Multi-omic modeling of antidepressant response implicates dynamic immune and inflammatory changes in individuals who respond to treatment.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
27
01
2023
accepted:
15
04
2023
medline:
17
5
2023
pubmed:
15
5
2023
entrez:
15
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and is commonly treated with antidepressant drugs (AD). Although effective, many patients fail to respond to AD treatment, and accordingly identifying factors that can predict AD response would greatly improve treatment outcomes. In this study, we developed a machine learning tool to integrate multi-omic datasets (gene expression, DNA methylation, and genotyping) to identify biomarker profiles associated with AD response in a cohort of individuals with MDD. Individuals with MDD (N = 111) were treated for 8 weeks with antidepressants and were separated into responders and non-responders based on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Using peripheral blood samples, we performed RNA-sequencing, assessed DNA methylation using the Illumina EPIC array, and performed genotyping using the Illumina PsychArray. To address this rich multi-omic dataset with high dimensional features, we developed integrative Geneset-Embedded non-negative Matrix factorization (iGEM), a non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) based model, supplemented with auxiliary information regarding gene sets and gene-methylation relationships. In particular, we factorize the subjects by features (i.e., gene expression or DNA methylation) into subjects-by-factors and factors-by-features. We define the factors as the meta-phenotypes as they represent integrated composite scores of the molecular measurements for each subject. Using our model, we identified a number of meta-phenotypes which were related to AD response. By integrating geneset information into the model, we were able to relate these meta-phenotypes to biological processes, including a meta-phenotype related to immune and inflammatory functions as well as other genes related to depression or AD response. The meta-phenotype identified several genes including immune interleukin 1 receptor like 1 (IL1RL1) and interleukin 5 receptor (IL5) subunit alpha (IL5RA), AKT/PIK3 pathway related phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 6 (PIK3R6), and sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 3 (SMPD3), which has been identified as a target of AD treatment. The derived meta-phenotypes and associated biological functions represent both biomarkers to predict response, as well as potential new treatment targets. Our method is applicable to other diseases with multi-omic data, and the software is open source and available on Github (https://github.com/li-lab-mcgill/iGEM).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and is commonly treated with antidepressant drugs (AD). Although effective, many patients fail to respond to AD treatment, and accordingly identifying factors that can predict AD response would greatly improve treatment outcomes. In this study, we developed a machine learning tool to integrate multi-omic datasets (gene expression, DNA methylation, and genotyping) to identify biomarker profiles associated with AD response in a cohort of individuals with MDD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Individuals with MDD (N = 111) were treated for 8 weeks with antidepressants and were separated into responders and non-responders based on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Using peripheral blood samples, we performed RNA-sequencing, assessed DNA methylation using the Illumina EPIC array, and performed genotyping using the Illumina PsychArray. To address this rich multi-omic dataset with high dimensional features, we developed integrative Geneset-Embedded non-negative Matrix factorization (iGEM), a non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) based model, supplemented with auxiliary information regarding gene sets and gene-methylation relationships. In particular, we factorize the subjects by features (i.e., gene expression or DNA methylation) into subjects-by-factors and factors-by-features. We define the factors as the meta-phenotypes as they represent integrated composite scores of the molecular measurements for each subject.
RESULTS
Using our model, we identified a number of meta-phenotypes which were related to AD response. By integrating geneset information into the model, we were able to relate these meta-phenotypes to biological processes, including a meta-phenotype related to immune and inflammatory functions as well as other genes related to depression or AD response. The meta-phenotype identified several genes including immune interleukin 1 receptor like 1 (IL1RL1) and interleukin 5 receptor (IL5) subunit alpha (IL5RA), AKT/PIK3 pathway related phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 6 (PIK3R6), and sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 3 (SMPD3), which has been identified as a target of AD treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
The derived meta-phenotypes and associated biological functions represent both biomarkers to predict response, as well as potential new treatment targets. Our method is applicable to other diseases with multi-omic data, and the software is open source and available on Github (https://github.com/li-lab-mcgill/iGEM).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37186582
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285123
pii: PONE-D-23-02423
pmc: PMC10184917
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antidepressive Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0285123Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Fuh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Oct;20(10):1418-1426
pubmed: 28869584
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Apr 20;43(7):e47
pubmed: 25605792
BMC Med. 2013 Feb 05;11:28
pubmed: 23384232
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Apr;25(4):441-53
pubmed: 25769916
Cell Death Dis. 2017 Mar 30;8(3):e2717
pubmed: 28358367
Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1672-85
pubmed: 26454360
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
pubmed: 17701901
Genome Biol. 2013 Apr 25;14(4):R36
pubmed: 23618408
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 2;81:203-210
pubmed: 28989100
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Jul 30;14:2009-2015
pubmed: 34354360
Nat Med. 2013 Jul;19(7):934-8
pubmed: 23770692
Cell. 2016 Nov 17;167(5):1398-1414.e24
pubmed: 27863251
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 15;31(2):166-9
pubmed: 25260700
Int J Mol Med. 2017 Feb;39(2):327-336
pubmed: 28075471
J Neurochem. 2006 Apr;97 Suppl 1:44-9
pubmed: 16635249
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2021 Aug 10;16:100323
pubmed: 34514441
Psychol Med. 2012 May;42(5):943-56
pubmed: 21995950
Nat Genet. 2015 Jan;47(1):88-91
pubmed: 25436857
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 Sep;41(10):2541-56
pubmed: 27103064
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 13;11(1):632
pubmed: 34903727
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2013 Sep;22(3):175-84
pubmed: 24038301
Biostatistics. 2007 Jan;8(1):118-27
pubmed: 16632515
J Biol Chem. 2007 Sep 7;282(36):26369-80
pubmed: 17623648
Nature. 1999 Oct 21;401(6755):788-91
pubmed: 10548103
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009 Nov;259 Suppl 2:S199-204
pubmed: 19876679
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;192(1):52-8
pubmed: 18174510
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Jun 30;240:421-430
pubmed: 27155594
Cells. 2020 May 18;9(5):
pubmed: 32443534
J Agric Food Chem. 2014 Oct 29;62(43):10493-503
pubmed: 25197951
Bioinformatics. 2005 Nov 1;21(21):3970-5
pubmed: 16244221
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
IEEE Comput Intell Mag. 2018 Aug;13(3):20-31
pubmed: 30467458
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 8;108:110170
pubmed: 33181205
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 7;13(6):e0197268
pubmed: 29879133
Int J Mol Sci. 2015 Apr 08;16(4):7796-801
pubmed: 25856677
Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9
pubmed: 444788
Bioinformatics. 2014 Feb 01;30(3):428-30
pubmed: 24336642
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 21;11(1):439
pubmed: 34420030
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Aug 07;9:862
pubmed: 30131699
J Leukoc Biol. 2002 Nov;72(5):1046-53
pubmed: 12429728
Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 8;9(1):254
pubmed: 31594917
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Nov 30;11:587
pubmed: 21118553
Mol Neuropsychiatry. 2016 Oct;2(3):115-123
pubmed: 27867936
Nature. 2013 Sep 26;501(7468):506-11
pubmed: 24037378
Genome Res. 2002 Jun;12(6):996-1006
pubmed: 12045153
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Sep 18;13(9):e1005766
pubmed: 28922377
Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 2;11(1):1635
pubmed: 32242018
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Jan/Feb;79(1):
pubmed: 29228516
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 15;81(4):306-315
pubmed: 27773352
Bioinformatics. 2017 Feb 15;33(4):558-560
pubmed: 28035024
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):12
pubmed: 35013133
Genes (Basel). 2019 Nov 07;10(11):
pubmed: 31703457
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 8;11(1):469
pubmed: 34508068
Commun Biol. 2021 Jul 22;4(1):903
pubmed: 34294869
Indian J Psychiatry. 2021 Nov-Dec;63(6):549-553
pubmed: 35136251
Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 23;10(1):232
pubmed: 32699209