Interreader reliability assessment of hallux valgus evaluation on dorsoplantar weightbearing radiographs from a prospective multi-center trial and correlation with patient-reported outcome measures.
Bunion
Hallux valgus
Hallux valgus angle
Intermetatarsal angle
Interreader analysis
Journal
Skeletal radiology
ISSN: 1432-2161
Titre abrégé: Skeletal Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7701953
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
04
04
2023
accepted:
09
05
2023
revised:
09
05
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
18
5
2023
entrez:
18
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine inter-reader reliability (IRR) of hallux valgus (HV) related parameters, i.e. intermetatarsal angle (IMA), hallux valgus angle (HVA), lateral round sign of the first metatarsal, tibial sesamoid position (TSP), metatarsus adductus angle (MAA), transverse osseous foot width, 1 A prospective single-arm Level 3 multicenter clinical trial in which standardized radiographs and PROMs were collected at the time of the initial patient visit for pre-operative assessment. Two musculoskeletal radiologists performed measurements blinded to each other's reads and clinical information. Intraclass coefficient and kappa were obtained for inter-reader analysis. A partial spearman rank order was used to correlate the measurements with PROMs. The final cohort size of 183 patients had mean age of 40.77 years, mean body mass index was 26.11 kg/m Good to excellent inter-reader reliability was observed for the most often used measurements for HV assessment without major trends in their correlations with PROMs. Lateral round sign is not a reliable finding in HV deformity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37199757
doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04365-w
pii: 10.1007/s00256-023-04365-w
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2419-2425Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Skeletal Society (ISS).
Références
Wülker N, Mittag F. The treatment of hallux valgus. Dtsch Aerzteblatt Int. 2012;109:857–67.
Kim Y, Kim JS, Young KW, Reza N, Cho HK, Lee SY. A new measure of tibial sesamoid position in hallux valgus in relation to the coronal rotation of the first metatarsal in CT scans. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36:944–52.
doi: 10.1177/1071100715576994
pubmed: 25813535
Nix S, Smith M, Vicenzino B. Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3:1–9.
doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-21
Rosen J, Grady J. Neuritic bunion syndrome. J Am Pod Med Assoc. 1986;76:641–4.
doi: 10.7547/87507315-76-11-641
Haas M. Radiographic and biomechanical consideration of bunion surgery. In: Gerbert J, editor. Textbook of Bunion Surgery. Futura Publishing; 1981.
Heineman N, Xi Y, Zhang L, Dessouky R, Hummel J, Skweres J, et al. Hallux valgus evaluation on MRI: can measurements validated on radiographs be used? J Foot Ankle Surg [Internet]. 2018;57:305–8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.10.009 . Elsevier Inc.
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.10.009
pubmed: 29331288
Heineman N, Liu G, Pacicco T, Dessouky R, Wukich D, Chhabra A. Clinical and imaging assessment and treatment of hallux valgus. Acta radiol. 2019;61:56–66.
doi: 10.1177/0284185119847675
pubmed: 31084192
Lamm BM, Stasko PA, Gesheff MG, Bhave A. Normal foot and ankle radiographic angles, measurements, and reference points. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55:991–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2016.05.005 .
Heineman N, Chhabra A, Zhang L, Dessouky R, Wukich D. Point vs. traditional method evaluation of hallux valgus: interreader reliability and intermethod performance using X-ray and MRI. Skeletal Radiol. 2019;48:251–7.
doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-3022-5
pubmed: 30003279
Liu GT, Chhabra A, Dayton MJ, Dayton PD, Duke WJ, Farber DC, et al. One- and two-year analysis of a five-year prospective multicenter study assessing radiographic and patient-reported outcomes following triplanar first tarsometatarsal arthrodesis with early weightbearing for symptomatic hallux valgus. J Foot Ankle Surg [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2022;000:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2022.04.008 .
Srivastava S, Chockalingam N, El Fakhri T. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: Comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements. J Foot Ankle Surg [Internet]. 2010;49:523–8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2010.07.012 . Elsevier Ltd
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.07.012
pubmed: 20833569
D’Arcangelo PR, Landorf KB, Munteanu SE, Zammit GV, Menz HB. Radiographic correlates of hallux valgus severity in older people. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3:1–9.
Lee KM, Ahn S, Chung CY, Sung KH, Park MS. Reliability and relationship of radiographic measurements in hallux valgus foot and ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:2613–21.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2368-6
pubmed: 22544667
pmcid: 3830090
Matthews M, Klein E, Youssef A, Weil L, Sorensen M, Weil LS, et al. Correlation of radiographic measurements with patient-centered outcomes in hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39:1416–22.
doi: 10.1177/1071100718790255
pubmed: 30136598
Sharfman ZT, Safran N, Amar E, Varshneya K, Safran MR, Rath E. Age-adjusted normative values for hip patient-reported outcome measures. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(1):79–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211056666 .
doi: 10.1177/03635465211056666
pubmed: 34807748