Understanding common population markers for SARS-CoV-2 RNA normalization in wastewater - A review.


Journal

Chemosphere
ISSN: 1879-1298
Titre abrégé: Chemosphere
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0320657

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 14 10 2022
revised: 14 02 2023
accepted: 11 04 2023
medline: 5 6 2023
pubmed: 19 5 2023
entrez: 18 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Wastewater monitoring and epidemiology have seen renewed interest during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, there is an increasing need to normalize wastewater-derived viral loads in local populations. Chemical tracers, both exogenous and endogenous compounds, have proven to be more stable and reliable for normalization than biological indicators. However, differing instrumentation and extraction methods can make it difficult to compare results. This review examines current extraction and quantification methods for ten common population indicators: creatinine, coprostanol, nicotine, cotinine, sucralose, acesulfame, androstenedione 5-hydroindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), caffeine, and 1,7-dimethyluric acid. Some wastewater parameters such as ammonia, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and daily flowrate were also evaluated. The analytical methods included direct injection, dilute and shoot, liquid/liquid, and solid phase extraction (SPE). Creatine, acesulfame, nicotine, 5-HIAA and androstenedione have been analysed by direct injection into LC-MS; however, most authors prefer to include SPE steps to avoid matrix effects. Both LC-MS and GC-MS have been successfully used to quantify coprostanol in wastewater, and the other selected indicators have been quantified successfully with LC-MS. Acidification to stabilize the sample before freezing to maintain the integrity of samples has been reported to be beneficial. However, there are arguments both for and against working at acidic pHs. Wastewater parameters mentioned earlier are quick and easy to quantify, but the data does not always represent the human population effectively. A preference for population indicators originating solely from humans is apparent. This review summarises methods employed for chemical indicators in wastewater, provides a basis for choosing an appropriate extraction and analysis method, and highlights the utility of accurate chemical tracer data for wastewater-based epidemiology.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37201600
pii: S0045-6535(23)00949-9
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138682
pmc: PMC10186006
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Wastewater 0
acetosulfame MA3UYZ6K1H
Nicotine 6M3C89ZY6R
RNA, Viral 0
Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid 54-16-0
Androstenedione 409J2J96VR
Cholestanol 8M308U816E
Water Pollutants, Chemical 0
Indicators and Reagents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

138682

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Femi F Oloye (FF)

Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. Electronic address: pen2crown@yahoo.com.

Yuwei Xie (Y)

Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Jonathan K Challis (JK)

Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Oluwabunmi P Femi-Oloye (OP)

Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Markus Brinkmann (M)

Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada; Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada; School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Kerry N McPhedran (KN)

School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada; Department of Civil, Geological and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Paul D Jones (PD)

Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada; Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada; School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Mark R Servos (MR)

Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

John P Giesy (JP)

Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada; Department of Environmental Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA; Department of Integrative Biology and Center for Integrative Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. Electronic address: john.giesy@usask.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH