Culturable endophytic fungi community structure isolated from Codonopsis pilosula roots and effect of season and geographic location on their structures.
Codonopsis pilosula
Correlation analysis
Endophytic fungi diversity
Geographical location
Soil characterization
Temporal and spatial variation
Journal
BMC microbiology
ISSN: 1471-2180
Titre abrégé: BMC Microbiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100966981
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 05 2023
15 05 2023
Historique:
received:
08
05
2022
accepted:
05
07
2022
medline:
17
5
2023
pubmed:
16
5
2023
entrez:
15
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rhizosphere soil physicochemical, endophytic fungi have an important role in plant growth. A large number of endophytic fungi play an indispensable role in promoting plant growth and development, and they can provide protection for host plants by producing a variety of secondary metabolites to resist and inhibit plant pathogens. Due to the terrain of Gansu province is north-south and longitudinal, different climatic conditions, altitude, terrain and growth environment will affect the growth of Codonopsis pilosula, and the changes in these environmental factors directly affect the quality and yield of C. pilosula in different production areas. However, In C. pilosula, the connection between soil nutrients, spatiotemporal variation and the community structure of endophytic fungi isolated from C. pilosula roots has not been well studied. Seven hundred six strains of endophytic fungi were obtained using tissue isolation and the hyphaend-purification method from C. pilosula roots that picked at all seasons and six districts (Huichuan, HC; Longxi, LX; Zhangxian, ZX; Minxian, MX; Weiyuan, WY; and Lintao, LT) in Gansu Province, China. Fusarium sp. (205 strains, 29.04%), Aspergillus sp. (196 strains, 27.76%), Alternaria sp. (73 strains, 10.34%), Penicillium sp. (58 strains, 8.22%) and Plectosphaerella sp. (56 strains, 7.93%) were the dominant genus. The species composition differed from temporal and spatial distribution (Autumn and Winter were higher than Spring and Summer, MX and LT had the highest similarity, HC and LT had the lowest). physical and chemical of soil like Electroconductibility (EC), Total nitrogen (TN), Catalase (CAT), Urease (URE) and Sucrase (SUC) had significant effects on agronomic traits of C. pilosula (P < 0.05). AK (Spring and Summer), TN (Autumn) and altitude (Winter) are the main driving factors for the change of endophytic fungal community. Moreover, geographic location (such as altitude, latitude and longitude) also has effects on the diversity of endophytic fungi. These results suggested that soil nutrients and enzyme, seasonal variation and geographical locations have an impact on shaping the community structure of culturable endophytic fungi in the roots of C. pilosula and its root traits. This suggests that climatic conditions may play a driving role in the growth and development of C. pilosula.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Rhizosphere soil physicochemical, endophytic fungi have an important role in plant growth. A large number of endophytic fungi play an indispensable role in promoting plant growth and development, and they can provide protection for host plants by producing a variety of secondary metabolites to resist and inhibit plant pathogens. Due to the terrain of Gansu province is north-south and longitudinal, different climatic conditions, altitude, terrain and growth environment will affect the growth of Codonopsis pilosula, and the changes in these environmental factors directly affect the quality and yield of C. pilosula in different production areas. However, In C. pilosula, the connection between soil nutrients, spatiotemporal variation and the community structure of endophytic fungi isolated from C. pilosula roots has not been well studied.
RESULTS
Seven hundred six strains of endophytic fungi were obtained using tissue isolation and the hyphaend-purification method from C. pilosula roots that picked at all seasons and six districts (Huichuan, HC; Longxi, LX; Zhangxian, ZX; Minxian, MX; Weiyuan, WY; and Lintao, LT) in Gansu Province, China. Fusarium sp. (205 strains, 29.04%), Aspergillus sp. (196 strains, 27.76%), Alternaria sp. (73 strains, 10.34%), Penicillium sp. (58 strains, 8.22%) and Plectosphaerella sp. (56 strains, 7.93%) were the dominant genus. The species composition differed from temporal and spatial distribution (Autumn and Winter were higher than Spring and Summer, MX and LT had the highest similarity, HC and LT had the lowest). physical and chemical of soil like Electroconductibility (EC), Total nitrogen (TN), Catalase (CAT), Urease (URE) and Sucrase (SUC) had significant effects on agronomic traits of C. pilosula (P < 0.05). AK (Spring and Summer), TN (Autumn) and altitude (Winter) are the main driving factors for the change of endophytic fungal community. Moreover, geographic location (such as altitude, latitude and longitude) also has effects on the diversity of endophytic fungi.
CONCLUSIONS
These results suggested that soil nutrients and enzyme, seasonal variation and geographical locations have an impact on shaping the community structure of culturable endophytic fungi in the roots of C. pilosula and its root traits. This suggests that climatic conditions may play a driving role in the growth and development of C. pilosula.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37189022
doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-02848-3
pii: 10.1186/s12866-023-02848-3
pmc: PMC10184406
doi:
Substances chimiques
Soil
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
132Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Science. 2020 Feb 21;367(6480):
pubmed: 32079744
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021 Aug;165:19-35
pubmed: 34034158
ISME J. 2021 Dec;15(12):3468-3479
pubmed: 34108667
PLoS Pathog. 2013 Mar;9(3):e1003221
pubmed: 23516362
New Phytol. 2011 May;190(3):783-93
pubmed: 21244432
New Phytol. 2021 Mar;229(5):2886-2900
pubmed: 33225448
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 May 15;8:467
pubmed: 32500068
Biomolecules. 2021 Jan 22;11(2):
pubmed: 33499067
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Dec;96(6):1455-64
pubmed: 23108570
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Oct;105(19):7201-7213
pubmed: 34519854
Front Microbiol. 2016 Jun 09;7:906
pubmed: 27375610
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jan 17;10:3013
pubmed: 32010087
New Phytol. 2009 Oct;184(2):449-456
pubmed: 19703112
J Nat Med. 2014 Apr;68(2):326-39
pubmed: 24203345
Science. 2020 Apr 17;368(6488):270-274
pubmed: 32299947
Nat Commun. 2021 Sep 9;12(1):5350
pubmed: 34504089
Chin Med. 2018 Aug 14;13:41
pubmed: 30127840
Food Funct. 2020 Apr 30;11(4):3306-3315
pubmed: 32227014
Nat Commun. 2020 Jun 17;11(1):3072
pubmed: 32555185
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020 Mar;148:80-89
pubmed: 31951944
Microb Biotechnol. 2021 Jul;14(4):1730-1746
pubmed: 34081833
Sci Data. 2018 Nov 13;5:180242
pubmed: 30422127
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019 Apr;103(8):3327-3340
pubmed: 30847542
Nat Plants. 2021 Aug;7(8):1078-1092
pubmed: 34226690
ISME J. 2022 Feb;16(2):435-446
pubmed: 34413476
Chin Med. 2021 Nov 22;16(1):122
pubmed: 34809641
Annu Rev Genet. 2016 Nov 23;50:211-234
pubmed: 27648643
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020 Nov;18(11):607-621
pubmed: 32788714