Intensive chemotherapy with or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin in patients with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia (AMLSG 09-09): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.
Adolescent
Adult
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Young Adult
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ adverse effects
Cytarabine
/ therapeutic use
Gemtuzumab
/ therapeutic use
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
/ drug therapy
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Nuclear Proteins
/ genetics
Treatment Outcome
Tretinoin
/ therapeutic use
Journal
The Lancet. Haematology
ISSN: 2352-3026
Titre abrégé: Lancet Haematol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101643584
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
26
02
2023
revised:
27
03
2023
accepted:
29
03
2023
medline:
7
7
2023
pubmed:
16
5
2023
entrez:
15
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Acute myeloid leukaemia with mutated NPM1 is associated with high CD33 expression and intermediate-risk cytogenetics. The aim of this study was to evaluate intensive chemotherapy with or without the anti-CD33 antibody-drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin in participants with newly diagnosed, NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia. This open-label, phase 3 trial was conducted at 56 hospitals in Germany and Austria. Eligible participants were 18 years or older and had newly diagnosed NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Participants were randomly assigned, using age as a stratification factor (18-60 years vs >60 years), 1:1 to the two treatment groups using allocation concealment; there was no masking of participants and investigators to treatment groups. Participants received two cycles of induction therapy (idarubicin, cytarabine, and etoposide) plus all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) followed by three consolidation cycles of high-dose cytarabine (or an intermediate dose for those older than 60 years) and ATRA, without or with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (3 mg/m Between May 12, 2010, and Sept 1, 2017, 600 participants were enrolled, of which 588 (315 women and 273 men) were randomly assigned (296 to the standard group and 292 to the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group). No difference was found in short-term event-free survival (short-term event-free survival at 6-month follow-up, 53% [95% CI 47-59] in the standard group and 58% [53-64] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·83; 95% CI 0·65-1·04; p=0·10) and overall survival between treatment groups (2-year overall survival, 69% [63-74] in the standard group and 73% [68-78] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; 0·90; 0·70-1·16; p=0·43). There was no difference in complete remission or CRi rates (n=267 [90%] in the standard group vs n=251 [86%] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; odds ratio [OR] 0·67; 95% CI 0·40-1·11; p=0·15) and complete remission or CRh rates (n=214 [72%] vs n=195 [67%]; OR 0·77; 0·54-1·10; p=0·18), whereas the complete remission rate was lower with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (n=172 [58%] vs n=136 [47%]; OR 0·63; 0·45-0·80; p=0·0068). Cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly reduced by gemtuzumab ozogamicin (2-year cumulative incidence of relapse, 37% [95% CI 31-43] in the standard group and 25% [20-30] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; cause-specific HR 0·65; 0·49-0·86; p=0·0028), and there was no difference in the cumulative incidence of death (2-year cumulative incidence of death 6% [4-10] in the standard group and 7% [5-11] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; HR 1·03; 0·59-1·81; p=0·91). There were no differences in the number of days in hospital across all cycles between treatment groups. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (n=135 [47%] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group vs n=122 [41%] in the standard group), thrombocytopenia (n=261 [90%] vs n=265 [90%]), pneumonia (n=71 [25%] vs n=64 [22%]), sepsis (n=85 [29%] vs n=73 [25%]). Treatment-related deaths were documented in 25 participants (4%; n=8 [3%] in the standard group and n=17 [6%] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group), mostly due to sepsis and infections. The primary endpoints of the trial of event-free survival and overall survival were not met. However, an anti-leukaemic efficacy of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in participants with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia is shown by a significantly lower cumulative incidence of relapse rate, suggesting that the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin might reduce the need for salvage therapy in these participants. The results from this study provide further evidence that gemtuzumab ozogamicin should be added in the standard of care treatment in adults with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia. Pfizer and Amgen.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Acute myeloid leukaemia with mutated NPM1 is associated with high CD33 expression and intermediate-risk cytogenetics. The aim of this study was to evaluate intensive chemotherapy with or without the anti-CD33 antibody-drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin in participants with newly diagnosed, NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia.
METHODS
METHODS
This open-label, phase 3 trial was conducted at 56 hospitals in Germany and Austria. Eligible participants were 18 years or older and had newly diagnosed NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Participants were randomly assigned, using age as a stratification factor (18-60 years vs >60 years), 1:1 to the two treatment groups using allocation concealment; there was no masking of participants and investigators to treatment groups. Participants received two cycles of induction therapy (idarubicin, cytarabine, and etoposide) plus all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) followed by three consolidation cycles of high-dose cytarabine (or an intermediate dose for those older than 60 years) and ATRA, without or with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (3 mg/m
FINDINGS
RESULTS
Between May 12, 2010, and Sept 1, 2017, 600 participants were enrolled, of which 588 (315 women and 273 men) were randomly assigned (296 to the standard group and 292 to the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group). No difference was found in short-term event-free survival (short-term event-free survival at 6-month follow-up, 53% [95% CI 47-59] in the standard group and 58% [53-64] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·83; 95% CI 0·65-1·04; p=0·10) and overall survival between treatment groups (2-year overall survival, 69% [63-74] in the standard group and 73% [68-78] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; 0·90; 0·70-1·16; p=0·43). There was no difference in complete remission or CRi rates (n=267 [90%] in the standard group vs n=251 [86%] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; odds ratio [OR] 0·67; 95% CI 0·40-1·11; p=0·15) and complete remission or CRh rates (n=214 [72%] vs n=195 [67%]; OR 0·77; 0·54-1·10; p=0·18), whereas the complete remission rate was lower with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (n=172 [58%] vs n=136 [47%]; OR 0·63; 0·45-0·80; p=0·0068). Cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly reduced by gemtuzumab ozogamicin (2-year cumulative incidence of relapse, 37% [95% CI 31-43] in the standard group and 25% [20-30] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; cause-specific HR 0·65; 0·49-0·86; p=0·0028), and there was no difference in the cumulative incidence of death (2-year cumulative incidence of death 6% [4-10] in the standard group and 7% [5-11] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; HR 1·03; 0·59-1·81; p=0·91). There were no differences in the number of days in hospital across all cycles between treatment groups. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (n=135 [47%] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group vs n=122 [41%] in the standard group), thrombocytopenia (n=261 [90%] vs n=265 [90%]), pneumonia (n=71 [25%] vs n=64 [22%]), sepsis (n=85 [29%] vs n=73 [25%]). Treatment-related deaths were documented in 25 participants (4%; n=8 [3%] in the standard group and n=17 [6%] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group), mostly due to sepsis and infections.
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
The primary endpoints of the trial of event-free survival and overall survival were not met. However, an anti-leukaemic efficacy of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in participants with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia is shown by a significantly lower cumulative incidence of relapse rate, suggesting that the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin might reduce the need for salvage therapy in these participants. The results from this study provide further evidence that gemtuzumab ozogamicin should be added in the standard of care treatment in adults with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
Pfizer and Amgen.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37187198
pii: S2352-3026(23)00089-3
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00089-3
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cytarabine
04079A1RDZ
Gemtuzumab
93NS566KF7
Nuclear Proteins
0
Tretinoin
5688UTC01R
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00893399']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e495-e509Investigateurs
Hartmut Döhner
(H)
Daniela Weber
(D)
Julia Krzykalla
(J)
Walter Fiedler
(W)
Michael W M Kühn
(MWM)
Thomas Schroeder
(T)
Karin Mayer
(K)
Michael Lübbert
(M)
Mohammad Wattad
(M)
Katharina Götze
(K)
Lars Fransecky
(L)
Elisabeth Koller
(E)
Gerald Wulf
(G)
Jan Schleicher
(J)
Mark Ringhoffer
(M)
Richard Greil
(R)
Bernd Hertenstein
(B)
Jürgen Krauter
(J)
Uwe M Martens
(UM)
David Nachbaur
(D)
Maisun Abu Samra
(MA)
Sigrid Machherndl-Spandl
(S)
Nadezda Basara
(N)
Claudia Leis
(C)
Anika Schrade
(A)
Silke Kapp-Schwoerer
(S)
Sibylle Cocciardi
(S)
Lars Bullinger
(L)
Felicitas Thol
(F)
Michael Heuser
(M)
Peter Paschka
(P)
Verena I Gaidzik
(VI)
Maral Saadati
(M)
Axel Benner
(A)
Richard F Schlenk
(RF)
Konstanze Döhner
(K)
Arnold Ganser
(A)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests HD declares being in an advisory role for Abbvie, Agios, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Berlin-Chemie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, GEMoaB, Gilead, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Servier, Stemline, and Syndax; and research funding from Abbvie, Agios, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kronos-Bio, Novartis, and Pfizer. WF declares a membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committee for AbbVie, Amgen, ARIAD/Incyte, Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, MorphoSys, Stemline, Clinigen, Novartis, and Pfizer; patents and royalties from Amgen; support for meeting attendance from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Servier; and research funding from Amgen and Pfizer. MWMK declares being in an advisory role for Abbvie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kura-Oncology, and Pfizer; speakers honoraria from Abbvie and Gilead; travel support from Abbvie, Celgene, and Daiichi Sankyo; and research funding from Kura-Oncology. TS declares being in an advisory role for Abbvie, Astellas, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Takeda, Pfizer Bristol Myers Squibb, and Telix Pharma; speakers honoraria from Abbvie, Astellas, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis; research funding from Jazz Pharmaceuticals and Bristol Myers Squibb; and travel support from Jazz Pharmaceuticals and Medac. KM declares being on an advisory role and paid for lectures for Bristol Myers Squibb; and travel support from Amgen, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. ML declares being in an advisory role for AbbVie, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Pfizer, Otsuka, and Syros; and research funding from Aristopharm, Cheplapharm, Janssen, and TEVA. KG declares being in an advisory role for Abbvie, BMS, and Servier. LF declares being in an advisory role for AbbVie, Amgen, Medac, Novartis, and Takeda; and research funding from Abbvie, Kite, and Speaker's Bureau for Celgene. EK reports speaker honoraria from Abbvie, Astellas, Celgene/BMS, Jazz, Novartis, and Servier; and being in an advisory or consultancy role for Abbvie, Astellas, Celgene/BMS, Jazz, and Servier. GW reports consultancy for Clinigen and Novartis; and honoraria from Novartis, Gilead, and Takeda. JS reports being in an advisory role and honoraria from AbbVie, Bayer, BMS, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi. RG reports being in an advisory role for Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda. BH reports being in an advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Novartis, and Sanofi. UMM reports being in an advisory role for BMS and Sanofi. SM-S reports being in an advisory role for Amgen, BMS/Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. SK-S reports consultancy for Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticlas, and Pfizer. LB reports being in an advisory role for Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Hexal, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Menarini, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Seattle Genetics; and research funding from Bayer and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. FT reports being in an advisory role for Abbvie, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Pfizer. MH reports being in an advisory role for Abbvie, BMS/Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Tolremo; honoraria from Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, and Novartis; and research funding to institution from Astellas, Bayer Pharma, BergenBio, Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. PP reports being in an advisory role for Abbvie, Agios, Astellas, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Otsuka Pharma, Pfizer, and Sunesis; speakers bureau for Abbvie, Agios, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Pfizer; and travel support for Abbvie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, and Takeda. VIG reports being in an advisory role for Abbvie and Pfizer; and speakers bureau for Pfizer and Janssen. RFS reports consulting for or an advisory board membership with Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, and Pfizer; research funding from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, PharmaMar, and Roche; and travel, accommodations, and expenses covered by Daiichi Sankyo. KD reports being in an advisory role for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Roche; and research funding from Agios, Astex, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, and Novartis. AG reports being in an advisory role for Celgene, JAZZ Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. All other authors declare no competing interests.