Health facility delivery and early initiation of breastfeeding: Cross-sectional survey of 11 sub-Saharan African countries.
early initiation of breastfeeding
global health
neonatal health
newborn
sub‐Saharan Africa
Journal
Health science reports
ISSN: 2398-8835
Titre abrégé: Health Sci Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101728855
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
received:
02
01
2023
revised:
20
04
2023
accepted:
01
05
2023
medline:
14
5
2023
pubmed:
14
5
2023
entrez:
14
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early initiation of breastfeeding (EIB) remains one of the promising interventions for preventing neonatal and child deaths. EIB is positively associated with healthcare delivery or childbirth. Meanwhile, no study in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) appears to have investigated the relationship between health facility delivery and EIB; thus, we assessed the correlation between health facility delivery and EIB. We used data from the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) of 64,506 women from 11 SSA countries. The outcome variable was whether the respondent had early breastfeeding or not. Two logistic regression models were used in the inferential analysis. With a 95% confidence interval (CI), the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for each variable were calculated. The data set was stored, managed, and analyzed using Stata version 13. The overall percentage of women who initiated early breastfeeding was 59.22%. Rwanda recorded the highest percentage of early initiation of breastfeeding (86.34%), while Gambia recorded the lowest (39.44%). The adjusted model revealed a significant association between health facility delivery and EIB (aOR = 1.80, CI = 1.73-1.87). Compared with urban women, rural women had higher likelihood of initiating early breastfeeding (aOR = 1.22, CI = 1.16-1.27). Women with a primary education (aOR = 1.26, CI = 1.20-1.32), secondary education (aOR = 1.12, CI = 1.06-1.17), and higher (aOR = 1.13, CI = 1.02-1.25), all had higher odds of initiating early breastfeeding. Women with the richest wealth status had the highest odds of initiating early breastfeeding as compared to the poorest women (aOR = 1.33, CI = 1.23-1.43). Based on our findings, we strongly advocate for the integration of EIB policies and initiatives with healthcare delivery advocacy. Integration of these efforts can result in drastic reduction in infant and child mortality. Essentially, Gambia and other countries with a lower proclivity for EIB must reconsider their current breastfeeding interventions and conduct the necessary reviews and modifications that can lead to an increase in EIB.
Sections du résumé
Background and Aims
UNASSIGNED
Early initiation of breastfeeding (EIB) remains one of the promising interventions for preventing neonatal and child deaths. EIB is positively associated with healthcare delivery or childbirth. Meanwhile, no study in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) appears to have investigated the relationship between health facility delivery and EIB; thus, we assessed the correlation between health facility delivery and EIB.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We used data from the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) of 64,506 women from 11 SSA countries. The outcome variable was whether the respondent had early breastfeeding or not. Two logistic regression models were used in the inferential analysis. With a 95% confidence interval (CI), the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for each variable were calculated. The data set was stored, managed, and analyzed using Stata version 13.
Results
UNASSIGNED
The overall percentage of women who initiated early breastfeeding was 59.22%. Rwanda recorded the highest percentage of early initiation of breastfeeding (86.34%), while Gambia recorded the lowest (39.44%). The adjusted model revealed a significant association between health facility delivery and EIB (aOR = 1.80, CI = 1.73-1.87). Compared with urban women, rural women had higher likelihood of initiating early breastfeeding (aOR = 1.22, CI = 1.16-1.27). Women with a primary education (aOR = 1.26, CI = 1.20-1.32), secondary education (aOR = 1.12, CI = 1.06-1.17), and higher (aOR = 1.13, CI = 1.02-1.25), all had higher odds of initiating early breastfeeding. Women with the richest wealth status had the highest odds of initiating early breastfeeding as compared to the poorest women (aOR = 1.33, CI = 1.23-1.43).
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Based on our findings, we strongly advocate for the integration of EIB policies and initiatives with healthcare delivery advocacy. Integration of these efforts can result in drastic reduction in infant and child mortality. Essentially, Gambia and other countries with a lower proclivity for EIB must reconsider their current breastfeeding interventions and conduct the necessary reviews and modifications that can lead to an increase in EIB.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37181665
doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1263
pii: HSR21263
pmc: PMC10173260
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e1263Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare there is no conflict of interest. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Sanni Yaya had full access to all of the data in this study and took complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Références
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Apr;4(4):e266-75
pubmed: 27013313
BMC Public Health. 2013;13 Suppl 3:S19
pubmed: 24564770
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 28;22(1):1062
pubmed: 35624450
Int Breastfeed J. 2016 Jun 18;11:17
pubmed: 27330542
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 4;16(11):e0259250
pubmed: 34735506
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD000389
pubmed: 11869574
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40220
pubmed: 22808121
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2014 Sep;24 Suppl:81-92
pubmed: 25489185
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):765
pubmed: 29921275
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD001688
pubmed: 15846621
Int Breastfeed J. 2022 Feb 22;17(1):12
pubmed: 35193639
Reprod Health. 2021 Aug 4;18(1):167
pubmed: 34348728
Afr Health Sci. 2014 Jun;14(2):322-33
pubmed: 25320580
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 8;14(8):e0220836
pubmed: 31393923
Int Breastfeed J. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):14
pubmed: 33482847
J Fam Issues. 2011 Feb 3;32(7):876-905
pubmed: 21643456
J Glob Health. 2019 Jun;9(1):010417
pubmed: 30774943
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Aug 14;12(8):9562-74
pubmed: 26287223
Int Breastfeed J. 2020 Feb 18;15(1):10
pubmed: 32070375
Rural Remote Health. 2008 Jul-Sep;8(3):1021
pubmed: 18771338
Midwifery. 2021 Oct;101:103065
pubmed: 34161917
Int Breastfeed J. 2019 Jul 31;14:33
pubmed: 31384286
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):475-90
pubmed: 26869575
BMC Pediatr. 2012 Jul 24;12:105
pubmed: 22827969
Int Health. 2020 Feb 12;12(2):132-141
pubmed: 31294780
Int Breastfeed J. 2019 Sep 11;14:40
pubmed: 31528197
Clin Exp Pediatr. 2022 Apr;65(4):201-208
pubmed: 34665960
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):235-41; quiz 242-3
pubmed: 23571424
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Nov;4(11):e845-e855
pubmed: 27670090
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 24;15(9):e0239446
pubmed: 32970729
Int Breastfeed J. 2014 Dec 05;9(1):21
pubmed: 25493094
Arch Public Health. 2020 Nov 23;78(1):124
pubmed: 33292575
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 20;10(4):e032835
pubmed: 32317258
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 May 10;13:174
pubmed: 23663299
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Aug 12;8:345
pubmed: 26264412
Curationis. 2006 May;29(2):87-95
pubmed: 16910138
Pediatrics. 2006 Mar;117(3):e380-6
pubmed: 16510618
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 16;13(8):e0202508
pubmed: 30114288
BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 25;13:171
pubmed: 23442221