Determinants of quality contraceptive counselling information among young women in Sierra Leone: insights from the 2019 Sierra Leone demographic health survey.
Counselling
Family planning
Quality
Sierra Leone
Young people
Journal
BMC women's health
ISSN: 1472-6874
Titre abrégé: BMC Womens Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088690
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 05 2023
15 05 2023
Historique:
received:
20
03
2022
accepted:
09
05
2023
medline:
17
5
2023
pubmed:
16
5
2023
entrez:
15
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The quality of contraceptive counseling information received by prospective clients of family planning services can greatly influence both the uptake and continued use of contraceptives. Therefore, an understanding of the level and determinants of quality contraception information among young women in Sierra Leon could inform family programs, with the aim of reducing the high unmet need in the country. We analyzed secondary data from the 2019 Sierra Leone Demographic Health Survey (SLDHS). Participants were young women aged 15-24 years, who were using a family planning method (n = 1,506). Good quality family planning counselling was defined a composite variable that included; a woman being told about side effects, how to deal with side effects, and the availability of other family planning methods/options. Logistic regression was performed using SPSS software version 25. Out of 1,506 young women, 955 (63.4%, 95% CI: 60.5-65.3) received good quality family planning counselling services. Of the 36.6% that received inadequate counselling, 17.1% received no counselling at all. Good quality family planning counselling services was positively associated with receiving family planning services from government health facilities (aOR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.83-3.41), having no major challenges with distance to access healthcare (aOR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.10-1.90), having visited a health facility (AOR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.45-2.58), and having been visited by a health field worker within the last 12 months (aOR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.24-2.26) while residing in the southern region ( aOR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22-0.69) and belonging to the richest wealth quintile (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.24-0.98) were associated with less odds of receiving good quality family planning counselling services. About 37% of the young women in Sierra Leone do not receive good quality family planning counselling services of which 17.1% received none. Based on the study's findings, it is important to emphasize the need to ensure that all young women have access to proper counselling services especially for those receiving these services from private health units, from the southern region and richest wealth quintile. Ensuring easier access through increasing affordable and friendly access points and strengthening field health workers' capacity in providing family planning services could also help improve access to good quality family planning services.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The quality of contraceptive counseling information received by prospective clients of family planning services can greatly influence both the uptake and continued use of contraceptives. Therefore, an understanding of the level and determinants of quality contraception information among young women in Sierra Leon could inform family programs, with the aim of reducing the high unmet need in the country.
METHODS
We analyzed secondary data from the 2019 Sierra Leone Demographic Health Survey (SLDHS). Participants were young women aged 15-24 years, who were using a family planning method (n = 1,506). Good quality family planning counselling was defined a composite variable that included; a woman being told about side effects, how to deal with side effects, and the availability of other family planning methods/options. Logistic regression was performed using SPSS software version 25.
RESULTS
Out of 1,506 young women, 955 (63.4%, 95% CI: 60.5-65.3) received good quality family planning counselling services. Of the 36.6% that received inadequate counselling, 17.1% received no counselling at all. Good quality family planning counselling services was positively associated with receiving family planning services from government health facilities (aOR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.83-3.41), having no major challenges with distance to access healthcare (aOR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.10-1.90), having visited a health facility (AOR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.45-2.58), and having been visited by a health field worker within the last 12 months (aOR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.24-2.26) while residing in the southern region ( aOR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22-0.69) and belonging to the richest wealth quintile (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.24-0.98) were associated with less odds of receiving good quality family planning counselling services.
CONCLUSION
About 37% of the young women in Sierra Leone do not receive good quality family planning counselling services of which 17.1% received none. Based on the study's findings, it is important to emphasize the need to ensure that all young women have access to proper counselling services especially for those receiving these services from private health units, from the southern region and richest wealth quintile. Ensuring easier access through increasing affordable and friendly access points and strengthening field health workers' capacity in providing family planning services could also help improve access to good quality family planning services.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37189150
doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02419-8
pii: 10.1186/s12905-023-02419-8
pmc: PMC10186652
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contraceptive Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
266Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Sep 16;22(1):376
pubmed: 36114503
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020 Oct 2;8(3):442-454
pubmed: 33008857
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 3;19(1):352
pubmed: 31159785
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 28;9(8):e105936
pubmed: 25166504
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021 Jan;47(1):6-8
pubmed: 32788181
Matern Child Nutr. 2020 Oct;16(4):e13041
pubmed: 32720469
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun 22;6:79
pubmed: 16792810
Arch Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;80(1):208
pubmed: 36114556
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Mar 1;32(2):151-162
pubmed: 28207047
Gates Open Res. 2019 May 2;3:1453
pubmed: 32140663
PLoS One. 2021 May 4;16(5):e0239565
pubmed: 33945555
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 3;11(11):e0165627
pubmed: 27812124
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Feb;31(1):1-9
pubmed: 25797469
Reprod Health. 2019 Jul 10;16(1):101
pubmed: 31291958
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231630
pubmed: 32298333
Cult Health Sex. 2021 Jan;23(1):19-36
pubmed: 31702445
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Feb 10;21(1):61
pubmed: 33568124
Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Aug 13;2:656616
pubmed: 34816214
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0256295
pubmed: 34506509
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Dec 12;18(1):201
pubmed: 30541528
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 20;13(2):e0188280
pubmed: 29462152
Reprod Health. 2021 Dec 20;18(1):253
pubmed: 34930345
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Apr;34(2):701-713
pubmed: 30680789
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2017 Nov;17(4):e436-e443
pubmed: 29372086
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 26;16:636
pubmed: 27457223
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 12;17(1):346
pubmed: 28499384
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Feb 18;20(1):29
pubmed: 32070339
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 10;15(2):e0228714
pubmed: 32040485
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;22(1):102
pubmed: 35031038
Int J Reprod Med. 2020 Sep 28;2020:8016483
pubmed: 33062664
J Glob Health. 2019 Jun;9(1):010307
pubmed: 31217949
Womens Health (Lond). 2017 Dec;13(3):43-57
pubmed: 28849728
Reprod Health. 2022 Feb 7;19(1):37
pubmed: 35130932
Reprod Health. 2021 Nov 27;18(1):237
pubmed: 34838040
Hum Resour Health. 2016 Feb 01;14:3
pubmed: 26833070
Health Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 28;4(2):e297
pubmed: 34195385
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Dec 28;4(4):594-609
pubmed: 28031299
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 20;15:335
pubmed: 26290181
Reprod Health. 2022 Jan 21;19(1):18
pubmed: 35062968
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(1):1818376
pubmed: 33073741