Offloading under cognitive load: Humans are willing to offload parts of an attentionally demanding task to an algorithm.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
07
01
2023
accepted:
08
05
2023
medline:
22
5
2023
pubmed:
19
5
2023
entrez:
19
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In the near future, humans will increasingly be required to offload tasks to artificial systems to facilitate daily as well as professional activities. Yet, research has shown that humans are often averse to offloading tasks to algorithms (so-called "algorithmic aversion"). In the present study, we asked whether this aversion is also present when humans act under high cognitive load. Participants performed an attentionally demanding task (a multiple object tracking (MOT) task), which required them to track a subset of moving targets among distractors on a computer screen. Participants first performed the MOT task alone (Solo condition) and were then given the option to offload an unlimited number of targets to a computer partner (Joint condition). We found that participants significantly offloaded some (but not all) targets to the computer partner, thereby improving their individual tracking accuracy (Experiment 1). A similar tendency for offloading was observed when participants were informed beforehand that the computer partner's tracking accuracy was flawless (Experiment 2). The present findings show that humans are willing to (partially) offload task demands to an algorithm to reduce their own cognitive load. We suggest that the cognitive load of a task is an important factor to consider when evaluating human tendencies for offloading cognition onto artificial systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37205658
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286102
pii: PONE-D-23-00394
pmc: PMC10198496
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0286102Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Wahn et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Références
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jun;9(6):296-305
pubmed: 15925809
Hum Factors. 2022 May;64(3):499-513
pubmed: 32955351
Cogn Psychol. 2001 Nov;43(3):171-216
pubmed: 11689021
Cognition. 2018 Dec;181:21-34
pubmed: 30107256
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Sep;20(9):676-688
pubmed: 27542527
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 15;11(12):e0168087
pubmed: 27977762
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Apr;215:103291
pubmed: 33770664
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Feb;144(1):114-26
pubmed: 25401381
J Vis. 2014 Apr 01;14(4):
pubmed: 24692319
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Jan;212:103205
pubmed: 33202313
Spat Vis. 1988;3(3):179-97
pubmed: 3153671
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017 Mar 31;13(1):83-96
pubmed: 28450975
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Sep;47(9):1166-1181
pubmed: 34694847
Cogn Sci. 2019 Dec;43(12):e12802
pubmed: 31858630
J Vis. 2007 Oct 30;7(13):14.1-10
pubmed: 17997642
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 27;8:1896
pubmed: 29163278
Hum Factors. 2019 Mar;61(2):243-254
pubmed: 30169972