Hierarchical processing underpins competition in tactile perceptual bistability.
Bifurcation analysis
Competition model
Levelt’s propositions
Perceptual bistability
Periodic forcing
Vibrotactile stimuli
Journal
Journal of computational neuroscience
ISSN: 1573-6873
Titre abrégé: J Comput Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9439510
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
received:
07
11
2022
accepted:
28
04
2023
revised:
25
04
2023
medline:
8
8
2023
pubmed:
19
5
2023
entrez:
19
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ambiguous sensory information can lead to spontaneous alternations between perceptual states, recently shown to extend to tactile perception. The authors recently proposed a simplified form of tactile rivalry which evokes two competing percepts for a fixed difference in input amplitudes across antiphase, pulsatile stimulation of the left and right fingers. This study addresses the need for a tactile rivalry model that captures the dynamics of perceptual alternations and that incorporates the structure of the somatosensory system. The model features hierarchical processing with two stages. The first and the second stages of model could be located at the secondary somatosensory cortex (area S2), or in higher areas driven by S2. The model captures dynamical features specific to the tactile rivalry percepts and produces general characteristics of perceptual rivalry: input strength dependence of dominance times (Levelt's proposition II), short-tailed skewness of dominance time distributions and the ratio of distribution moments. The presented modelling work leads to experimentally testable predictions. The same hierarchical model could generalise to account for percept formation, competition and alternations for bistable stimuli that involve pulsatile inputs from the visual and auditory domains.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37204542
doi: 10.1007/s10827-023-00852-0
pii: 10.1007/s10827-023-00852-0
pmc: PMC10404575
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
343-360Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5(11):1217-25
pubmed: 12368806
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Sep;98(3):1125-39
pubmed: 17615138
J Math Neurosci. 2021 May 3;11(1):8
pubmed: 33939042
Vision Res. 2015 Apr;109(Pt A):20-37
pubmed: 25749677
Nature. 2015 Oct 29;526(7575):705-9
pubmed: 26503050
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 10;18(2):e0268577
pubmed: 36763595
J Vis. 2016 Dec 1;16(15):6
pubmed: 27936270
Neurosci Conscious. 2023 Feb 04;2023(1):niac019
pubmed: 36751309
J Neurophysiol. 1980 Feb;43(2):444-68
pubmed: 6770054
J Math Neurosci. 2020 Jun 15;10(1):10
pubmed: 32542516
J Neurosci. 2000 Jan 1;20(1):495-510
pubmed: 10627625
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2009 Dec;26(12):2612-22
pubmed: 19956332
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 15;10(12):e0144788
pubmed: 26671774
Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Jul;3(7):254-264
pubmed: 10377540
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Jan;87(1):330-8
pubmed: 2299043
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 May;104(3):189-98
pubmed: 9186233
Nat Commun. 2019 Jun 6;10(1):2478
pubmed: 31171779
Vision Res. 2003 Mar;43(5):531-48
pubmed: 12594999
Neuroimage. 2001 Sep;14(3):759-67
pubmed: 11506548
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Aug;83(6):2613-2624
pubmed: 33890241
J Vis. 2005 Apr 04;5(4):287-98
pubmed: 15929652
Phys Rev Lett. 2014 Aug 29;113(9):098103
pubmed: 25216009
J Neurosci. 1990 Mar;10(3):952-74
pubmed: 2108231
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Apr;116(4):842-8
pubmed: 15792893
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Apr 10;16(4):e1007746
pubmed: 32275706
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Oct;80(4):2215-21
pubmed: 9772274
Sci Rep. 2018 May 8;8(1):7106
pubmed: 29740086
J Neurosci. 2019 Aug 14;39(33):6482-6497
pubmed: 31189576
Curr Biol. 2022 Oct 10;32(19):4139-4149.e4
pubmed: 35981538
Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;23(8):940-8
pubmed: 22810167
Neuron. 2010 Apr 29;66(2):300-14
pubmed: 20435005
Perception. 1985;14(2):135-43
pubmed: 4069943
Compr Physiol. 2018 Sep 14;8(4):1575-1602
pubmed: 30215864
J Comput Neurosci. 2002 Jan-Feb;12(1):39-53
pubmed: 11932559
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 25;100(24):14499-503
pubmed: 14612564
Curr Biol. 2008 Jul 22;18(14):1050-4
pubmed: 18635355
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Jun;19(6):295-7
pubmed: 25960421
J Neurosci. 2006 Jun 14;26(24):6485-95
pubmed: 16775136
Curr Biol. 2006 Jul 11;16(13):1351-7
pubmed: 16824924
Neuroimage. 1999 Jul;10(1):55-62
pubmed: 10385581
PLoS Biol. 2008 Jun 10;6(6):e138
pubmed: 18547141
Elife. 2021 Aug 09;10:
pubmed: 34369875
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jan;97(1):462-73
pubmed: 17065254
J Neurosci. 2020 Jun 17;40(25):4925-4935
pubmed: 32409620
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 May 03;12(5):e1004903
pubmed: 27138214
Perception. 2020 Jan;49(1):61-80
pubmed: 31707914
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;13(7):310-8
pubmed: 19540794
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Nov;18(11):1672-8
pubmed: 26436901
Neuroimage. 2020 Jan 1;204:116220
pubmed: 31546046
Biol Cybern. 2004 Apr;90(4):256-63
pubmed: 15085344
Neural Comput. 2000 Mar;12(3):597-645
pubmed: 10769324
J Neurosci. 2016 Jun 29;36(26):6957-72
pubmed: 27358454
J Vis. 2010 Sep 01;10(11):1
pubmed: 20884496
Psychol Rev. 1989 Jan;96(1):145-67
pubmed: 2648445
J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 9;31(10):3589-601
pubmed: 21389215
J Comput Neurosci. 2009 Aug;27(1):37-54
pubmed: 19125318
J Comp Neurol. 1986 Oct 15;252(3):348-73
pubmed: 3793981
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):E6192-E6201
pubmed: 28696323
PLoS One. 2016 May 12;11(5):e0152736
pubmed: 27171276
Cereb Cortex. 2001 May;11(5):463-73
pubmed: 11313298
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 21;12:720131
pubmed: 34621219
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Nov 12;11(11):e1004555
pubmed: 26562507
J Neurosci. 2006 May 31;26(22):5970-7
pubmed: 16738239
Curr Biol. 2009 Sep 29;19(18):1561-5
pubmed: 19699095