Association between Eruption Sequence of Posterior Teeth, Dental Crowding, Arch Dimensions, Incisor Inclination, and Skeletal Growth Pattern.
arch dimensions
dental crowding
eruption sequence
incisor inclination
skeletal growth pattern
Journal
Children (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2227-9067
Titre abrégé: Children (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648936
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Apr 2023
01 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
14
02
2023
revised:
22
03
2023
accepted:
30
03
2023
medline:
16
5
2023
pubmed:
16
5
2023
entrez:
16
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We conducted research to investigate the effects of the eruption sequence of posterior teeth, arch dimensions, and incisor inclination on dental crowding. A cross-sectional analytic study was performed on 100 patients (54 boys and 46 girls; mean ages: 11.69 and 11.16 years, respectively). Seq1 (canine-3-/second premolar-5-) or Seq2 (5/3) eruption sequences were recorded in maxilla, and Seq3 (canine-3-/first premolar-4-) or Seq4 (4/3) eruption sequences in mandible; tooth size, available space, tooth size-arch length discrepancy (TS-ALD), arch lengths, incisor inclination and distance, and skeletal relationship were noted. The most common eruption sequences in the maxilla and mandible were Seq1 (50.6%), and Seq3 (52.1%), respectively. In the maxilla, posterior tooth sizes were larger in crowded cases. In the mandible, anterior and posterior tooth sizes were larger in crowded patients. No relationship between incisor variables and the maxillo-mandibular relationship and dental crowding was found. A negative correlation between inferior TS-ALD and the mandibular plane was found. Seq1 and Seq 2 in the maxilla and Seq 3 and Seq 4 in the mandible were equally prevalent. An eruption sequence of 3-5 in the maxilla and 3-4 in the mandible is more likely to cause crowding.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
We conducted research to investigate the effects of the eruption sequence of posterior teeth, arch dimensions, and incisor inclination on dental crowding.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
METHODS
A cross-sectional analytic study was performed on 100 patients (54 boys and 46 girls; mean ages: 11.69 and 11.16 years, respectively). Seq1 (canine-3-/second premolar-5-) or Seq2 (5/3) eruption sequences were recorded in maxilla, and Seq3 (canine-3-/first premolar-4-) or Seq4 (4/3) eruption sequences in mandible; tooth size, available space, tooth size-arch length discrepancy (TS-ALD), arch lengths, incisor inclination and distance, and skeletal relationship were noted.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The most common eruption sequences in the maxilla and mandible were Seq1 (50.6%), and Seq3 (52.1%), respectively. In the maxilla, posterior tooth sizes were larger in crowded cases. In the mandible, anterior and posterior tooth sizes were larger in crowded patients. No relationship between incisor variables and the maxillo-mandibular relationship and dental crowding was found. A negative correlation between inferior TS-ALD and the mandibular plane was found.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Seq1 and Seq 2 in the maxilla and Seq 3 and Seq 4 in the mandible were equally prevalent. An eruption sequence of 3-5 in the maxilla and 3-4 in the mandible is more likely to cause crowding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37189923
pii: children10040674
doi: 10.3390/children10040674
pmc: PMC10137228
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Am Dent Assoc. 1978 Aug;97(2):209-14
pubmed: 277593
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2013 Winter;6(1):14-7
pubmed: 24834239
Eur J Orthod. 1986 Feb;8(1):43-9
pubmed: 3456900
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1984 Feb;12(1):55-8
pubmed: 6607817
F1000Res. 2014 Jun 06;3:122
pubmed: 25110582
Saudi Dent J. 2010 Apr;22(2):69-75
pubmed: 23960478
J Physiol Anthropol. 2007 May;26(3):387-402
pubmed: 17641459
Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Nov-Dec;23(6):40.e1-40.e10
pubmed: 30672991
Angle Orthod. 2013 Jan;83(1):10-5
pubmed: 22799527
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Jan;153(1):36-45
pubmed: 29287646
Angle Orthod. 2011 Mar;81(2):217-21
pubmed: 21208072
Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Mar-Apr;22(2):87-94
pubmed: 28658360
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006 Jun;24(2):90-6
pubmed: 16823234
PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296
pubmed: 17941714
Am J Orthod. 1982 Nov;82(5):418-25
pubmed: 6961812
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Aug;128(2):220-5
pubmed: 16102408
Angle Orthod. 2017 Jul;87(4):576-582
pubmed: 28318312
Br Dent J. 1967 Jul 18;123(2):98-102
pubmed: 6043424
Angle Orthod. 2020 Mar;90(2):216-223
pubmed: 31549856
Angle Orthod. 2004 Dec;74(6):759-64
pubmed: 15673137
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 May;153(5):701-707
pubmed: 29706218
Am J Orthod. 1985 Jul;88(1):47-63
pubmed: 3860012
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Jul-Aug;13(4):368-380
pubmed: 33149410
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Dec;108(6):607-13
pubmed: 7503038
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2020 Jun;21(2):115-122
pubmed: 32567942
Br J Orthod. 1996 Aug;23(3):249-54
pubmed: 8894158
Angle Orthod. 2018 Mar;88(2):195-201
pubmed: 29215300