Internal replacement of a vertebral body in pseudarthrosis-Armed kyphoplasty with bone graft-filled stents: Case report.
armed kyphoplasty
bone graft
pseudarthrosis
stents
vertebral necrosis
Journal
Frontiers in surgery
ISSN: 2296-875X
Titre abrégé: Front Surg
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101645127
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
12
01
2023
accepted:
20
03
2023
medline:
14
5
2023
pubmed:
14
5
2023
entrez:
14
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Post-traumatic vertebral necrosis and pseudarthrosis represents one of the most concerning and unpredictable challenges in spinal traumatology. The evolution of this disease at the thoracolumbar transition usually courses with progressive bone resorption and necrosis, leading to vertebral collapse, retropulsion of the posterior wall and neurological injury. As such, the therapeutic goal is the interruption of this cascade, seeking to stabilize the vertebral body and avoid the negative consequences of its collapse. We present a clinical case of a pseudarthrosis of T12 vertebral body with severe posterior wall collapse, treated with removal of intravertebral pseudarthrosis focus by transpedicular access, T12 armed kyphoplasty with VBS® stents filled with cancellous bone autograft, laminectomy and stabilization with T10-T11-L1-L2 pedicle screws. We present clinical and imaging detailed results at 2-year follow-up and discuss our option for this biological minimally invasive treatment for vertebral pseudarthrosis that mimics the general principles of atrophic pseudarthrosis therapeutic and allows to perform an internal replacement of the necrotic vertebral body, avoiding the aggression of a total corpectomy. This clinical case demonstrates a successful outcome of the surgical treatment of pseudarthrosis of vertebral body (mobile nonunion vertebral body) in which expandable intravertebral stents allow to perform an internal replacement of the necrotic vertebral body by creating intrasomatic cavities and filling them with bone graft, obtaining a totally bony vertebra with a metallic endoskeleton, which is biomechanically and physiologically more similar to the original one. This biological internal replacement of the necrotic vertebral body technique can be a safe and effective alternative over cementoplasty procedures or total vertebral body corpectomy and replacement for vertebral pseudarthrosis and may have several advantages over them, however long-term prospective studies are needed in order to prove the effectiveness and advantages of this surgical option in this rare and difficult pathological entity.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Post-traumatic vertebral necrosis and pseudarthrosis represents one of the most concerning and unpredictable challenges in spinal traumatology. The evolution of this disease at the thoracolumbar transition usually courses with progressive bone resorption and necrosis, leading to vertebral collapse, retropulsion of the posterior wall and neurological injury. As such, the therapeutic goal is the interruption of this cascade, seeking to stabilize the vertebral body and avoid the negative consequences of its collapse.
Case description
UNASSIGNED
We present a clinical case of a pseudarthrosis of T12 vertebral body with severe posterior wall collapse, treated with removal of intravertebral pseudarthrosis focus by transpedicular access, T12 armed kyphoplasty with VBS® stents filled with cancellous bone autograft, laminectomy and stabilization with T10-T11-L1-L2 pedicle screws. We present clinical and imaging detailed results at 2-year follow-up and discuss our option for this biological minimally invasive treatment for vertebral pseudarthrosis that mimics the general principles of atrophic pseudarthrosis therapeutic and allows to perform an internal replacement of the necrotic vertebral body, avoiding the aggression of a total corpectomy.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
This clinical case demonstrates a successful outcome of the surgical treatment of pseudarthrosis of vertebral body (mobile nonunion vertebral body) in which expandable intravertebral stents allow to perform an internal replacement of the necrotic vertebral body by creating intrasomatic cavities and filling them with bone graft, obtaining a totally bony vertebra with a metallic endoskeleton, which is biomechanically and physiologically more similar to the original one. This biological internal replacement of the necrotic vertebral body technique can be a safe and effective alternative over cementoplasty procedures or total vertebral body corpectomy and replacement for vertebral pseudarthrosis and may have several advantages over them, however long-term prospective studies are needed in order to prove the effectiveness and advantages of this surgical option in this rare and difficult pathological entity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37181593
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1142679
pmc: PMC10172676
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
1142679Informations de copyright
© 2023 Moura and Cavaca.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Asian Spine J. 2018 Jun;12(3):586-599
pubmed: 29879789
Spine J. 2017 Oct;17(10):1489-1498
pubmed: 28506822
J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Jan;18(1):24-9
pubmed: 12510802
Acta Ortop Bras. 2022 May 23;30(3):e245117
pubmed: 35694022
Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Mar 15;18(3):e10
pubmed: 15771390
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Oct 15;23(20):2201-6
pubmed: 9802162
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1981 May;10(4):271-7
pubmed: 6454253
J Spinal Disord. 2001 Oct;14(5):393-8
pubmed: 11586138
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Jun;11(6):603-609
pubmed: 30552168
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Aug 1;19(15):1741-4
pubmed: 7973969
Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2011 May;8(2):38-42
pubmed: 22461815
Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1172-8
pubmed: 24321130
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019 Nov;42(11):1579-1587
pubmed: 31201507
Acta Orthop Scand. 1999 Dec;70(6):555-8
pubmed: 10665718
Surg Technol Int. 2011 Dec;21:268-77
pubmed: 22505001
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4):E100-8
pubmed: 18277858
Acta Orthop Belg. 2009 Dec;75(6):815-21
pubmed: 20166365
Arthritis Rheum. 2003 May;48(5):1414-9
pubmed: 12746915
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1981 May;10(4):264-70
pubmed: 6454252
Radiology. 1978 Oct;129(1):23-9
pubmed: 693884
Acta Orthop Belg. 2002 Feb;68(1):13-9
pubmed: 11915453
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jan 1;26(1):88-99
pubmed: 11148651
Unfallchirurg. 1986 May;89(5):197-213
pubmed: 3523761
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Aug 08;14:233
pubmed: 23927056
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952
pubmed: 11074683
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Mar 15;33(6):658-67
pubmed: 18344860
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 May;25(4):270-5
pubmed: 12021746
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jan 15;26(2):213-7
pubmed: 11154543
Spine J. 2002 Mar-Apr;2(2):101-6
pubmed: 14588268
Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):883-91
pubmed: 23053751
Eur Spine J. 1994;3(1):45-51
pubmed: 7874541
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Nov-Dec;23(10):1642-6
pubmed: 12427615
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(8):1208-15
pubmed: 16767527
Neuroradiol J. 2011 Aug 31;24(4):610-9
pubmed: 24059720
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Aug;26(7):1634-40
pubmed: 16091506
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:434873
pubmed: 26137481
J Spine Surg. 2021 Dec;7(4):524-531
pubmed: 35128127
Spine J. 2014 Apr;14(4):659-66
pubmed: 24055039
Int Orthop. 2004 Feb;28(1):52-5
pubmed: 12955479
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jun;86(6):1230-8
pubmed: 15173297
Eur Spine J. 2018 Oct;27(10):2602-2608
pubmed: 30099668
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 May;79(3):452-6
pubmed: 9180328
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2012 Jul;3(2):47-51
pubmed: 24082683
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015 Jun;24(3):161-6
pubmed: 25263584
Int Orthop. 2003;27(2):65-9
pubmed: 12700926
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Jan;13(1):63-68
pubmed: 32938744
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 24;15(1):348
pubmed: 32831125
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jul 15;28(14):1588-92
pubmed: 12865850
Surg Technol Int. 2005;14:287-96
pubmed: 16525985
Cureus. 2021 Sep 7;13(9):e17795
pubmed: 34660005
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jan;8(2):35
pubmed: 32055626
J Spine Surg. 2016 Mar;2(1):13-20
pubmed: 27683690
Eur Radiol. 2018 Dec;28(12):4985-4991
pubmed: 29948067