Can expiratory or inspiratory contrast-enhanced computed tomography be more efficient for fast-track cannulation of the right adrenal vein in adrenal venous sampling?
Adrenal
CT
aldosteronism
contrast
venography
Journal
Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)
ISSN: 1305-3612
Titre abrégé: Diagn Interv Radiol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101241152
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 07 2023
20 07 2023
Historique:
medline:
21
7
2023
pubmed:
16
5
2023
entrez:
16
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study compares the usefulness of expiratory arterial phase (EAP)-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) (CECT) with that of inspiratory arterial phase (IAP)-CECT in adrenal venous sampling (AVS). Sixty-four patients who underwent AVS and CECT at the authors' hospital between April 2013 and June 2019 were included in this study. The patients were classified into the following two groups: EAP (32 patients) and IAP (32 patients) groups. The single arterial phase images were obtained at 40 seconds in the IAP group. The double arterial phase images were obtained at 40 seconds in the early arterial phase and 55 seconds in the late arterial phase in the EAP group. The authors then compared the right adrenal vein (RAV) visualization rate on the CECT, the difference between the CECT images and adrenal venograms in the localization of the RAV orifice, the cannulation time to the RAV, and the volume of contrast agent administered intraoperatively between the two groups. The rates of the RAV visualization in the EAP group were 84.4% in the early arterial phase, 93.8% in the late arterial phase, and 100% in the combined early and late arterial phases. The rate of the RAV visualization in the IAP group was 96.9%. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the rate of the RAV visualization. However, there was a small difference in the location of the RAV orifice between the CECT images and adrenal venograms in the EAP group as compared with the IAP group (P < 0.001). The median time to the RAV catheterization was significantly shorter in the EAP group (27.5 minutes) than in the IAP group (35.5 minutes; The EAP-CECT is more useful for increasing the speed of the RAV cannulation due to the small difference in the localization of the RAV orifice compared to IAP-CECT. However, since EAP-CECT has double contrast arterial phases and increased radiation exposure compared to IAP-CECT, only the late arterial phase may be acceptable to reduce radiation exposure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37191468
doi: 10.4274/dir.2023.222045
pmc: PMC10679638
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
640-646Références
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015 Jan-Feb;21(1):60-6
pubmed: 25430527
Radiology. 2016 Jan;278(1):265-74
pubmed: 26147784
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 May;34(3):101400
pubmed: 32115358
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 May;101(5):1889-916
pubmed: 26934393
Radiology. 1998 Jun;207(3):657-62
pubmed: 9609887
Eur Radiol. 2016 Mar;26(3):622-30
pubmed: 26108640
Radiology. 1998 Jun;207(3):647-55
pubmed: 9609886
Clin Radiol. 2022 Aug;77(8):e652-e659
pubmed: 35710528
Hypertension. 2019 Oct;74(4):800-808
pubmed: 31476901
Ann Med. 2013 Jun;45(4):375-83
pubmed: 23701121
Eur Radiol. 2016 Jul;26(7):2073-7
pubmed: 26494644
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Dec;98(12):4826-33
pubmed: 24057288
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Nov;96:104-108
pubmed: 29103467
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug;191(2):402-8
pubmed: 18647909
Hypertension. 2017 Mar;69(3):428-434
pubmed: 28137990
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021 Nov;27(6):754-761
pubmed: 34792030
Hypertension. 2014 Jan;63(1):151-60
pubmed: 24218436
Jpn J Radiol. 2016 Sep;34(9):611-9
pubmed: 27384332
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Mar;34(2):101365
pubmed: 31837980
Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:597247
pubmed: 26074961
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Aug;81(8):1742-50
pubmed: 21602008
Hypertension. 2018 Mar;71(3):530-537
pubmed: 29358460