Review of welding fume emission factor development.


Journal

Annals of work exposures and health
ISSN: 2398-7316
Titre abrégé: Ann Work Expo Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101698454

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 07 2023
Historique:
received: 21 12 2022
accepted: 18 04 2023
medline: 10 7 2023
pubmed: 16 5 2023
entrez: 16 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The fumes created from welding activities present a unique occupational hazard. Due to the complex processes which govern fume formation, the characterization of welding fumes is difficult. Emission factors (EFs) are one method to characterize fume formation from different processes and scenarios. This paper reviews the development of EFs and similar metrics both historic research which contributed to the US EPAs AP-42 summary of welding emission factors released in 1995, and more recent research initiatives. Through a critical analysis of what research has been done in this area and the strength of the emission factors developed, this paper proposes a set of recommendations for future research. Research on emission factors for gas metal arc welding (GMAW) is the most complete amongst the different types of electric arc welding. Despite it being generally known that flux core arc welding (FCAW) creates significant fume emissions compared to some of the other processes few studies have looked at FCAW since the AP-42. Shielded metal arc welding is also under-researched particularly in terms of metal-specific emission factors. The influence of different welding activity parameters such as welding location, speed or current is well defined for GMAW but requires more attention for other welding processes. Further effort towards compiling and comparing available emission factor data of quality, evaluating the available data statistically and organizing this data in a practically useful way is required. The availability of reliable emission factors will allow the development or improvement of exposure modelling tools that would be very useful for exposure assessment when monitoring is not practical.s.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37191647
pii: 7165132
doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxad024
doi:

Substances chimiques

Air Pollutants, Occupational 0
Metals 0
Gases 0

Types de publication

Review Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

675-693

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.

Auteurs

Emily Quecke (E)

Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6R 2W2, Canada.

Bernadette Quemerais (B)

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6R 2R3, Canada.

Zaher Hashisho (Z)

Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6R 2W2, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH