Understanding common population markers for SARS-CoV-2 RNA normalization in wastewater - A review.
Chemical indicator
Extraction
GC-MS
LC-MS
Population biomarker
Wastewater
Wastewater parameter
Journal
Chemosphere
ISSN: 1879-1298
Titre abrégé: Chemosphere
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0320657
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
14
10
2022
revised:
14
02
2023
accepted:
11
04
2023
medline:
5
6
2023
pubmed:
19
5
2023
entrez:
18
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Wastewater monitoring and epidemiology have seen renewed interest during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, there is an increasing need to normalize wastewater-derived viral loads in local populations. Chemical tracers, both exogenous and endogenous compounds, have proven to be more stable and reliable for normalization than biological indicators. However, differing instrumentation and extraction methods can make it difficult to compare results. This review examines current extraction and quantification methods for ten common population indicators: creatinine, coprostanol, nicotine, cotinine, sucralose, acesulfame, androstenedione 5-hydroindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), caffeine, and 1,7-dimethyluric acid. Some wastewater parameters such as ammonia, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and daily flowrate were also evaluated. The analytical methods included direct injection, dilute and shoot, liquid/liquid, and solid phase extraction (SPE). Creatine, acesulfame, nicotine, 5-HIAA and androstenedione have been analysed by direct injection into LC-MS; however, most authors prefer to include SPE steps to avoid matrix effects. Both LC-MS and GC-MS have been successfully used to quantify coprostanol in wastewater, and the other selected indicators have been quantified successfully with LC-MS. Acidification to stabilize the sample before freezing to maintain the integrity of samples has been reported to be beneficial. However, there are arguments both for and against working at acidic pHs. Wastewater parameters mentioned earlier are quick and easy to quantify, but the data does not always represent the human population effectively. A preference for population indicators originating solely from humans is apparent. This review summarises methods employed for chemical indicators in wastewater, provides a basis for choosing an appropriate extraction and analysis method, and highlights the utility of accurate chemical tracer data for wastewater-based epidemiology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37201600
pii: S0045-6535(23)00949-9
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138682
pmc: PMC10186006
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Wastewater
0
acetosulfame
MA3UYZ6K1H
Nicotine
6M3C89ZY6R
RNA, Viral
0
Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid
54-16-0
Androstenedione
409J2J96VR
Cholestanol
8M308U816E
Water Pollutants, Chemical
0
Indicators and Reagents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
138682Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.