The importance of timing in postcardiotomy venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A descriptive multicenter observational study.
acute heart failure
cardiac surgery
extracorporeal life support
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
mechanical circulatory support
postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock
Journal
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
ISSN: 1097-685X
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2023
12 2023
Historique:
received:
05
02
2023
revised:
05
04
2023
accepted:
22
04
2023
medline:
14
11
2023
pubmed:
19
5
2023
entrez:
18
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be initiated intraoperatively or postoperatively based on indications, settings, patient profile, and conditions. The topic of implantation timing only recently gained attention from the clinical community. We compare patient characteristics as well as in-hospital and long-term survival between intraoperative and postoperative ECMO. The retrospective, multicenter, observational Postcardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Support (PELS-1) study includes adults who required ECMO due to postcardiotomy shock between 2000 and 2020. We compared patients who received ECMO in the operating theater (intraoperative) with those in the intensive care unit (postoperative) on in-hospital and postdischarge outcomes. We studied 2003 patients (women: 41.1%; median age: 65 years; interquartile range [IQR], 55.0-72.0). Intraoperative ECMO patients (n = 1287) compared with postoperative ECMO patients (n = 716) had worse preoperative risk profiles. Cardiogenic shock (45.3%), right ventricular failure (15.9%), and cardiac arrest (14.3%) were the main indications for postoperative ECMO initiation, with cannulation occurring after (median) 1 day (IQR, 1-3 days). Compared with intraoperative application, patients who received postoperative ECMO showed more complications, cardiac reoperations (intraoperative: 19.7%; postoperative: 24.8%, P = .011), percutaneous coronary interventions (intraoperative: 1.8%; postoperative: 3.6%, P = .026), and had greater in-hospital mortality (intraoperative: 57.5%; postoperative: 64.5%, P = .002). Among hospital survivors, ECMO duration was shorter after intraoperative ECMO (median, 104; IQR, 67.8-164.2 hours) compared with postoperative ECMO (median, 139.7; IQR, 95.8-192 hours, P < .001), whereas postdischarge long-term survival was similar between the 2 groups (P = .86). Intraoperative and postoperative ECMO implantations are associated with different patient characteristics and outcomes, with greater complications and in-hospital mortality after postoperative ECMO. Strategies to identify the optimal location and timing of postcardiotomy ECMO in relation to specific patient characteristics are warranted to optimize in-hospital outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37201778
pii: S0022-5223(23)00366-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.04.042
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1670-1682.e33Investigateurs
Justine Ravaux
(J)
Ann-Kristin Schaefer
(AK)
Luca Conci
(L)
Philipp Szalkiewicz
(P)
Jawad Khalil
(J)
Sven Lehmann
(S)
Jean-Francois Obadia
(JF)
Nikolaos Kalampokas
(N)
Erwan Flecher
(E)
Dinis Dos Reis Miranda
(DDR)
Kogulan Sriranjan
(K)
Michael A Mazzeffi
(MA)
Nazli Vedadi
(N)
Marco Di Eusanio
(M)
Graeme MacLaren
(G)
Vitaly Sorokin
(V)
Alessandro Costetti
(A)
Chistof Schmid
(C)
Roberto Castillo
(R)
Vladimir Mikulenka
(V)
Marco Solinas
(M)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.