex and gender. The post-participation educational session evaluation conveyed high appraisal of content, organization, and usability of the intervention. A one-time passive educational intervention on sex and gender in TBI may improve knowledge, attitude, and skill on the topic of sex and gender among adults with TBI and caregivers. Obtaining knowledge and skill on sex and gender effects in TBI can potentially help persons with TBI and caregivers adapt to changes in roles and behaviours post-injury.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes are dependent on patients' biological sex (e.g., hormone levels) and sociocultural gender (e.g., norms, responsibilities). Informal caregivers additionally experience disruptions to identity and roles post-TBI. However, information on this topic remains largely unavailable to patients and caregivers.
Purpose UNASSIGNED
This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a one-time educational intervention on sex and gender influences in TBI for patients and informal caregivers.
Materials and methods UNASSIGNED
We conducted a pilot pre-test/post-test randomized control-group design study. Groups (i.e., passive, active and control) consisted a total of 16 persons with TBI and caregivers (75% persons with TBI, 63% women). Individual and group learning gains, and group-average normalized gain, were computed for three learning domains: knowledge, attitude, and skill. An intervention with an average normalized gain of ≥30% was considered effective. Educational intervention evaluation and qualitative comments post-participation were summarized.
Results UNASSIGNED
The passive group demonstrated the highest average normalized gain across the three learning domains, including 100% for knowledge, 40% and 61% for attitude, and 37% for skill. The remaining groups did not reach an average normalized gain of ≥30%, except for the attitude domain of the control group (33% and 32%). Two key categories were identified qualitatively: (1) gendered self-expectations post-injury and (2) implications of gender stereotypes in rehabilitation, including the need for rehabilitation treatment to look beyond sex and gender. The post-participation educational session evaluation conveyed high appraisal of content, organization, and usability of the intervention.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
A one-time passive educational intervention on sex and gender in TBI may improve knowledge, attitude, and skill on the topic of sex and gender among adults with TBI and caregivers. Obtaining knowledge and skill on sex and gender effects in TBI can potentially help persons with TBI and caregivers adapt to changes in roles and behaviours post-injury.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37180573
doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1160850
pmc: PMC10169667
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1160850

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Hanafy, Quilico, Haag, Khoo, Munce, Lindsay, Colantonio and Mollayeva.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Sara Hanafy (S)

Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Enrico Quilico (E)

Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Halina Lin Haag (HL)

Faculty of Social Work, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Yuelee Ben Khoo (YB)

KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Sarah Munce (S)

Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University ofToronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Sally Lindsay (S)

Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University ofToronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Angela Colantonio (A)

Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University ofToronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Tatyana Mollayeva (T)

Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University ofToronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Classifications MeSH