What predicts individual response to language treatment in bilingual children with developmental language disorder?
Journal
Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups
ISSN: 2381-4764
Titre abrégé: Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101682248
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
01
04
2024
medline:
17
5
2023
pubmed:
17
5
2023
entrez:
16
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
For bilingual children with developmental language disorder (DLD), language treatment response is the degree to which an individual child progresses in both of their languages. Understanding what predicts language treatment response for an individual child can help clinicians plan treatment more effectively. This study is a retrospective analysis of data from Ebert et al. (2014). Participants included 32 school-age Spanish-English bilingual children with DLD who completed an intensive language treatment program. Gains in Spanish and English were measured using raw test scores in each language. Predictors of language gains include language, cognitive, and demographic variables. To examine which predictors were significant, we calculated partial correlations between the potential predictors and the posttreatment language test scores, controlling for the effects of pretreatment test scores. In Spanish, several predictors correlated with the outcome measures. After controlling for pretreatment scores, English grammaticality, female sex, processing speed, age, and fluid reasoning were related to Spanish posttreatment scores. In English, correlations with individual predictors were minimal. After controlling for pretreatment scores, only one variable was associated with one English posttreatment score: English grammaticality. The original study reported limited gains in Spanish compared to robust gains in English (Ebert et al., 2014). Treatment response in Spanish is more variable given the lack of environmental support for Spanish in the US. As a result, individual factors (including nonverbal cognition, pretreatment language levels, and demographic variables) influence treatment gains in Spanish. In contrast, strong environmental support for English supports a more consistent treatment response, with a smaller role for individual factors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37193089
doi: 10.1044/2022_persp-22-00170
pmc: PMC10171084
mid: NIHMS1896151
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
226-233Subventions
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC019613
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R21 DC010868
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2019 Oct 10;50(4):518-539
pubmed: 31600474
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1166-1186
pubmed: 28726177
Appl Psycholinguist. 2013 Nov 1;34(6):1219-1243
pubmed: 24489415
J Child Lang. 2008 Feb;35(1):25-53
pubmed: 18300428
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;58(10):1068-1080
pubmed: 28369935
Biling (Camb Engl). 2022 Mar;25(2):296-306
pubmed: 36051378
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Apr;50(2):408-28
pubmed: 17463238
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 May-Jun;48(3):265-82
pubmed: 23650884
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Nov 12;29(4):2082-2096
pubmed: 32997549
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Apr 7;51(2):282-297
pubmed: 32255748
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Dec;47(6):1363-79
pubmed: 15842016
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Jun;21(3):240-251
pubmed: 30712388
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Feb;57(1):172-86
pubmed: 23900032
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 May 22;63(5):1479-1493
pubmed: 32379528
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Oct;54(5):1372-84
pubmed: 21646419
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2017 Jan 01;48(1):42-55
pubmed: 28055056
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 May;24(2):237-55
pubmed: 25654306
Child Dev. 2013 Mar-Apr;84(2):630-46
pubmed: 23075314
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Feb;21(1):64-77
pubmed: 22230174
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009 Nov-Dec;44(6):826-46
pubmed: 19107656
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2015 Oct;46(4):312-24
pubmed: 26110982
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2017 Jan 01;48(1):16-30
pubmed: 28036410