Deep learning-based cerebral aneurysm segmentation and morphological analysis with three-dimensional rotational angiography.

aneurysm angiography intervention

Journal

Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 May 2023
Historique:
received: 16 02 2023
accepted: 14 04 2023
medline: 17 5 2023
pubmed: 17 5 2023
entrez: 16 5 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The morphological assessment of cerebral aneurysms based on cerebral angiography is an essential step when planning strategy and device selection in endovascular treatment, but manual evaluation by human raters only has moderate interrater/intrarater reliability. We collected data for 889 cerebral angiograms from consecutive patients with suspected cerebral aneurysms at our institution from January 2017 to October 2021. The automatic morphological analysis model was developed on the derivation cohort dataset consisting of 388 scans with 437 aneurysms, and the performance of the model was tested on the validation cohort dataset consisting of 96 scans with 124 aneurysms. Five clinically important parameters were automatically calculated by the model: aneurysm volume, maximum aneurysm size, neck size, aneurysm height, and aspect ratio. On the validation cohort dataset the average aneurysm size was 7.9±4.6 mm. The proposed model displayed high segmentation accuracy with a mean Dice similarity index of 0.87 (median 0.93). All the morphological parameters were significantly correlated with the reference standard (all P<0.0001; Pearson correlation analysis). The difference in the maximum aneurysm size between the model prediction and reference standard was 0.5±0.7 mm (mean±SD). The difference in neck size between the model prediction and reference standard was 0.8±1.7 mm (mean±SD). The automatic aneurysm analysis model based on angiography data exhibited high accuracy for evaluating the morphological characteristics of cerebral aneurysms.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The morphological assessment of cerebral aneurysms based on cerebral angiography is an essential step when planning strategy and device selection in endovascular treatment, but manual evaluation by human raters only has moderate interrater/intrarater reliability.
METHODS METHODS
We collected data for 889 cerebral angiograms from consecutive patients with suspected cerebral aneurysms at our institution from January 2017 to October 2021. The automatic morphological analysis model was developed on the derivation cohort dataset consisting of 388 scans with 437 aneurysms, and the performance of the model was tested on the validation cohort dataset consisting of 96 scans with 124 aneurysms. Five clinically important parameters were automatically calculated by the model: aneurysm volume, maximum aneurysm size, neck size, aneurysm height, and aspect ratio.
RESULTS RESULTS
On the validation cohort dataset the average aneurysm size was 7.9±4.6 mm. The proposed model displayed high segmentation accuracy with a mean Dice similarity index of 0.87 (median 0.93). All the morphological parameters were significantly correlated with the reference standard (all P<0.0001; Pearson correlation analysis). The difference in the maximum aneurysm size between the model prediction and reference standard was 0.5±0.7 mm (mean±SD). The difference in neck size between the model prediction and reference standard was 0.8±1.7 mm (mean±SD).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The automatic aneurysm analysis model based on angiography data exhibited high accuracy for evaluating the morphological characteristics of cerebral aneurysms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37192786
pii: jnis-2023-020192
doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020192
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Hidehisa Nishi (H)

Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada venturahighway83@gmail.com.
RADIS Lab, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Nicole M Cancelliere (NM)

Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
RADIS Lab, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Ariana Rustici (A)

RADIS Lab, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Guillaume Charbonnier (G)

RADIS Lab, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Vanessa Chan (V)

RADIS Lab, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Julian Spears (J)

Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Thomas R Marotta (TR)

Department of Medical Imaging, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Vitor Mendes Pereira (V)

Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
RADIS Lab, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Classifications MeSH