Diagnostic yield of urine lipoarabinomannan and sputum tuberculosis tests in people living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.


Journal

The Lancet. Global health
ISSN: 2214-109X
Titre abrégé: Lancet Glob Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101613665

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2023
Historique:
received: 27 01 2023
revised: 19 02 2023
accepted: 27 02 2023
medline: 22 5 2023
pubmed: 19 5 2023
entrez: 18 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Sputum is the most widely used sample to diagnose active tuberculosis, but many people living with HIV are unable to produce sputum. Urine, in contrast, is readily available. We hypothesised that sample availability influences the diagnostic yield of various tuberculosis tests. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data, we compared the diagnostic yield of point-of-care urine-based lipoarabinomannan tests with that of sputum-based nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and sputum smear microscopy (SSM). We used microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis based on positive culture or NAAT from any body site as the denominator and accounted for sample provision. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, African Journals Online, and clinicaltrials.gov from database inception to Feb 24, 2022 for randomised controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, and cohort studies that assessed urine lipoarabinomannan point-of-care tests and sputum NAATs for active tuberculosis detection in participants irrespective of tuberculosis symptoms, HIV status, CD4 cell count, or study setting. We excluded studies in which recruitment was not consecutive, systematic, or random; provision of sputum or urine was an inclusion criterion; less than 30 participants were diagnosed with tuberculosis; early research assays without clearly defined cutoffs were tested; and humans were not studied. We extracted study-level data, and authors of eligible studies were invited to contribute deidentified individual participant data. The main outcomes were the tuberculosis diagnostic yields of urine lipoarabinomannan tests, sputum NAATs, and SSM. Diagnostic yields were predicted using Bayesian random-effects and mixed-effects meta-analyses. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021230337. We identified 844 records, from which 20 datasets and 10 202 participants (4561 [45%] male participants and 5641 [55%] female participants) were included in the meta-analysis. All studies assessed sputum Xpert (MTB/RIF or Ultra, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and urine Alere Determine TB LAM (AlereLAM, Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) in people living with HIV aged 15 years or older. Nearly all (9957 [98%] of 10 202) participants provided urine, and 82% (8360 of 10 202) provided sputum within 2 days. In studies that enrolled unselected inpatients irrespective of tuberculosis symptoms, only 54% (1084 of 1993) of participants provided sputum, whereas 99% (1966 of 1993) provided urine. Diagnostic yield was 41% (95% credible interval [CrI] 15-66) for AlereLAM, 61% (95% Crl 25-88) for Xpert, and 32% (95% Crl 10-55) for SSM. Heterogeneity existed across studies in the diagnostic yield, influenced by CD4 cell count, tuberculosis symptoms, and clinical setting. In predefined subgroup analyses, all tests had higher yields in symptomatic participants, and AlereLAM yield was higher in those with low CD4 counts and inpatients. AlereLAM and Xpert yields were similar among inpatients in studies enrolling unselected participants who were not assessed for tuberculosis symptoms (51% vs 47%). AlereLAM and Xpert together had a yield of 71% in unselected inpatients, supporting the implementation of combined testing strategies. AlereLAM, with its rapid turnaround time and simplicity, should be prioritised to inform tuberculosis therapy among inpatients who are HIV-positive, regardless of symptoms or CD4 cell count. The yield of sputum-based tuberculosis tests is undermined by people living with HIV who cannot produce sputum, whereas nearly all participants are able to provide urine. The strengths of this meta-analysis are its large size, the carefully harmonised denominator, and the use of Bayesian random-effects and mixed-effects models to predict yields; however, data were geographically restricted, clinically diagnosed tuberculosis was not considered in the denominator, and little information exists on strategies for obtaining sputum samples. FIND, the Global Alliance for Diagnostics.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Sputum is the most widely used sample to diagnose active tuberculosis, but many people living with HIV are unable to produce sputum. Urine, in contrast, is readily available. We hypothesised that sample availability influences the diagnostic yield of various tuberculosis tests.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data, we compared the diagnostic yield of point-of-care urine-based lipoarabinomannan tests with that of sputum-based nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and sputum smear microscopy (SSM). We used microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis based on positive culture or NAAT from any body site as the denominator and accounted for sample provision. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, African Journals Online, and clinicaltrials.gov from database inception to Feb 24, 2022 for randomised controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, and cohort studies that assessed urine lipoarabinomannan point-of-care tests and sputum NAATs for active tuberculosis detection in participants irrespective of tuberculosis symptoms, HIV status, CD4 cell count, or study setting. We excluded studies in which recruitment was not consecutive, systematic, or random; provision of sputum or urine was an inclusion criterion; less than 30 participants were diagnosed with tuberculosis; early research assays without clearly defined cutoffs were tested; and humans were not studied. We extracted study-level data, and authors of eligible studies were invited to contribute deidentified individual participant data. The main outcomes were the tuberculosis diagnostic yields of urine lipoarabinomannan tests, sputum NAATs, and SSM. Diagnostic yields were predicted using Bayesian random-effects and mixed-effects meta-analyses. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021230337.
FINDINGS
We identified 844 records, from which 20 datasets and 10 202 participants (4561 [45%] male participants and 5641 [55%] female participants) were included in the meta-analysis. All studies assessed sputum Xpert (MTB/RIF or Ultra, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and urine Alere Determine TB LAM (AlereLAM, Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) in people living with HIV aged 15 years or older. Nearly all (9957 [98%] of 10 202) participants provided urine, and 82% (8360 of 10 202) provided sputum within 2 days. In studies that enrolled unselected inpatients irrespective of tuberculosis symptoms, only 54% (1084 of 1993) of participants provided sputum, whereas 99% (1966 of 1993) provided urine. Diagnostic yield was 41% (95% credible interval [CrI] 15-66) for AlereLAM, 61% (95% Crl 25-88) for Xpert, and 32% (95% Crl 10-55) for SSM. Heterogeneity existed across studies in the diagnostic yield, influenced by CD4 cell count, tuberculosis symptoms, and clinical setting. In predefined subgroup analyses, all tests had higher yields in symptomatic participants, and AlereLAM yield was higher in those with low CD4 counts and inpatients. AlereLAM and Xpert yields were similar among inpatients in studies enrolling unselected participants who were not assessed for tuberculosis symptoms (51% vs 47%). AlereLAM and Xpert together had a yield of 71% in unselected inpatients, supporting the implementation of combined testing strategies.
INTERPRETATION
AlereLAM, with its rapid turnaround time and simplicity, should be prioritised to inform tuberculosis therapy among inpatients who are HIV-positive, regardless of symptoms or CD4 cell count. The yield of sputum-based tuberculosis tests is undermined by people living with HIV who cannot produce sputum, whereas nearly all participants are able to provide urine. The strengths of this meta-analysis are its large size, the carefully harmonised denominator, and the use of Bayesian random-effects and mixed-effects models to predict yields; however, data were geographically restricted, clinically diagnosed tuberculosis was not considered in the denominator, and little information exists on strategies for obtaining sputum samples.
FUNDING
FIND, the Global Alliance for Diagnostics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37202025
pii: S2214-109X(23)00135-3
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00135-3
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

lipoarabinomannan 0
Lipopolysaccharides 0

Types de publication

Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e903-e916

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M007375/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 203135/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 214321/Z/18/Z
Pays : United Kingdom

Investigateurs

Suzette Oelofse (S)
Didier Laureillard (D)
Mauro Andreotti (M)
Obvious Nchimunya Chilyabanyama (ON)
Benjamin Welu (B)
Lucas Molfino (L)
Sekai Chenai Mathabire Rücker (SC)
Elisabeth Szumilin (E)
Loide Cossa (L)
Johanna Meléndez (J)
Linda Mbuthini (L)
Max O'Donnell (M)
Joseph N Jarvis (JN)
Gcobisa Ndlangalavu (G)
Katherine Fielding (K)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests TB reports patent applications in the field of tuberculosis detection, reports consulting fees from the FINDdx, and is a shareholder of Avelo. GMe was supported by the Wellcome Trust (214321/Z/18/Z and 203135/Z/16/Z) and the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation of South Africa (grant number 64787). The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this manuscript reflect those of the authors alone. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Auteurs

Tobias Broger (T)

Division of Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Lisa Koeppel (L)

Division of Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Helena Huerga (H)

Field Epidemiology Department, Epicentre, Paris, France.

Poppy Miller (P)

New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research, Auckland, New Zealand.

Ankur Gupta-Wright (A)

Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK; Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

François-Xavier Blanc (FX)

Service de Pneumologie, l'institut du thorax, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.

Aliasgar Esmail (A)

Centre for Lung Infection and Immunity, Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine and UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; South African MRC Centre for the Study of Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Byron W P Reeve (BWP)

DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa; South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa; Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

Marco Floridia (M)

National Center for Global Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.

Andrew D Kerkhoff (AD)

Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA; Trauma Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Fausto Ciccacci (F)

UniCamillus, International University of Health and Medical Science, Rome, Italy; Community of Sant'Egidio, DREAM programme, Rome, Italy.

Margaret P Kasaro (MP)

Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia; UNC Global Projects, LLC Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Swe Swe Thit (SS)

Department of Medicine, University of Medicine 2, Yangon, Myanmar.

Mathieu Bastard (M)

Field Epidemiology Department, Epicentre, Paris, France.

Gabriella Ferlazzo (G)

Department of Medicine, Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France.

Christina Yoon (C)

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA; Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Daniël J Van Hoving (DJ)

Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Division of Emergency Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

Bianca Sossen (B)

Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Juan Ignacio García (JI)

Population Health Program, Tuberculosis Group, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Matthew J Cummings (MJ)

Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Center for Infection and Immunity, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Rachel M Wake (RM)

Centre for Healthcare-Associated Infections, Antimicrobial Resistance and Mycoses, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa; Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, UK.

Josh Hanson (J)

The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Adithya Cattamanchi (A)

Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.

Graeme Meintjes (G)

Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Wellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Gary Maartens (G)

Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Wellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Robin Wood (R)

Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Grant Theron (G)

DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa; South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa; Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

Keertan Dheda (K)

Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Department of Immunology and Infection, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Centre for Lung Infection and Immunity, Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine and UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; South African MRC Centre for the Study of Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Ioana Diana Olaru (ID)

Division of Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Claudia M Denkinger (CM)

Division of Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; German Center for Infection Research, partner site, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: claudia.denkinger@uni-heidelberg.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH