Two-year imaging outcomes from a phase 3 randomized trial of secukinumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.
Axial spondyloarthritis
Imaging
Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis
Nr-axSpA
Radiograph
Secukinumab
X-ray
Journal
Arthritis research & therapy
ISSN: 1478-6362
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101154438
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 05 2023
16 05 2023
Historique:
received:
30
12
2022
accepted:
13
04
2023
medline:
18
5
2023
pubmed:
17
5
2023
entrez:
16
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Radiographic progression and course of inflammation over 2 years in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) from the phase 3, randomized, PREVENT study are reported here. In the PREVENT study, adult patients fulfilling the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for nr-axSpA with elevated CRP and/or MRI inflammation received secukinumab 150 mg or placebo. All patients received open-label secukinumab from week 52 onward. Sacroiliac (SI) joint and spinal radiographs were scored using the modified New York (mNY) grading (total sacroiliitis score; range, 0-8) and modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS; range, 0-72), respectively. SI joint bone marrow edema (BME) was assessed using the Berlin Active Inflammatory Lesions Scoring (0-24) and spinal MRI using the Berlin modification of the AS spine MRI (ASspiMRI) scoring (0-69). Overall, 78.9% (438/555) of patients completed week 104 of the study. Over 2 years, minimal changes were observed in total radiographic SI joint scores (mean [SD] change, - 0.04 [0.49] and 0.04 [0.36]) and mSASSS scores (0.04 [0.47] and 0.07 [0.36]) in the secukinumab and placebo-secukinumab groups. Most of the patients showed no structural progression (increase ≤ smallest detectable change) in SI joint score (87.7% and 85.6%) and mSASSS score (97.5% and 97.1%) in the secukinumab and placebo-secukinumab groups. Only 3.3% (n = 7) and 2.9% (n = 3) of patients in the secukinumab and placebo-secukinumab groups, respectively, who were mNY-negative at baseline were scored as mNY-positive at week 104. Overall, 1.7% and 3.4% of patients with no syndesmophytes at baseline in the secukinumab and placebo-secukinumab group, respectively, developed ≥ 1 new syndesmophyte over 2 years. Reduction in SI joint BME observed at week 16 with secukinumab (mean [SD], - 1.23 [2.81] vs - 0.37 [1.90] with placebo) was sustained through week 104 (- 1.73 [3.49]). Spinal inflammation on MRI was low at baseline (mean score, 0.82 and 1.07 in the secukinumab and placebo groups, respectively) and remained low (mean score, 0.56 at week 104). Structural damage was low at baseline and most patients showed no radiographic progression in SI joints and spine over 2 years in the secukinumab and placebo-secukinumab groups. Secukinumab reduced SI joint inflammation, which was sustained over 2 years. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02696031.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Radiographic progression and course of inflammation over 2 years in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) from the phase 3, randomized, PREVENT study are reported here.
METHODS
In the PREVENT study, adult patients fulfilling the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for nr-axSpA with elevated CRP and/or MRI inflammation received secukinumab 150 mg or placebo. All patients received open-label secukinumab from week 52 onward. Sacroiliac (SI) joint and spinal radiographs were scored using the modified New York (mNY) grading (total sacroiliitis score; range, 0-8) and modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS; range, 0-72), respectively. SI joint bone marrow edema (BME) was assessed using the Berlin Active Inflammatory Lesions Scoring (0-24) and spinal MRI using the Berlin modification of the AS spine MRI (ASspiMRI) scoring (0-69).
RESULTS
Overall, 78.9% (438/555) of patients completed week 104 of the study. Over 2 years, minimal changes were observed in total radiographic SI joint scores (mean [SD] change, - 0.04 [0.49] and 0.04 [0.36]) and mSASSS scores (0.04 [0.47] and 0.07 [0.36]) in the secukinumab and placebo-secukinumab groups. Most of the patients showed no structural progression (increase ≤ smallest detectable change) in SI joint score (87.7% and 85.6%) and mSASSS score (97.5% and 97.1%) in the secukinumab and placebo-secukinumab groups. Only 3.3% (n = 7) and 2.9% (n = 3) of patients in the secukinumab and placebo-secukinumab groups, respectively, who were mNY-negative at baseline were scored as mNY-positive at week 104. Overall, 1.7% and 3.4% of patients with no syndesmophytes at baseline in the secukinumab and placebo-secukinumab group, respectively, developed ≥ 1 new syndesmophyte over 2 years. Reduction in SI joint BME observed at week 16 with secukinumab (mean [SD], - 1.23 [2.81] vs - 0.37 [1.90] with placebo) was sustained through week 104 (- 1.73 [3.49]). Spinal inflammation on MRI was low at baseline (mean score, 0.82 and 1.07 in the secukinumab and placebo groups, respectively) and remained low (mean score, 0.56 at week 104).
CONCLUSION
Structural damage was low at baseline and most patients showed no radiographic progression in SI joints and spine over 2 years in the secukinumab and placebo-secukinumab groups. Secukinumab reduced SI joint inflammation, which was sustained over 2 years.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02696031.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37194094
doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03051-5
pii: 10.1186/s13075-023-03051-5
pmc: PMC10186767
doi:
Substances chimiques
secukinumab
DLG4EML025
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02696031']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
80Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Rheumatol Ther. 2019 Jun;6(2):165-177
pubmed: 30788779
J Rheumatol. 2017 Jan;44(1):1-3
pubmed: 28042123
Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Jun;62(6):519-25
pubmed: 12759287
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):1067-70
pubmed: 23606704
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Jan 29;23(1):43
pubmed: 33514428
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Sep 1;58(9):1556-1564
pubmed: 30830164
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Nov;76(11):1823-1828
pubmed: 28684556
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Apr;71(4):518-23
pubmed: 21989544
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Dec;71(12):1678-1684
pubmed: 30354022
Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 Dec 22;19(1):285
pubmed: 29273067
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Nov;78(11):1545-1549
pubmed: 31362994
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Jan;73(1):110-120
pubmed: 32770640
Joint Bone Spine. 2020 Mar;87(2):131-136
pubmed: 31067506
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;71(10):1599-1613
pubmed: 31436036
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 May;64(5):1388-98
pubmed: 22127957
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 24;373(26):2534-48
pubmed: 26699169
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Mar 1;58(3):388-400
pubmed: 29860356
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Aug;70(8):1369-74
pubmed: 21622969
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):1107-13
pubmed: 23644549
RMD Open. 2020 Sep;6(2):
pubmed: 32907882
Lancet. 2017 Jul 1;390(10089):73-84
pubmed: 28110981
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 20;15(3):e0230268
pubmed: 32196530
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Apr;44(5):556-562
pubmed: 25532945
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):777-83
pubmed: 19297344
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018 Jun;14(6):525-533
pubmed: 29774755
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;27(4):326-32
pubmed: 26002023
Arthritis Rheum. 1984 Apr;27(4):361-8
pubmed: 6231933
Mod Rheumatol. 2021 Mar;31(2):277-282
pubmed: 32996809
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 May;75(5):791-4
pubmed: 26768406
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020 Feb;2(2):119-127
pubmed: 31957970
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Sep;66(9):2403-11
pubmed: 24909765
Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Aug 3;20(1):162
pubmed: 30075808
Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Jan;81(1):11-14
pubmed: 34711586
J Rheumatol. 2007 Apr;34(4):862-70
pubmed: 17407241
RMD Open. 2019 Sep 3;5(2):e001005
pubmed: 31565244
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 May 5;61(5):2063-2071
pubmed: 34352069
J Rheumatol. 2017 Jan;44(1):70-77
pubmed: 27744397
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Sep;64(9):1415-22
pubmed: 22505331
RMD Open. 2019 Feb 26;5(1):e000848
pubmed: 30886736
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 May;77(5):699-705
pubmed: 29343510
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jan;64(1):127-9
pubmed: 15051621